Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths - what can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
Post Reply
User avatar
gavesako
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:16 pm

Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by gavesako »

A recent article from Newsweek (despite the theistic interpretation of "God" and "Heaven" and "angels", the experience itself is very interesting and can be interpreted in a Buddhist way):

Proof of Heaven - by Dr. Eben Alexander
When a neurosurgeon found himself in a coma, he experienced things he never thought possible—a journey to the afterlife.


In the fall of 2008, however, after seven days in a coma during which the human part of my brain, the neocortex, was inactivated, I experienced something so profound that it gave me a scientific reason to believe in consciousness after death.
There is no scientific explanation for the fact that while my body lay in coma, my mind—my conscious, inner self—was alive and well. While the neurons of my cortex were stunned to complete inactivity by the bacteria that had attacked them, my brain-free consciousness journeyed to another, larger dimension of the universe: a dimension I’d never dreamed existed and which the old, pre-coma me would have been more than happy to explain was a simple impossibility. But that dimension—in rough outline, the same one described by countless subjects of near-death experiences and other mystical states—is there. It exists, and what I saw and learned there has placed me quite literally in a new world: a world where we are much more than our brains and bodies, and where death is not the end of consciousness but rather a chapter in a vast, and incalculably positive, journey. As a neurosurgeon, I did not believe in the phenomenon of near-death experiences. I grew up in a scientific world, the son of a neurosurgeon. I followed my father’s path and became an academic neurosurgeon, teaching at Harvard Medical School and other universities. I understand what happens to the brain when people are near death, and I had always believed there were good scientific explanations for the heavenly out-of-body journeys described by those who narrowly escaped death.
I’m not the first person to have discovered evidence that consciousness exists beyond the body. Brief, wonderful glimpses of this realm are as old as human history. But as far as I know, no one before me has ever traveled to this dimension (a) while their cortex was completely shut down, and (b) while their body was under minute medical observation, as mine was for the full seven days of my coma.
But I now understand that such a view is far too simple. The plain fact is that the materialist picture of the body and brain as the producers, rather than the vehicles, of human consciousness is doomed. In its place a new view of mind and body will emerge, and in fact is emerging already. This view is scientific and spiritual in equal measure and will value what the greatest scientists of history themselves always valued above all: truth.
(read more:)
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2 ... rlife.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Some of his descriptions of the vast dark space and the light orb and a female devata communicating with him would be worth comparing with the Suttas.

Regarding Rebirth Transmigration:
http://what-buddha-said.net/drops/Rebirth.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

An exploration of the Buddha's teaching on rebirth by Thanissaro Bhikkhu.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... birth.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bhikkhu Gavesako
Kiṃkusalagavesī anuttaraṃ santivarapadaṃ pariyesamāno... (MN 26)

Access to Insight - Theravada texts
Ancient Buddhist Texts - Translations and history of Pali texts
Dhammatalks.org - Sutta translations
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by Ben »

Thanks Bhante,

The response by Neuroscientist, Sam Harris, is worth reading.
And, unlike many neuroscientists and philosophers, I remain agnostic on the question of how consciousness is related to the physical world. There are, of course, very good reasons to believe that it is an emergent property of brain activity, just as the rest of the human mind obviously is. But we know nothing about how such a miracle of emergence might occur. And if consciousness were, in fact, irreducible—or even separable from the brain in a way that would give comfort to Saint Augustine—my worldview would not be overturned. I know that we do not understand consciousness, and nothing that I think I know about the cosmos, or about the patent falsity of most religious beliefs, requires that I deny this. So, although I am an atheist who can be expected to be unforgiving of religious dogma, I am not reflexively hostile to claims of the sort Alexander has made. In principle, my mind is open. (It really is.)

The rest is here: http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/this-must-be-heaven" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 7797
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by Aloka »

.

There was also a recent article by a neuroscientist in the UK press about it:

"Is the afterlife full of fluffy clouds and angels?

What does the neuroscientist Colin Blakemore make of an American neurosurgeon’s account of the afterlife? "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9598 ... ngels.html

kind regards

Aloka
User avatar
m0rl0ck
Posts: 1193
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by m0rl0ck »

Really great read thanks for the link :)
“The truth knocks on the door and you say, "Go away, I'm looking for the truth," and so it goes away. Puzzling.” ― Robert M. Pirsig
User avatar
m0rl0ck
Posts: 1193
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by m0rl0ck »

Aloka wrote:.



What does the neuroscientist Colin Blakemore make of an American neurosurgeon’s account of the afterlife? "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9598 ... ngels.html

kind regards

Aloka
What i find interesting about this is that when materialists discount these kinds of experiences, they quite often do it with venom and ridicule. I for one would find a less colorful discussion of the original article more worthy of consideration, but i suppose those most likely to reply to such an article are those most threatened by the possibilities and hyperbole of some sort is probably inevitable for that reason.
“The truth knocks on the door and you say, "Go away, I'm looking for the truth," and so it goes away. Puzzling.” ― Robert M. Pirsig
Mal
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:21 pm

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by Mal »

Blakemore is more dogmatic than Harris. He states bluntly:

"The odd perceptions are just the consequences of confused activity in the temporal lobes."

How can he say this? The "hard problem of consciousness" is far from solved so he can't delineate a causal link between the temporal lobes and conscious experience. He can, perhaps, say the experience happens at the same time as a certain kind of activity - but that's all.

Thanks for the quote from Sam Harris, Ben, it seems like a balanced view to me.

On the positive side, I like the way Blakemore ends his article with a good Zen story:

“What happens to the enlightened man at death?”
“Why ask me?” said Hakuin.
“Because you’re a Zen master.”
“Yes, but not a dead one.” :jumping:
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by Ben »

m0rl0ck wrote:i suppose those most likely to reply to such an article are those most threatened by the possibilities
not at all.
I am, and I am sure so are many people, completely open to the idea of an afterlife. However, the sorts of claims that Alexander makes should be examined very carefully.
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
helparcfun
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:11 am

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by helparcfun »

m0rl0ck wrote:
What i find interesting about this is that when materialists discount these kinds of experiences, they quite often do it with venom and ridicule.
This should not be surprising at all because, as has been pointed out by Sam Harris...."The evidence he provides for this claim is not only inadequate—it suggests that he doesn’t know anything about the relevant brain science."

It's the same with that other so called scientist (he's not really a scientist, he has a PhD in mechanical engineering), Walt Brown, who has written a book about the evidence for the biblical flood. He's, surprise surprise, already a creationist! http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Ian Stevenson is yet another one who has made some preposterous claims about re-incarnation. And he was only a psychiatrist!

These people, in my opinion, should know when to stop! Religious people like this should shy away from trying to "prove" scientifically things which they more than likely already believe anyway. I doubt very much that there has ever, or ever will be, a scientist who can credibly "prove" anything of the nature that Alexander was trying to prove.
User avatar
gavesako
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by gavesako »

As far as I can remember, Ian Stevenson only collected data about some "cases suggestive of reincarnation" following the scientific (statistical) method and filtering out those cases which were not very clear or the evidence was obscure. Going further than this, in his day, would mean being called a "bogus scientist".

Ajahn Jayasaro (a Western monk in Thailand) has talked about this issue. He said that given so many cases which suggest something like rebirth taking place (e.g. very small children remembering things they could not have learnt in this life), a true scientist who does not think that rebirth is a plausible explanation would have to come up with an alternative theory which should be at least as good as rebirth is. Is that what happens usually? No, those cases which have been described and recorded are merely ... ignored.
:shrug:
Bhikkhu Gavesako
Kiṃkusalagavesī anuttaraṃ santivarapadaṃ pariyesamāno... (MN 26)

Access to Insight - Theravada texts
Ancient Buddhist Texts - Translations and history of Pali texts
Dhammatalks.org - Sutta translations
User avatar
m0rl0ck
Posts: 1193
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by m0rl0ck »

