Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

A place to discuss health and fitness, healthy diets. A fit body makes for a fit mind.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by Ben »

I think some of you will find the following Guardian article of interest which is a crituqie of the modern "food revolution" and the rise of "foodie" culture. Working with food in an educational setting the inconsistencies and paradoxes of "ethical" and "sustainable" food production is something that i am increasingly aware of and uncomfortable with.
Then there's organic food. The tech spec of organic food – the fact that nothing synthetic is used in its production – suggests flavour, nutritional value and agricultural ethics. But it has become a devalued, mass-market symbolic indicator. Organics are promoted as both available to all and a luxury treat, but often they're more expensive and they taste the same. And they're not even necessarily good for the environment, either. Increasing demand has led to organic meat being raised on vast industrial feed lots, and the scarcity of organic ingredients means they are flown around the world. Research sponsored by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs showed that the production of a litre of organic milk requires 80% more land than conventional milk. And that organically reared cows burp and fart twice as much methane as conventionally reared cattle, which would be amusing if it weren't for the fact that methane is 20 times more powerful a greenhouse gas than CO2.

https://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/l ... ion-glaser" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
As always, your on-topic responses are most welcome.

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 5584
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by Kim OHara »

Hi, Ben,
There's certainly a lot of hijacking going on - clean/green/sustainable/organic being sold as luxury, as an element of the 'conspicuous consumption' lifestyle that contributes excessively to environmental destruction.
Parallel to that, there is all the gastro-porn: celebrity chefs, 'eating your way along the Silk Road', that sort of thing.
And they, in turn, feed the obesity epidemic.
:thinking:

I don't know where to start tackling the problem - maybe we have to start anywhere and everywhere, as we need to do in combatting global warming. For me, that means eating as fresh, as seasonally and as locally as I can, cutting back on meat (environmentally expensive as well as un-Buddhist), and making baby steps towards growing my own food in my spare time. It's all common sense but, as we know, common sense ain't all that common.

:namaste:
Kim
User avatar
rowboat
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:31 am
Location: Brentwood Bay

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by rowboat »

A Facebook account is required to read the article posted in the OP. Here is a direct link to the article for those without a Facebook account: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/ ... ion-glaser" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Rain soddens what is covered up,
It does not sodden what is open.
Therefore uncover what is covered
That the rain will not sodden it.
Ud 5.5
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27839
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
Kim O'Hara wrote:I don't know where to start tackling the problem
It is sukha for it not to be a problem.

It seems the problem lies with the diversity in human greed and guilt... and the fact these two factors aren't bundled up in equal measures in human beings.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by ground »

Sustainability begins when eating of animal products ceases and food revolution begins when seeking taste ceases.

Kind regards
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by tiltbillings »

TMingyur wrote: seeking taste ceases.
That will never happen.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19932
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by mikenz66 »

A former soil-science prof at our local agricultural university used to get extremely frustrated with the "organic" manifesto. New Zealand has all kinds of nutrient deficiencies due to the geology (volcanic plateau in the North Island, other issues in the South), and successful agriculture is only possible because of the research that figured out what was required to balance the nutrients. He was all for using organic methods as much as possible, but to take the position that "pure organic" is "better" than adding necessary nutrients is just posturing.

I went to an interesting talk a couple of years ago about research on using particular flowers to attract natural predators (to reduce pesticide use). This is an idea that has been around for a while, but apparently not much research has been done and most of the folklore about it is not very accurate, so he wasn't particularly enthusiastic about "organic" manifestos. His hope was for horticultural industries here, such as wine, to be able to be completely pesticide free, which would be quite impressive...

:anjali:
Mike
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by ground »

tiltbillings wrote:
TMingyur wrote: seeking taste ceases.
That will never happen.
I cannot help you.

Kind regards
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by tiltbillings »

TMingyur wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:
TMingyur wrote: seeking taste ceases.
That will never happen.
I cannot help you.

Kind regards
I did not ask for your help, but given the nature of taste and food, the ceasing of taste is not going to happen forthe population as a whole, which was my point.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by Ben »

Hi Kim,
Kim O'Hara wrote:Hi, Ben,
There's certainly a lot of hijacking going on - clean/green/sustainable/organic being sold as luxury, as an element of the 'conspicuous consumption' lifestyle that contributes excessively to environmental destruction.
Parallel to that, there is all the gastro-porn: celebrity chefs, 'eating your way along the Silk Road', that sort of thing.
And they, in turn, feed the obesity epidemic.
:thinking:
Yes, that is one of the points that the article makes quite nicely. I am at the proverbial "coalface" by providing and profiling different types of international, seasonal and healthy food within an educational setting. I am becoming more and more uncomfortable regarding some of the expectations from staff to provide certain brands of food because of the assumptions they have that its greener, more environmentally friendly, more ethical. A classic example is a long running request to not buy any products with palm sugar (growth in palm sugar plantations are cited as a threat to orang utang populations). The fact is, there still isn't legislation in Australia that requires food manufacturers to declare palm sugar and so most of it goes under the radar. On top of that, I am also required to buy huge volumes of chocolate (as a snack item) which even the fair trade variety uses enforced child labor to harvest the cocoa. And the fact that chocolate represents thousands of carbon kilometres. When I raised this with the staff, it was clear their attachment to chocolate was far greater than their desire to be ethical.
Kim O'Hara wrote:I don't know where to start tackling the problem - maybe we have to start anywhere and everywhere, as we need to do in combatting global warming. For me, that means eating as fresh, as seasonally and as locally as I can, cutting back on meat (environmentally expensive as well as un-Buddhist), and making baby steps towards growing my own food in my spare time. It's all common sense but, as we know, common sense ain't all that common.
Yes, it is difficult. I guess we need to wise-up to the deception that is going on in the marketplace and make purchasing decisions with that in mind. Reducing meat consumption is a good idea as it is so resource intensive. I do recommend that you have a go at growing your own. Its a bit of work but...so rewarding. I wish I had photos of the vegie and herb gardens at campus. I mostly planted them out and despite being largely reliant on rain during summer, it has been incredibly productive.
kind regards,

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by Ben »

mikenz66 wrote:A former soil-science prof at our local agricultural university used to get extremely frustrated with the "organic" manifesto. New Zealand has all kinds of nutrient deficiencies due to the geology (volcanic plateau in the North Island, other issues in the South), and successful agriculture is only possible because of the research that figured out what was required to balance the nutrients. He was all for using organic methods as much as possible, but to take the position that "pure organic" is "better" than adding necessary nutrients is just posturing.

I went to an interesting talk a couple of years ago about research on using particular flowers to attract natural predators (to reduce pesticide use). This is an idea that has been around for a while, but apparently not much research has been done and most of the folklore about it is not very accurate, so he wasn't particularly enthusiastic about "organic" manifestos. His hope was for horticultural industries here, such as wine, to be able to be completely pesticide free, which would be quite impressive...

:anjali:
Mike
Yes, I understand. I was asked to implement a permaculture design that was totally inappropriate for the climate, conditions and aspect of our vegetable garden. Expectations of maintaining it as an organic vegie garden was unrealistic given the proclivity of vast numbers of weeds that grow like triffids and the small amount of time I could devote to the garden. Thankfully, agricultural science has come a long way and has developed some decent solutions to otherwise backbreaking, monotonous and time consuming activities such as manual weeding.
kind regards,

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by ground »

tiltbillings wrote:I did not ask for your help, but given the nature of taste and food, the ceasing of taste is not going to happen forthe population as a whole, which was my point.
I see. "The population as a whole" actually is not within my scope - that is where the misunderstanding may have arisen from.

Kind regards
Sanghamitta
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
Location: By the River Thames near London.

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by Sanghamitta »

Well it should be. Marie Antoinette is not a Buddhist role model.
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.

Bhikku Bodhi.
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Is the food revolution just a great big fat lie?

Post by ground »

Sanghamitta wrote:Well it should be. Marie Antoinette is not a Buddhist role model.
You should quote. In case your remark refers to my post my answer is:

No.

The Buddha was a pragmatist. Not a world saviour.

Kind regards
Post Reply