corrine wrote:Living in the United States of America, consumption and not moderation is the ideal, but that approach has not worked for individuals nor has it worked for us as a nation. We have become physically unhealthy as we also became financially unhealthy. So perhaps consuming less is simply a wise choice in all areas of life. Moderation is not a bad word. It is simply a rational choice.
corrine
Kim O'Hara wrote:If this thread is really all about food, perhaps it should be in the Wellness and Diet forum?
![]()
Kim
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:That doesn't seem to be working for me though — I don't eat much, but I am not getting enough exercise.
marc108 wrote:I would imagine with extended meditation and inactivity the basal metabolic rate would go wayyyyy down.
was living on one grain of rice per day while meditating almost continuously, wasn't he?
marc108 wrote:Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:That doesn't seem to be working for me though — I don't eat much, but I am not getting enough exercise.
I would imagine with extended meditation and inactivity the basal metabolic rate would go wayyyyy down.

danieLion wrote:Edit: I want it to be about how to consume less, not why we "should" consume less. But I'm not the only poster in this topic.
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings,danieLion wrote:Edit: I want it to be about how to consume less, not why we "should" consume less. But I'm not the only poster in this topic.
Reducing craving via the N8P, and specifically, regarding food and other requisites in the manner advised by the Buddha.
Metta,
Retro.
Return to Wellness, Diet & Fitness
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], HumbleThinker, JohnWB, Khalil Bodhi, Kim O'Hara, kiwi, Lazy_eye, Modus.Ponens, reflection, retrofuturist