reflection wrote: Thinking sucks.

pegembara wrote:'This is not mine, this is not me, this is not my self.'
Viscid wrote:Discursive thinking in meditation has a rather undeserved poor reputation.
porpoise wrote:Viscid wrote:Discursive thinking in meditation has a rather undeserved poor reputation.
There seem to be many different approaches to meditation.

PeDr0 wrote:... it seems to me that everyone thinks they are an expert at meditation but no two people can agree on the correct methods.
PeDr0 wrote:What about asubha bhavana meditation, I have been told that this is a very important meditation practice, that definately involves thought. As does the metta bhavana.
PeDr0 wrote:Good question, it seems to me that everyone thinks they are an expert at meditation but no two people can agree on the correct methods.
dharmagoat wrote:A particular method is correct only for its specific purpose.
daverupa wrote: But this is absurd; so, of what benefit is this lack of thought, mentioned by so many?
porpoise wrote:daverupa wrote: But this is absurd; so, of what benefit is this lack of thought, mentioned by so many?
Possibly because insight is non-conceptual and thinking gets in the way?

porpoise wrote:pegembara wrote:'This is not mine, this is not me, this is not my self.'
Do you mean using this like a mantra, or just as a response to thoughts and feelings arising?
bodom wrote:Thinking has gotten a bad rap, but the texts speak of three ways of developing wisdom, one of which is using conceptual thought. There is wisdom obtained from listening to others (suta-maya panna), wisdom obtained from one's own thinking (cinta-maya panna) and wisdom obtained by meditation (bhavana-maya panna).
danieLion wrote:while i'm meditating i think "...is this jhana? which jhana is this...?" you know, stuff like that...
just kidding

porpoise wrote:Do you see these as a progression, ie first hearing, then internalising, then directly experiencing?
Sometimes we find in the texts a change in the order of suta-maya panna and cinta-maya panna. At times cinta-maya panna is mentioned first, followed by suta-maya panna and bhavana-maya panna. At times, suta-maya panna is followed by cinta-maya panna and bhavana-maya panna. But in both cases, bhavana-maya panna comes at the end and is of prime importance for the realisation of truth.

bodom wrote:porpoise wrote:Do you see these as a progression, ie first hearing, then internalising, then directly experiencing?
This according to Goenka:Sometimes we find in the texts a change in the order of suta-maya panna and cinta-maya panna. At times cinta-maya panna is mentioned first, followed by suta-maya panna and bhavana-maya panna. At times, suta-maya panna is followed by cinta-maya panna and bhavana-maya panna. But in both cases, bhavana-maya panna comes at the end and is of prime importance for the realisation of truth.
Return to Theravada Meditation
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests