Textual analysis and comparative discussion on early Buddhist sects and texts.
by Kusala » Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:39 pm
Hello Dhamma friends. Some scholars suggest the Buddha's clan may have been Scythian. Is there any truth to it?
-

Kusala
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am
-
by Kim O'Hara » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:44 pm
Hi, Kusala,
Three answers - accept any or all of them as you like

because I think they are all correct.
(1) It doesn't matter. What matters is what he taught.
(2) Probably not, going by
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians - but 'Scythian' is so poorly defined anyway that the answer is not going to be very meaningful.
(3) If you said which scholars and where, we might be able to give you a more reasoned response to their claims.
Kim
-

Kim O'Hara
-
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
- Location: North Queensland, Australia
-
Return to Early Buddhism
Who is online
Registered users: Bakmoon, Bhikkhu Cintita, Billymac29, Bing [Bot], Birgit, BuddhaSoup, cooran, Coyote, dharmagoat, EmptyShadow, fivebells, Google [Bot], Kim O'Hara, kiwi, kmath, marc108, mettafuture, Modus.Ponens, piotr, polarbuddha101, reflection, Viscid