Not sad, a great opportunity for a challenge many would not have.
Not sad.
Not thoughtless.
hanzze_ wrote:Not sad, a great opportunity for a challenge many would not have.
Reductor wrote:Your wife sounds like a deeply conflicted person; you and your daughter have my sympathy.
Reductor wrote:About that quip of leaving you and your daughter to your "things". When I read that in conjunction with the "brother-in-christ" and the past infidelity, you know what comes to mind?
puppha wrote:hanzze_ wrote:Not sad, a great opportunity for a challenge many would not have.
Yes, I do try to take it this way. But it's not easy...
probably means the same as 'brother in christ').Reductor wrote:My own wife often used to use the 'brother' and 'sister' tags for her fellow christians, although she does it far less now-a-days. Some people in our life will always be 'brother' and 'sister', though ('brother' is short for 'brother in the law', she saysprobably means the same as 'brother in christ').
puppha wrote:Reductor wrote:My own wife often used to use the 'brother' and 'sister' tags for her fellow christians, although she does it far less now-a-days. Some people in our life will always be 'brother' and 'sister', though ('brother' is short for 'brother in the law', she saysprobably means the same as 'brother in christ').
Is your wife a born-again christian as well? For how long?
Mine has been a born-again for almost a year and a half now. She is still quite in full swing of a rediscovered faith. Maybe it will wear out with time...
Reductor wrote:I have you beat, my good man! My wife has been a born again Christian since before we met.
---snip---
So for me, the possibility of my kids becoming Christian isn't at all small.

Return to Theravāda for the modern world
Registered users: Awarewolf, Billymac29, Bing [Bot], BuddhaSoup, Exabot [Bot], fivebells, Google [Bot], Lazy_eye, mettafuture, Modus.Ponens, photonist, reflection, retrofuturist, upekha