YOU CANNOT POST. OUR WEB HOSTING COMPANY DECIDED TO MOVE THE SERVER TO ANOTHER LOCATION. IN THE MEANTIME, YOU CAN VIEW THIS VERSION WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW POSTING AND WILL NOT SAVE ANYTHING YOU DO ONCE THE OTHER SERVER GOES ONLINE.

anatta and cetana and conditions for right view - Page 4 - Dhamma Wheel

anatta and cetana and conditions for right view

Discussion of Abhidhamma and related Commentaries

Moderator: Mahavihara moderator

dhamma follower
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:48 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby dhamma follower » Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:27 pm


User avatar
robertk
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby robertk » Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:42 pm


User avatar
beeblebrox
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby beeblebrox » Wed Nov 21, 2012 5:42 pm


User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 14947
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby mikenz66 » Wed Nov 21, 2012 6:46 pm


dhamma follower
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:48 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby dhamma follower » Thu Nov 22, 2012 2:02 am


User avatar
beeblebrox
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby beeblebrox » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:15 am


dhamma follower
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:48 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby dhamma follower » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:49 am


theY
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:07 pm
Contact:

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby theY » Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:55 am

Last edited by theY on Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Above message maybe out of date. Latest update will be in massage's link.
--------------------------------------------------
Tipitaka memorization is a rule of monks. It isn't just a choice. They must done it.
bahussuto nāma tividho hoti – nissayamuccanako, parisupaṭṭhāpako, bhikkhunovādakoti.

dhamma follower
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:48 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby dhamma follower » Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:40 pm


dhamma follower
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:48 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby dhamma follower » Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:58 pm


User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 14947
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby mikenz66 » Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:11 pm


theY
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:07 pm
Contact:

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby theY » Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:25 pm

Above message maybe out of date. Latest update will be in massage's link.
--------------------------------------------------
Tipitaka memorization is a rule of monks. It isn't just a choice. They must done it.
bahussuto nāma tividho hoti – nissayamuccanako, parisupaṭṭhāpako, bhikkhunovādakoti.

dhamma follower
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:48 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby dhamma follower » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:44 am

Last edited by dhamma follower on Sat Nov 24, 2012 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

dhamma follower
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:48 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby dhamma follower » Sat Nov 24, 2012 2:05 am


User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 14947
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby mikenz66 » Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:05 am


User avatar
robertk
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby robertk » Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:18 am


User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 14947
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby mikenz66 » Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:06 am

Hi Robert,

I don't really understand the points because I don't have that sort of knowledge of the Pali but I gather that the gist of the argument is inappropriate mixing of sutta and abhidhamma and/or commentarial terminology. Perhaps that gives you enough to go on.

:anjali:
Mike

dhamma follower
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:48 am

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby dhamma follower » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:24 pm


User avatar
beeblebrox
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby beeblebrox » Sat Nov 24, 2012 2:22 pm


User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 14947
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: anatta and cetana (will, intention): Kamma negated?

Postby mikenz66 » Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:00 pm



Return to “Abhidhamma”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine