you have been saying the same rubbish since page one where they were irrelivant also.
I am going to be as detailed as possible so you can hopefully understand why you should go somewhere else with this,
at any point what you are saying could be applicable, it could be true/applicable even if in hell, heaven, human planes. even if the Buddha was here today or not heard of it would be potentially true/applicable. it is potentially applicable/true no matter what the case/time is.
hence it is rejected in the scope of this thread as it does not show anything in regard to the questions which are all about what is different/worse/impossible for those who think it is so on the level the teachings are pointing to, hence its continued insistence is irrelevant and hence it is off topic.
you are not representing any argument I have made, or anything I have said or indicated so a straw man/red herring argument on your part, and they are pointless arguments to make as they only deal with what you proliferate not any argument or statement made.
I am not going over this again with you, post your topic in a thread it is relevant to, or start a new thread for it.
all further posts that are off topic will be reported.
Last edited by Cittasanto
on Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.