Is everything kamma?

An open and inclusive investigation into Buddhism and spiritual cultivation
whynotme
Posts: 426
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:52 am

Is everything kamma?

Postby whynotme » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:09 am

Hi everyone

Is everything one meet, see, or everything happens because of kamma? It seems it is the attitude of mahayana while therevada ie, "Questions of Milinda" has stated that not everything is because of kamma but that book isn't Nikaya. What is your opinion?

Kamma is seen as cause and effect when the mind and intention are involved. Physical laws are not kamma but is it totally controlled by kamma? I.e some random objects may fall on one because of kamma (angulimala sutta). Is everyone I meet today is because of kamma?

Regards.
Please stop following me

User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 15729
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby retrofuturist » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:20 am

Greetings whynotme,

Kamma is action, and any sankhara (formation) is an action. Therefore, you could look to paticcasamuppada (dependent origination) for a detailed account of what occurs as a result of kamma.

If you don't adopt the detailed account, you'll have to instead adopt the simple account, and the risk here is that kamma all too easily becomes interpreted as something that is performed by a fixed agent (e.g. an atman - self, or puggala - person) who in turn receives the vipaka (fruit) of their action. The simple account may be useful to encourage moral behaviour in those who are unwilling or unable to comprehend the more detailed account, but if you're not careful, you'll find yourself coming up against all manner of contradictions.

Tread with care, and all the best.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"When we transcend one level of truth, the new level becomes what is true for us. The previous one is now false. What one experiences may not be what is experienced by the world in general, but that may well be truer. (Ven. Nanananda)

“I hope, Anuruddha, that you are all living in concord, with mutual appreciation, without disputing, blending like milk and water, viewing each other with kindly eyes.” (MN 31)

Never again...

whynotme
Posts: 426
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:52 am

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby whynotme » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:39 am

Ah thank you, sorry my bad, English isn't my first language and sometimes I tried to think in it so it is not clear. The Buddha and arahant do not create kamma, but without my own language, I can not discuss any clearer.

Well, I will wait for others to discuss and learn something (include the using of language)

Regards
Please stop following me

User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6009
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Cittasanto » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:50 am

whynotme wrote:Hi everyone

Is everything one meet, see, or everything happens because of kamma? It seems it is the attitude of mahayana while therevada ie, "Questions of Milinda" has stated that not everything is because of kamma but that book isn't Nikaya. What is your opinion?

Kamma is seen as cause and effect when the mind and intention are involved. Physical laws are not kamma but is it totally controlled by kamma? I.e some random objects may fall on one because of kamma (angulimala sutta). Is everyone I meet today is because of kamma?

Regards.


not all things that happen to us is due to our Kamma, sometimes it is disease (four of the reasons), Kamma, carelesness, changes in season, and harsh treatment as found in SN36.21

now although this list does include things which could be the result of past Kamma, not all are necessarily the result all the time.
I take season to also include natural cycles that result in storms and earthquakes & harsh treatment being what we or another does fwit.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
Blog, - Some Suttas Translated, Ajahn Chah.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."

User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6009
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Cittasanto » Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:05 am

whynotme wrote:Ah thank you, sorry my bad, English isn't my first language and sometimes I tried to think in it so it is not clear. The Buddha and arahant do not create kamma, but without my own language, I can not discuss any clearer.

Well, I will wait for others to discuss and learn something (include the using of language)

Regards

Hi,
The Buddha and Arahant do intentionally act although it is a particular type of Kamma known as Action that is neither black or white, it has no vipaka (fruit) which would condition a next life to is in a sense neutral.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
Blog, - Some Suttas Translated, Ajahn Chah.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."

User avatar
cooran
Posts: 8188
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby cooran » Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:37 am

whynotme wrote:Hi everyone

Is everything one meet, see, or everything happens because of kamma? It seems it is the attitude of mahayana while therevada ie, "Questions of Milinda" has stated that not everything is because of kamma but that book isn't Nikaya. What is your opinion?

Kamma is seen as cause and effect when the mind and intention are involved. Physical laws are not kamma but is it totally controlled by kamma? I.e some random objects may fall on one because of kamma (angulimala sutta). Is everyone I meet today is because of kamma?

Regards.

Hello whynotme,

This teaching by Mahasi Sayadaw may be of assistance:

• WHAT IS KARMA?
• KARMA AND VIPAKA
• WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF KARMA?
• CLASSIFICATION OF KARMA
• QUESTIONS ON THE THEORY OF KARMA
• NATURE OF KARMA
http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/karma.htm

with metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---

User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 2489
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Bhikkhu Pesala » Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:38 am

whynotme wrote:It seems it is the attitude of mahayana while therevada ie, "Questions of Milinda" has stated that not everything is because of kamma but that book isn't Nikaya. What is your opinion?

