I would like to know the reasons why monks disrobe. Have you disrobed and if so why? No judgments here- just trying to understand. Thanks.
with metta
Matheesha
Disrobing
-
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:29 pm
- Location: London, UK
Disrobing
With Metta
Karuna
Mudita
& Upekkha
Karuna
Mudita
& Upekkha
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27848
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Disorbing
Greetings,
And should it pertain to anyone's situation, I would be interested to hear of anyone's subsequent reasons for re-robing!
Metta,
Retro.
And should it pertain to anyone's situation, I would be interested to hear of anyone's subsequent reasons for re-robing!
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Disorbing
Anyone seen the movie Samsara?
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: Disorbing
Ven. Dhammika, in one of his articles estimates that (of those who disrobe) 70% disrobe over issues with lust and cravings. The other 30% disrobe due to boredom.
The successful ones who are able to stick with it, have gone beyond or mostly beyond the issues over cravings and keep themselves occupied with meditation, writing, gardening, and teaching.
The successful ones who are able to stick with it, have gone beyond or mostly beyond the issues over cravings and keep themselves occupied with meditation, writing, gardening, and teaching.
Re: Disorbing
I would add a little bit:
Buddha said in SN that monks, who don't restrain themselves in the area of 6 senses, don't practise moderate eating, don't practise meditation - have a possibility to disrobe. But those who do all that - they have no such possibility.
Re: Disorbing
That makes sense, being able to devote most of your time to those things are what being a monk has to offer, uniquely. If a person isn't applying themselves to those things then they are depriving themselves pointlessly.Zom wrote:
I would add a little bit:
Buddha said in SN that monks, who don't restrain themselves in the area of 6 senses, don't practice moderate eating, don't practice meditation - have a possibility to disrobe. But those who do all that - they have no such possibility.
In reading the scriptures, there are two kinds of mistakes:
One mistake is to cling to the literal text and miss the inner principles.
The second mistake is to recognize the principles but not apply them to your own mind, so that you waste time and just make them into causes of entanglement.
One mistake is to cling to the literal text and miss the inner principles.
The second mistake is to recognize the principles but not apply them to your own mind, so that you waste time and just make them into causes of entanglement.
- Goofaholix
- Posts: 4018
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:49 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Disorbing
I disorbed, and am no longer an orb.rowyourboat wrote:I would like to know the reasons why monks disrobe. Have you disrobed and if so why? No judgments here- just trying to understand. Thanks.
with metta
Matheesha
Seriously though my ordination was planned to be only for 3 months and prior to getting married as is common in Thailand.
In SE Asia (sri lanka possibly an exception being a monk is not considered a lifetime vocation for most, an extended retreat instead perhaps, i don't think this is a good thing).
If my wife to be had changed her mind I'd have quite happily stayed on though.
Pronouns (no self / not self)
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.”
― Ajahn Chah
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.”
― Ajahn Chah
Re: Disorbing
this teaching should not be available to lay people
- Bhikkhu Pesala
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm
Re: Disorbing
There is no esoteric teaching in Buddhism — at least not in the Theravāða. The Vinaya is open for lay people to study if they wish to.Gena1480 wrote:this teaching should not be available to lay people
Should Lay Persons Learn the Vinaya?
This section explains the meaning of the Mangala Dhamma “well-trained in discipline” in relation to a lay person’s Vinaya. Lay people have a natural discipline called “Good conduct” (sucarita vinaya), and “Virtuous conduct” (ācāra vinaya), which they should try to maintain in full with faith and diligence. This ethical conduct was prescribed for the laity by the Buddha, so they do not need to learn the Vinaya for monks.
However, wise lay persons who want to promote the Buddha’s teachings, and are well versed in their own discipline, do need to learn the monks’ Vinaya. Why? Those who are well-trained in the householder’s discipline become truly good people, so their minds and motives are good. If they are well controlled by the lay person’s discipline, after learning the monks’ Vinaya, they will not use their knowledge unwisely. They will not defile themselves with impure physical, vocal, and mental actions. They will not accumulate evil motives and evil kammas because of this new knowledge. In the commentary it is mentioned that a wise, learned brahmin, after listening to the monks’ Vinaya rules in detail, developed a clear mind and strong faith in the Sangha. He appreciated the power and significance of the monks’ Vinaya as clear understanding had revealed its profundity.
One day a devoted brahmin heard the monks reciting their Vinaya rules. Appreciating the benefits of these numerous rules he entered the Sangha. Thus one’s own attitude and motive are crucial to evaluate the knowledge of Vinaya rules and the diverse conduct of monks.