Ben wrote:
m0rl0ck wrote:i suppose those most likely to reply to such an article are those most threatened by the possibilities
not at all.
I am, and I am sure so are many people, completely open to the idea of an afterlife. However, the sorts of claims that Alexander makes should be examined very carefully.
I agree, thats why less ridicule would serve better. Pointing and laughing are not an argument.
“The truth knocks on the door and you say, "Go away, I'm looking for the truth," and so it goes away. Puzzling.” ― Robert M. Pirsig
helparcfun
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:11 am

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by helparcfun »

gavesako wrote:As far as I can remember, Ian Stevenson only collected data about some "cases suggestive of reincarnation" following the scientific (statistical) method and filtering out those cases which were not very clear or the evidence was obscure. Going further than this, in his day, would mean being called a "bogus scientist".
Here's some more info re Ian Stevenson: From the article..."Stevenson himself admitted that he hadn't provided compelling evidence for reincarnation. What might be of some value, however, is to examine his data for recurrent features." http://www.skepdic.com/stevenson.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Just like Sam Harris, I too have an open mind concerning these issues. What I find unpalatable sometimes is the religious people who accuse the non-religious of having a closed mind on these issues when in fact I often find the reverse is true. History seems to be littered with examples of religious people finding so called "evidence" for one thing or another. Even the Pope apparently once proclaimed that the Big Bang theory was evidence of God's work!!
Mal
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:21 pm

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by Mal »

gavesako wrote: Ajahn Jayasaro (a Western monk in Thailand) has talked about this issue. He said that given so many cases which suggest something like rebirth taking place (e.g. very small children remembering things they could not have learnt in this life), a true scientist who does not think that rebirth is a plausible explanation would have to come up with an alternative theory which should be at least as good as rebirth is. Is that what happens usually? No, those cases which have been described and recorded are merely ... ignored.
:shrug:
Place them on the web and provide links?

What good examples are there of things they could not have learnt in this life?

Two of my favourite Buddhist authors are Ajahn Brahm and Matthieu Ricard. I find them incredibly strong and inspirational writers on meditation and Buddhism in general. But one place where they are very weak is on "Rebirth". Neither have had memories of previous lives. They both believe in it, but their books provide incredibly unconvincing examples.

Ajahn Brahm's example, in "Mindfulness, Bliss, and Beyond" comes down to "students have told me they have remembered things". Ricard's example, In "Monk & Philosopher" is of a young child who "remembered" an old retainer in a "rebirth search party". Hardly convincing! For example, ambitious parents could have prompted the child.

So if there are better examples, please point them out.
User avatar
Alex123
Posts: 4035
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:32 pm

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by Alex123 »

gavesako wrote:When a neurosurgeon found himself in a coma, he experienced things he never thought possible—a journey to the afterlife.
It is interesting that these "journeys" tend to occur in hospital when a person is pumped with drugs or when brain malfunctions...

How do we know that these memories are not by-product of the brain and/or its malfunction?
Mawkish1983
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:46 am
Location: Essex, UK

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by Mawkish1983 »

I used to be very troubled by these discussions. I've come to realise that whether there is an afterlife or not, whether consciousness is brain-made or not, whether rebirth occurs or not, I am still going to die. Regardless of my beliefs or otherwise, death will take me.

I'm coming to terms with that now. Nothing I have yet perceived is eternal or permanent.
User avatar
ancientbuddhism
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:53 pm
Location: Cyberia

Re: Neurosurgeon's visit to heaven - proof of afterlife?

Post by ancientbuddhism »

gavesako wrote: ...a true scientist who does not think that rebirth is a plausible explanation would have to come up with an alternative theory which should be at least as good as rebirth is.
Not necessarily. Richard Carrier humorously debunked this in Proving a Negative. A child can claim belief in God or Santa Claus, but an alternative proof is not required to dismiss these according to their logical fallacies.
I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes.” – Henry David Thoreau, Walden, 1854

Secure your own mask before assisting others. – NORTHWEST AIRLINES (Pre-Flight Instruction)

A Handful of Leaves
Post Reply