


bodom wrote:Dighajanu (Vyagghapajja) Sutta: Conditions of Welfare
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .nara.html
"Let the Blessed One, venerable sir, exhort us and instruct us in a way that may lead to our welfare and happiness for a long time."
"Therefore, Dhammadinna, you should train yourselves
thus:
'From time to time we will enter and dwell upon those discourses spoken by the Tathaagata that are deep, deep in meaninng, suparamundane, dealing with emptiness." It is in such a way that that you should train yourselves."
We, Lord, are laymen who enjoy worldly pleasure. We lead a life encumbered by wife and children...[and that it would be difficult for them to meditate on emptiness.]


Gotami Sutta: To Gotami
translated from the Pali by
Thanissaro Bhikkhu
© 1996–2012
I have heard that at one time the Blessed One was staying at Vesali, in the Peaked Roof Hall in the Great Forest.
Then Mahapajapati Gotami went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed down to him, stood to one side. As she was standing there she said to him: "It would be good, lord, if the Blessed One would teach me the Dhamma in brief such that, having heard the Dhamma from the Blessed One, I might dwell alone, secluded, heedful, ardent, & resolute."
"Gotami, the qualities of which you may know, 'These qualities lead to passion, not to dispassion; to being fettered, not to being unfettered; to accumulating, not to shedding; to self-aggrandizement, not to modesty; to discontent, not to contentment; to entanglement, not to seclusion; to laziness, not to aroused persistence; to being burdensome, not to being unburdensome': You may categorically hold, 'This is not the Dhamma, this is not the Vinaya, this is not the Teacher's instruction.'
"As for the qualities of which you may know, 'These qualities lead to dispassion, not to passion; to being unfettered, not to being fettered; to shedding, not to accumulating; to modesty, not to self-aggrandizement; to contentment, not to discontent; to seclusion, not to entanglement; to aroused persistence, not to laziness; to being unburdensome, not to being burdensome': You may categorically hold, 'This is the Dhamma, this is the Vinaya, this is the Teacher's instruction.'"
That is what the Blessed One said. Gratified, Mahapajapati Gotami delighted at his words.
bodom wrote:Definitely these:
Sigalovada Sutta: The Discourse to Sigala
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .nara.html
This sutta describes in depth the virtue to be developed by the householder.
"Now I will tell you the layman's duty. Following it a lay-disciple would be virtuous; for it is not possible for one occupied with the household life to realize the complete bhikkhu practice (dhamma).
purist_andrew wrote:I like the Dhammika Sutta.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/snp/snp.2.14.irel.html
Advice on the eight precepts with emphasis on the virtue of the five and not encouraging others to break the five, as well as on the Uposatha, dana to the monks, being dilligent, and attaining a fortunate rebirth among the "shining" devas.
I kinda thought that it was a little strange though, as far as this passage:"Now I will tell you the layman's duty. Following it a lay-disciple would be virtuous; for it is not possible for one occupied with the household life to realize the complete bhikkhu practice (dhamma).
Of course we know throughout the Canon and the history of the dispensation many laymen and laywomen have attained, but apart from that statement it seems to suggest a good practice for both this life and the next.
Thoughts?
Cittasanto wrote:purist_andrew wrote:I like the Dhammika Sutta.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/snp/snp.2.14.irel.html
Advice on the eight precepts with emphasis on the virtue of the five and not encouraging others to break the five, as well as on the Uposatha, dana to the monks, being dilligent, and attaining a fortunate rebirth among the "shining" devas.
I kinda thought that it was a little strange though, as far as this passage:"Now I will tell you the layman's duty. Following it a lay-disciple would be virtuous; for it is not possible for one occupied with the household life to realize the complete bhikkhu practice (dhamma).
Of course we know throughout the Canon and the history of the dispensation many laymen and laywomen have attained, but apart from that statement it seems to suggest a good practice for both this life and the next.
Thoughts?
Hi andrew,
it maybe better to start a new thread for any thoughts on this particular sutta as it would get more attention that way?
but the quoted part is to do with the livelihood and precepts, not the attainments possible, a householder can not live by the rules of the mendicant communities due to the nature of the household life, how would a householder get by without money, or ability to shop for food, or the food requirements needed for certain work?
it is in essence saying if you are going to be a mendicant be a mendicant, if you are going to be a lay person be a lay person, sure there are some precepts which can be addopted by lay people but the entire set of rules can not be.
Therefore, Dhammadinna, you should train yourselves thus: ‘From time to time we will enter and dwell upon those discourses spoken by the Tathagata that are deep, deep in
meaning, supramundane, dealing with emptiness.’ It is in such a way that you should train yourselves.”


Ricardo da Silva wrote:My favorite Suttas for lay practice
Sigalovada Sutta: The Discourse to Sigala
Mingala Sutta
Karaniya Metta Sutta
Maha-Satipatthana Sutta
Dhajjaga Sutta
Kesaputtiya Sutta (Kalama Sutta): The Discourse to the Kalamas
http://www.thisismyanmar.com/nibbana/ti ... saputt.htm
![]()
purist_andrew wrote:Cittasanto wrote:Hi andrew,
it maybe better to start a new thread for any thoughts on this particular sutta as it would get more attention that way?
but the quoted part is to do with the livelihood and precepts, not the attainments possible, a householder can not live by the rules of the mendicant communities due to the nature of the household life, how would a householder get by without money, or ability to shop for food, or the food requirements needed for certain work?
it is in essence saying if you are going to be a mendicant be a mendicant, if you are going to be a lay person be a lay person, sure there are some precepts which can be addopted by lay people but the entire set of rules can not be.
Hi Citta,
I have to take a different interpretation of the statement in question than you. To me, "bhikkhu practice" means the threefold training culminating in liberation, not things like robes, eating donated food and so on. The reason I think this makes sense is because following that statement, the Buddha instructs the lay disciple in this sutta towards the end of being "virtuous" and in addition to the end of attaining a rebirth in the deva plane rather than, and falling short of, liberation. To me, this means he is saying "A layperson cannot complete the threefold training (because the household life impedes it), but, falling short of that, here is what he can do -- be virtuous and attain a heavenly rebirth."
I was pointing out that although we know the tradition says the household life is full of impediments to liberation, it's not impossible to attain it from within said. That's the discrepancy.
Nonetheless, I like the sutta; it's concise and shows how to be virtuous and attain a good (even "shining" or "radiant") rebirth, and I like the parts about dana to the sangha, supporting your parents, and not encouraging others to break the five precepts. Neat.
Return to Theravāda for the modern world
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Crazy cloud, Google [Bot], Kim O'Hara, lifefool, Majestic-12 [Bot], mettafuture, Peter_S, rahul3bds, reflection, Sekha