The Milindapañha was included in the Khudakanikāya by the Chattha Sangayana. I don't know if it was included earlier — presumably it was, or it might have disappeared by now. The Visuddhimagga, by way of contrast, is included in "Other books." Both of them are more like Commentaries than Suttas, but they are not classified as Aṭṭhakathā.

Namo Tassa Bhagavato Arahato Sammāsambuddhassa
Khuddakanikāye
Milindapañhapāḷi

Some Pāli texts were obviously later than the time of the Buddha. Even the Atthakanagara Sutta was taught by Ānanda after the passing away of the Buddha, but was included in the Majjhimanikāya at the First Council.

I don't think there is any difference of attitude between Mahāyāna and Theravāda — both teach that kamma is determinism.

The Milindapañha is only quoting older texts like the Moliyasivaka Sutta. No doubt, the reasons that it is included in the Khuddakanikāya is to ensure that it preserved for future generations. I spent several years of my early monk's life editing and abridging it to make it more accessible to modern western readers, who are almost always in a hurry, and want just the essential teachings as briefly as possible. The Debate of King Milinda is a useful introduction to key points of Buddhist doctrine. Hopefully, reading it will encourage people to look up the relevant passages in the Tipitaka and learn to find their way around the texts.
AIM WebsitePāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)

SayalayMaCandasobha
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby SayalayMaCandasobha » Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:23 am

Is everything one meet, see, or everything happens because of kamma?


As far as I understand, everything does not depend on kamma.
For example, matter is conditionned by 4 factors : kamma, mind (citta), seasonal conditions (utu) and food (āhāra).

You can find more explanations in the Abhidhammattha Sangaha (starting from p337)

http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/abhidhamma.pdf

WIth metta
Sayalay Ma Candasobha

whynotme
Posts: 426
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:52 am

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby whynotme » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:34 pm

Oh many thanks everyone, it is clear now.
The Buddha and Arahant do intentionally act although it is a particular type of Kamma known as Action that is neither black or white, it has no vipaka (fruit) which would condition a next life to is in a sense neutral.

Dear Sittasanto,

What make their actions different?

Regards
Please stop following me

User avatar
waimengwan
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby waimengwan » Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:34 pm

Thank you cittasanto for the information that not everything is due to karma.

Yes carelessness and harsh treatment can create causes for us to endure in the future.

Earthquakes can that be a change of season ? Spring to Winter I would say it is.

User avatar
Alobha
Posts: 559
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Alobha » Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:31 pm

Cittasanto wrote:not all things that happen to us is due to our Kamma, sometimes it is disease (four of the reasons), Kamma, carelesness, changes in season, and harsh treatment as found in SN36.21

now although this list does include things which could be the result of past Kamma, not all are necessarily the result all the time.
I take season to also include natural cycles that result in storms and earthquakes & harsh treatment being what we or another does fwit.


Yes, not everything that happens to us is due to our Kamma. But if it wasn't for our kamma, nothing bad would happen to us.
Depending on the perspective, one could argue that everything you suffer is due to your kamma. The kamma that brought you into this life with the many dangers and suffering - the karmic process (kamma-bhava) is just explaining that it's kamma why jati / birth occurs. If we wouldn't have the particular kamma to be born (in this or a lower realm), none of this would happen to us. From a level of ultimate truth, every kind of suffering can be prevented by reaching parinibbana and never being born again. No birth, no suffering, right? That's the deathless.

The Sivaka Sutta probably needs to be seen in the context. Moliyasivaka the wanderer heard from the brahmans that "there are some brahmans & contemplatives who are of this doctrine, this view: Whatever an individual feels — pleasure, pain, neither-pleasure-nor-pain — is entirely caused by what was done before."
Of course this means that Moliyasivaka asked the Buddha about whether pleasure, pain, neither-pleasure-nor-pain are determined in this life for a person by the past.
Which is not the case. And while once birth (by our kamma!) occurs, suffering is just inevitable to happen, not every pleasure and every suffering is caused by what was done before on a more basic level. Like weather, diseases etc.

So, on a meta-level kamma is the reason why we are born and therefore is also the reason for the suffering in this life. I think that this might be a standpoint from which people can argue that khamma is the reason for all our experience. But this easily gives the wrong impression if not set in the right context. People don't die in a tornado because they did something bad in the past, but rather because they're born in this realm where tornados are part of the natural dangers. It can be easily misunderstod if one would say "this person died in the tornado because of her/his kamma" - It would be more accurate to say "this person died in a tornado because all people who are born, die sooner or later."

That's how i understand it. Please correct me if i'm wrong here.

User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6009
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Cittasanto » Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:33 pm

whynotme wrote:Oh many thanks everyone, it is clear now.
The Buddha and Arahant do intentionally act although it is a particular type of Kamma known as Action that is neither black or white, it has no vipaka (fruit) which would condition a next life to is in a sense neutral.

Dear Sittasanto,

What make their actions different?

