couple of questions

A forum for beginners and members of other Buddhist traditions to ask questions about Theravāda (The Way of the Elders). Responses require moderator approval before they are visible in order to double-check alignment to Theravāda orthodoxy.
Post Reply
frankinnc
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:11 am

couple of questions

Post by frankinnc »

Hi, I've got a couple of questions for you guys:

I've been told that the only folks whom practice meditation in the theravada tradition are the monks..and that the lay-folk simply practice precepts and feed the monks. True? Explain?

While there's a lot of good folks practicing within the zen tradition, I've met many whom don't take the precepts very seriously (i,e, they drink alcohol, some are promiscous, reinterpret the precepts to mean what they want them to mean, etc.). This is a big- no-no in the theravada tradition, right?


Thanks
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: couple of questions

Post by Ben »

frankinnc wrote:Hi, I've got a couple of questions for you guys:

I've been told that the only folks whom practice meditation in the theravada tradition are the monks..and that the lay-folk simply practice precepts and feed the monks. True? Explain?
No, its actually a bit more complicated. There are a very large number of Theravada practitioners who practice meditation. As there are a large number of monks who do not. Certainly within some traditional Theravadin societies, traditionally the main practice for many lay people is the creation of merit. "Theravada" isn't monolithic and there's a lot of diversity within the school.
frankinnc wrote:While there's a lot of good folks practicing within the zen tradition, I've met many whom don't take the precepts very seriously (i,e, they drink alcohol, some are promiscous, reinterpret the precepts to mean what they want them to mean, etc.). This is a big- no-no in the theravada tradition, right?
I think you'll find that for most serious buddhists the precepts are extremely important. However, you'll find people engaging in unskilful activity wherever you go.
kind regards,

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Magoo
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 11:27 pm
Location: Australia

Re: couple of questions

Post by Magoo »

frankinnc wrote: I've been told that the only folks whom practice meditation in the theravada tradition are the monks..and that the lay-folk simply practice precepts and feed the monks. True? Explain?
Further to Bens repsonse which was very good. My understanding is that this statement could be historically true in certain traditional Buddhist countries such as Thailand. Whether this is still the case today, I am not so sure. It could be a generalisation. But I am from Perth Western Australia and Ajahn Brahm, Abbot of the Buddhist Society of Western Australia (Theravadin) and a buddhist monk of the Thai Forrest Tradition promotes meditation to all Dhamma practitioners as extremely important, in order to obtain the wisdom required to successfully travel this path.

With MeggaMetta
Eamonn
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: couple of questions

Post by Cittasanto »

frankinnc wrote:Hi, I've got a couple of questions for you guys:

I've been told that the only folks whom practice meditation in the theravada tradition are the monks..and that the lay-folk simply practice precepts and feed the monks. True? Explain?
untrue. Meditation is practiced by many lay followers of theravada, as well as many other forms of practice such as generosity, morality, and the rest.
the only difference between mendicants and lay-people can be precepts. Lay-followers can follow a life of renunciation, and the only real difference between some mendicants and lay-people is the amount of precepts & lifestyle.
While there's a lot of good folks practicing within the zen tradition, I've met many whom don't take the precepts very seriously (i,e, they drink alcohol, some are promiscous, reinterpret the precepts to mean what they want them to mean, etc.). This is a big- no-no in the theravada tradition, right?
It depends what Zen they follow. the rules where changed in japan so drinking is quite common.
but it depends upon the individual whether or not the try to act skilfully.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
User avatar
LonesomeYogurt
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:24 pm
Location: America

Re: couple of questions

Post by LonesomeYogurt »

frankinnc wrote:Hi, I've got a couple of questions for you guys:

I've been told that the only folks whom practice meditation in the theravada tradition are the monks..and that the lay-folk simply practice precepts and feed the monks. True? Explain?
This unfortunate system has partially developed over time in some countries; however, diligently practicing laypeople can be found in great numbers everywhere, especially in the West.
While there's a lot of good folks practicing within the zen tradition, I've met many whom don't take the precepts very seriously (i,e, they drink alcohol, some are promiscous, reinterpret the precepts to mean what they want them to mean, etc.). This is a big- no-no in the theravada tradition, right?
Although, as Ben said, there are those who engage in unwholesome behavior everywhere, I would venture to say that Theravada, on the whole, is far more strict on such matters.
Gain and loss, status and disgrace,
censure and praise, pleasure and pain:
these conditions among human beings are inconstant,
impermanent, subject to change.

Knowing this, the wise person, mindful,
ponders these changing conditions.
Desirable things don’t charm the mind,
undesirable ones bring no resistance.

His welcoming and rebelling are scattered,
gone to their end,
do not exist.
- Lokavipatti Sutta

Stuff I write about things.
Post Reply