If a lie saves someone or a sentient being lie
there is telling a deliberate lie and being non-discerning. just because you only speak that which is true doesn't mean you say everything at all times. picking the right time is a big part of being truthful.

barcsimalsi wrote:Thanks for reminding me about the self-annihilation. What will i do is always inspire by what will i get, it's just too hard to go against the natural tendency of my mind and pretend not to see the self.
Buckwheat wrote:If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. Lying always has a kammic consequence. You may not understand the magnitude of that consequence, so any lie under any conditions is very risky behavior. The Buddha stressed repeatedly that lying has very serious kammic consequences. The Buddha did not lie to save lives, to tell jokes, or as a "teacheing tool". He never condoned lying in any form (that I know of), so why does one think they know better than the Buddha?
I lie. Unfortunately, I do. It happens. I slip up and out pops a little lie. Sometimes out of jest. Sometimes to avoid an uncomfortable situation. But let us at least be honest with ourselves that there will be a kammic consequence, the Buddha was very straightforward in his advice on lying, and it is an unwholesome activity that the wise do not perform.
mikenz66 wrote:Hi Barcsimalsi,
I don't think it's a matter of "self-annihilation" or "pretend not to see the self". As I understand it, it's a matter of seeing through concepts such as self.
![]()
Mike

barcsimalsi wrote:mikenz66 wrote:Hi Barcsimalsi,
I don't think it's a matter of "self-annihilation" or "pretend not to see the self". As I understand it, it's a matter of seeing through concepts such as self.
![]()
Mike
Ervin wrote:By the way my answer is: It's always ok or right to lie, but its not always good. Wrong is nothing, everything is right but there is good and evil.
So the question should be: When is it good to lie?

mikenz66 wrote:hi barcsimalsi,barcsimalsi wrote:mikenz66 wrote:Hi Barcsimalsi,
I don't think it's a matter of "self-annihilation" or "pretend not to see the self". As I understand it, it's a matter of seeing through concepts such as self.
![]()
Mike
Sorry, was there something confusing about my reply?
http://www.aimwell.org/Books/Pesala/Ill ... sions.html
![]()
Mike
barcsimalsi wrote: My mind isn't ready to digest the self or non-self conception.

Registered users: barcsimalsi, Bing [Bot], Crazy cloud, Dan74, dxm_dxm, Feathers, fivebells, Google [Bot], Lazy_eye, piotr, purple planet, reflection