The way for a lay person to study the Vinaya is first to learn and practise the lay person’s Vinaya, which gives culture, wisdom, and knowledge. A lay person must be dedicated to observing lay ethics with perfect integrity. If integrity is lacking, a lay person, though learned in ethics, becomes a hypocrite with sham morality. He or she becomes a bad person. This type of lay person, who learns the monks’ Vinaya, will develop a fault-finding attitude. Seeing only the offences and weaknesses of monks, he or she will blame, slander, and abuse them. So there is no benefit for such a lay person in learning the monks’ Vinaya. Since he or she fails to learn and practise the lay person’s Vinaya well, he or she lacks fundamental virtues and a skilful mental attitude. So it is futile to learn the monks’ Vinaya, since he or she will criticise the conduct of wayward monks, interfering in the affairs of others. Such a person who quotes the Vinaya texts and blames the monks, makes evil kamma because he or she lacks the virtues of a good and moral person. Due to these defects he or she takes a superior stance, uttering words of condemnation and slander. Thus, grave evil kammas result from his or her learning.
Blog • Pāli Fonts • In This Very Life • Buddhist Chronicles • Software (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
- theravada_guy
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:06 am
Re: Disorbing
Thankfully it is open to the laity to study because I really enjoy studying the ways of the bhikkhus and bhikkhunis.Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:There is no esoteric teaching in Buddhism — at least not in the Theravāða. The Vinaya is open for lay people to study if they wish to.Gena1480 wrote:this teaching should not be available to lay people
And, I agree with Goofaholix. I don't like the idea of Going Forth with the intention that it is only temporary, either. I can understand someone who takes ordination, but then realizes it's not for him/her, but not the whole temporary ordination thing.
With mettā,
TG
TG
Re: Disorbing
Temporary ordination is more productive than going to college to join a fraternity.
Sotthī hontu nirantaraṃ - May you forever be well.
Re: Disorbing
it is matter of right speech
the teaching are available
go ahead and study then
it should be no concern to laity for reason of disrobing
since they did not put the robes on.
the teaching are available
go ahead and study then
it should be no concern to laity for reason of disrobing
since they did not put the robes on.
- theravada_guy
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:06 am
Re: Disorbing
I also agree with this, Buckwheat. Maybe it's not so much of a bad thing after all. I never really thought about it in terms like that. I know in the suttas there is the case of the bhikkhu who kept disrobing and re-robing, and finally the Buddha put a limit on as to how much a person could ordain in one lifetime. I forget which sutta though.Buckwheat wrote:Temporary ordination is more productive than going to college to join a fraternity.
With mettā,
TG
TG
- Bhikkhu Pesala
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm
Re: Disorbing
As with all things, it depends very much on the intention.theravada_guy wrote:And, I agree with Goofaholix. I don't like the idea of Going Forth with the intention that it is only temporary, either. I can understand someone who takes ordination, but then realizes it's not for him/her, but not the whole temporary ordination thing.
- Right at the bottom of the scale there are those who ordain just to collect money
- Then there are those who ordain to gain respect in society or make merit
- And there are those who ordain to practice meditation seriously while they still have the opportunity, knowing that after marriage it won't be feasible. There are even those who are married who take temporary ordination to practice meditation for a few weeks only. Even so, they may gain significant insights or better if they are wise and practice seriously.
Ultimately, we monks are all ordained only temporarily — just for a bit longer than most. We can disrobe at any time if the mind changes, or we may have to if we fall into an offence of defeat. Though that is not our wish or intention, such things can happen depending on circumstances.
The real difference between individuals, whether lay persons, “temporary” monks, or “permanent” monks, lies in their determination to attain the Path in this very life, and whether or not they have genuine spiritual urgency (samvega) about the dangers of samsāra.
AFAIK there is no limit to the number of times a bhikkhu may disrobe and be re-ordained. The monk in question ordained seven times and disrobed six times. Finally, he attained Arahantship.
Blog • Pāli Fonts • In This Very Life • Buddhist Chronicles • Software (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
- theravada_guy
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:06 am
Re: Disorbing
Thank you, Bhante, for that post. It changed my mind on temporary ordination. I can see your point that all monks are technically only temporarily ordained. Even if they never disrobe, death can come at any moment.
That monk that disrobed so many times and attained Arahantship, I guess I read somewhere where that set the limit that you could only take on the robes a total of seven times, but I could be wrong. Maybe the Buddha never explicitly mentioned that. I'm not sure.
That monk that disrobed so many times and attained Arahantship, I guess I read somewhere where that set the limit that you could only take on the robes a total of seven times, but I could be wrong. Maybe the Buddha never explicitly mentioned that. I'm not sure.
With mettā,
TG
TG