if your criticism is levelled at some 'new-agey' types I've met over the years, who follow a mish-mash of basically whatever suits their fancy (sometimes because it has a 'spiritual feel' to it) but while leaving out such inconvenient aspects of the spiritual path such as virtue or sense-regulation, then yes I agree with you.
But not all of those who have abandoned being defined by any one religious path or way, are like this. Some of them are just seeking the truth as best as they can, and along that journey are also quite willing to undergo many of the less glamorous or 'fun' aspects (such as sense-regulation), just as their more conventionally religious brothers and sisters do. Some of them find themselves forced to walk this lonely path of not 'belonging' to any one organized religion by their nature as it were, not fitting in to either the social structures, nor able to conform to any dogma whatsoever. But I do not judge such persons. (I'm not suggesting you were either, btw.) They too can be challenged and shaken to the core by the trials of the journey towards truth, just as anyone following a more structured and laid-out religious path can be.
Then the Blessed One, picking up a tiny bit of dust with the tip of his fingernail, said to the monk, "There isn't even this much form...feeling...
perception...fabrications...consciousness that is constant, lasting, eternal, not subject to change, that will stay just as it is as long as eternity."