Regards

To be honest I do not know of any text which says it is this or that, but it is highly likely the lack of Clinging, & the lack of greed hatered & delusion.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
Blog, - Some Suttas Translated, Ajahn Chah.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."

User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6009
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Cittasanto » Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:38 pm

waimengwan wrote:Thank you cittasanto for the information that not everything is due to karma.

Yes carelessness and harsh treatment can create causes for us to endure in the future.

Earthquakes can that be a change of season ? Spring to Winter I would say it is.

It is a change in nature so I would argue that it is, all that is certain is that we will die, how is not determined untill the moment as far as I can tell in the canon.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
Blog, - Some Suttas Translated, Ajahn Chah.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."

User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6009
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Cittasanto » Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:12 pm

Hi Alobha
I maybe reading you wrong but that looks close to pre-destany at times to me.
Suffering itself is an action in regard to the second dart, but that doesn't mean that pain need be painful.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
Blog, - Some Suttas Translated, Ajahn Chah.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."

jagodage
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 7:11 am

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby jagodage » Wed Jul 22, 2015 11:23 am

Dear DW friends

There are Five causes for an action to happen.They are call Niyama Dhamma.

1 Utu Niyama
2 Dhamma Niyama
3 Kamma Niyama
4 Chitta Niyama
5 Beeja Niyama

Utu Niyama -These include actions due to Nature.Wind,Floods,Desert etc
Dhamma Niyama - These actions include tremor due Enlightment of Lord Buddha,Birth of Bodisattwa
Kamma Niyama -Action due to past action
Chitta Niyama - Action due to Chitta.Ex mind moments of chitta veetha.
Beeja Niyama- The birth of mango seed bears mango fruits.

So that Kamma Niyama is theoretically 1/5 of an action

With Metta

Jagodage

User avatar
Dhamma_Basti
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:53 am

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Dhamma_Basti » Sun Jul 26, 2015 2:58 pm

Cittasanto wrote:
whynotme wrote:Hi everyone

Is everything one meet, see, or everything happens because of kamma? It seems it is the attitude of mahayana while therevada ie, "Questions of Milinda" has stated that not everything is because of kamma but that book isn't Nikaya. What is your opinion?

Kamma is seen as cause and effect when the mind and intention are involved. Physical laws are not kamma but is it totally controlled by kamma? I.e some random objects may fall on one because of kamma (angulimala sutta). Is everyone I meet today is because of kamma?

Regards.


not all things that happen to us is due to our Kamma, sometimes it is disease (four of the reasons), Kamma, carelesness, changes in season, and harsh treatment as found in SN36.21

now although this list does include things which could be the result of past Kamma, not all are necessarily the result all the time.
I take season to also include natural cycles that result in storms and earthquakes & harsh treatment being what we or another does fwit.


:goodpost:

Once had the opportunity to listen toa Bhante from Sri Lanka giving a presentation about the topic of the nature of Kamma and he also adressed this issue with quite the same conclusion:
Everything due to Kamma?

Although it is Kamma that is decisive in one’s happiness and sorrow, Buddhism does not teach that every suffering and happiness is due to past Kamma.

This concept is described in Sīvaka Sutta (AN). Some suffering takes place due to one’s ill-health, some suffer due to change of seasons, some suffer due to their own sinful deeds while some suffer solely due to sins committed previously.

So much to speak about the view of the canon. I do not exactly recall if the mahayana teaching takes karma as 'everything due to karma' - I personally doubt it. Would certainly make sense to have a look at Vasubhandu for this question. Maybe I find time for that later today. :)
As far as I can see the main difference in the mahayana approach to karma is seen in the way karma and morality relate to each other. Just as a mahayana bodhisattva is allowed to kill some evil-minded person to prevent that person from committing a great sin, even if the bodhisattva by this action breaks sila and therefore causes bad karma for himself. Out of compassion this is legitimate.

User avatar
Vanda
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:56 am

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Vanda » Fri Aug 07, 2015 1:50 am

Kamma ceases with the ceasing of moha, dosa, and lobha. So don't trade in your undefiled mind for a deluded mind..!
:toilet:
“Don’t go by reports, by legends, by traditions, by scripture, by logical conjecture, by inference, by analogies, by agreement through pondering views, by probability, or by the thought, ‘This contemplative is our teacher.’ When you know for yourselves that, ‘These qualities are skillful; these qualities are blameless; these qualities are praised by the wise; these qualities, when adopted and carried out, lead to welfare and to happiness’ — then you should enter and remain in them.”
- Kalama Sutta, Anguttara Nikaya

Herbie
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 4:40 am

Re: Is everything kamma?

Postby Herbie » Sat Aug 08, 2015 7:04 am

I think there is a strong tendency in human intellect for simple explanations. This leads to all kinds of monisms "everything is variable term".
Inspiration is based on the exchange of different linguistic expressions.


Return to “Open Dhamma”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], lostitude and 5 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine