Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

The cultivation of calm or tranquility and the development of concentration
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings all,

In the suttas, does the Buddha speak of doing anapanasati in postures other than when sitting?

If so, sutta references would be appreciated.

:meditate:

Thanks.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
bodom
Posts: 7216
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:18 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by bodom »

Hey Retro

Interesting question. In my studies Ive never come across any sutta passages in reference to your question. The suttas alway give the same three suitable locations in regards to practicing anapanasati:
"There is the case where a monk, having gone to the wilderness, to the shade of a tree, or to an empty building, sits down folding his legs crosswise, holding his body erect, and setting mindfulness to the fore.
Personally I have found it quite useful to turn to the breath no matter where I may be or what im doing whether im working, sitting in the car or standing in line somewhere. Its a good way to stay mindful and focused while going about daily life. Theres several modern day teachers who also point out the usefulness of turning to the breath occasionally during daily activities to stay focused off the cushion

:anjali:
Liberation is the inevitable fruit of the path and is bound to blossom forth when there is steady and persistent practice. The only requirements for reaching the final goal are two: to start and to continue. If these requirements are met there is no doubt the goal will be attained. This is the Dhamma, the undeviating law.

- BB
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by Cittasanto »

retrofuturist wrote:Greetings all,

In the suttas, does the Buddha speak of doing anapanasati in postures other than when sitting?

If so, sutta references would be appreciated.

:meditate:

Thanks.

Metta,
Retro. :)
I do not believe it is specific instructions and do not have a referene to hand but...
I think there is a sutta or two which gives the stock passage of the satipatthana sutta of the postures then the anapana intructuon? maybe if you check the notes in my translaion in the postures section I may of referenced it?

I will have a look later on maybe tomorrow at the earliest.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
sattva
Posts: 1254
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 10:07 pm

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by sattva »

Warning:
Dumb question coming!

When Buddha laid down on his side to die was he doing any special practice at the time? If the anapanasati can only be done sitting, then few people who are weak and dying will be able to do it.
http://www.chatzy.com/25904628501622
User avatar
acinteyyo
Posts: 1706
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:48 am
Location: Bavaria / Germany

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by acinteyyo »

What about this passage?
"And how is mindfulness of in-&-out breathing developed & pursued so as to bring the four frames of reference to their culmination?
On whatever occasion a monk breathing...
On whatever occasion a monk trains himself, 'I will breathe...
Seems that posture isn't quite important as to bring the four frames of reference to their culmination, doesn't it?

best wishes, acinteyyo
Thag 1.20. Ajita - I do not fear death; nor do I long for life. I’ll lay down this body, aware and mindful.
User avatar
mirco
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:12 pm

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by mirco »

sattva wrote:When Buddha laid down on his side to die was he doing any special practice at the time? If the anapanasati can only be done sitting, then few people who are weak and dying will be able to do it.
Maybe a bit off-topic, but there is/was need to use breath as object of meditation only.
Brahmavihara was/were the recommended object(s) for any posture.
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by daverupa »

acinteyyo wrote:What about this passage?
It's building on the previous portion of the Sutta - "on whatever occasion" follows after having gone to the wilderness, tree, or hut, and having sat down:

"Now how is mindfulness of in-&-out breathing developed & pursued so as to be of great fruit, of great benefit? There is the case where a monk, having gone to the wilderness, to the shade of a tree, or to an empty building, sits down folding his legs crosswise, holding his body erect, and setting mindfulness to the fore... And how is mindfulness of in-&-out breathing developed & pursued so as to bring the four frames of reference to their culmination? On whatever occasion a monk [does anapanasati]... on that occasion the monk remains focused..."

Elsewhere and quite commonly, "walking up and down" is described. SN 35.120 is the only place I've seen them juxtaposed:

"And how, friend, is one given to watchfulness? In this a monk walks up and down by day and then sits, thus cleansing his mind from obstructive states. [Similarly for the first watch of the night.] In the middle watch of the night, lying on his right side, he adopts the lion posture, resting one foot on the other, mindful and clearly aware, with his thoughts fixed on rising. In the last watch of the night he rises, walks up and down, and then sits, thus cleansing his mind from obstructive states. That, friend, is how one is given to watchfulness."

IMO, walking up and down strikes me as a different sort of behavior than Anapanasati. I wonder if the Kayagatasati Sutta offered bhavana for the non-seated, the Satipatthana Sutta(s) attempted to sum them both, and the textual tradition ended up fumbling this three-ball juggle through diffusion...
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
User avatar
contemplans
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:10 pm

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by contemplans »

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .agku.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
ancientbuddhism
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:53 pm
Location: Cyberia

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by ancientbuddhism »

caṅkama is not connected with ānāpāna
I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes.” – Henry David Thoreau, Walden, 1854

Secure your own mask before assisting others. – NORTHWEST AIRLINES (Pre-Flight Instruction)

A Handful of Leaves
User avatar
contemplans
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:10 pm

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by contemplans »

ancientbuddhism wrote: caṅkama is not connected with ānāpāna
What I've usually heard is that they are related, but the complete tracking on the in and out is not possible because of the movement, so the focus is more of the presence of the breath in general without attending to the in and out.
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by daverupa »

contemplans wrote:
ancientbuddhism wrote: caṅkama is not connected with ānāpāna
What I've usually heard is that they are related, but the complete tracking on the in and out is not possible because of the movement, so the focus is more of the presence of the breath in general without attending to the in and out.
With no attending to the in and out, there is simply no anapanasati (what do you think "anapana-" means?).
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
User avatar
contemplans
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:10 pm

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by contemplans »

daverupa wrote:
contemplans wrote:
ancientbuddhism wrote: caṅkama is not connected with ānāpāna
What I've usually heard is that they are related, but the complete tracking on the in and out is not possible because of the movement, so the focus is more of the presence of the breath in general without attending to the in and out.
With no attending to the in and out, there is simply no anapanasati (what do you think "anapana-" means?).
I understand, but what is advised is the breath energy. You start with he in and out with sitting, and then move on from there. Walking won't be much like sitting in this respect, but we can still be with the breath. You can track the in-out a bit, but it's just different. The movement disturbs it, so it is better to just be with the breath as "energy". What else would be the focus?
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19943
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by mikenz66 »

Hi contemplans,

The original question was:
retrofuturist wrote: In the suttas, does the Buddha speak of doing anapanasati in postures other than when sitting?

If so, sutta references would be appreciated.
I don't see any problem with using the breath as an object in an position, and many modern (and probably ancient) teachers recommend maintaining it in all positions (if that's the object you are using...). However, the actual question was whether it was specifically spelled out in the suttas.

:anjali:
Mike
starter
Posts: 938
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:56 pm

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by starter »

Hi, I use mindfulness of breathing as a means for sense restraint in all postures to keep the mind centered inside (on the breath), since I haven't found another more effective way to practice sense restraint during daily work life. To my limited knowledge, the Buddha didn't seem to have taught a detailed method on how to restrain the mind from grasping at the gross sign and fine details/features of six sense objects, which might arouse unskillful qualities such as greed or aversion (please correct me if I'm wrong). He did teach us to focus on the drawbacks of sense objects, which is difficult to remember when busy with tasks at hand. I've found mindfulness of breathing can really calm me down, during conversations for instance.

Metta to all,

Starter
User avatar
ancientbuddhism
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:53 pm
Location: Cyberia

Re: Anapanasati in non-sitting postures?

Post by ancientbuddhism »

The suttas which deal with mindfulness contemplative work are rather specific with the context of contemplative objects. Ānāpānasati always has the specific context to seated meditation, with its aim being unification of the breath with the body where the primary object of the breath is the focal-point for peripheral, expansive awareness which facilitates mental and physical calm. Similarly, the object of the four iriyāpatha is implicit to those activities themselves, with there aim being unification through those objects.

When trying to hold more than one object at the same time i.e. mindfulness of the breath simultaneous with the movement of walking, the awareness will lose the sense of unity and become distracted and restless as awareness will naturally oscillate between the two. This is called holding too many things in the mind which only weakens the contemplative endeavor to release into calmer states where precise examination of states, knowledge and discernment can arise.

Because the suttas are slight on instruction where the four iriyāpatha are concerned, this may be why there are so many variant interpretations by later traditions. These are not necessarily wrong, so long as the goal of contemplative work is not disrupted. I just don’t see why there would be any other object with reference to the four iriyāpatha than mindfulness of that specific posture or action, as the suttas imply.
  • Sādhu sādhu ānanda, tena hi tvaṃ ānanda idampi chaṭṭhaṃ anussatiṭṭhānaṃ dhārehi: Idhānanda bhikkhu satova abhikkamati, satova paṭikkamati, satova tiṭṭhati, satova nisīdati, satova seyyaṃ kappeti, satova kammaṃ adhiṭṭhāti. Idaṃ ānanda anussatiṭṭhānaṃ evaṃbhāvitaṃ evaṃ bahulīkataṃ satisampajaññāya saṃvattatīti.'

    “Excellent! Excellent! Ānanda, you should bear these six contemplations also.

    “Ānanda, there is a monk that mindfully walks forward, mindfully walks back, mindfully stands, mindfully sits down, mindfully prepares for sleep, and mindfully determines actions. These contemplations, Ānanda, when developed and practiced, bring forth mindfulness and clear knowing.” - AN.6.29 Udāyī Sutta
I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes.” – Henry David Thoreau, Walden, 1854

Secure your own mask before assisting others. – NORTHWEST AIRLINES (Pre-Flight Instruction)

A Handful of Leaves
Post Reply