The following msg criticizes some of what discussed in the PDF article attached to this link:
viewtopic.php?f=41&t=15084
Vimalaramsi's analysis and critique of Buddhaghosa is at best flawed, as we can see where it is discussed at length in this thread. viewtopic.php?f=14&t=7375&hilit=Buddhaghosa#p116920ignobleone wrote:Remember that Buddhaghosa came from Vedic background. And vedic meditation is that of wrong-concentration, which Vimalaramsi calls it as 'hypnosis'.
ignobleone wrote:1) Leigh Brasington - because I've found his teaching is not in accordance with the Buddha's instruction. (I have addressed this in other thread)
2) Shaila Catherine (never heard this name before) - because she mixes Buddhism with Vedic teaching.
These make it interesting to find out the actual Sayadaw's instructions pertaining to jhanas.
Ajahn Brahmavamso - Long ago I watched his interview video on youtube. In the video he said Ajahn Chah once called him 'stupid monk'. The reason may sound ridiculous but for me it makes his instructions quite worth further investigation.
Bhante Gunaratana - I don't think he is a western convert, since he should have been a Buddhist before he came to the US.
marc108 wrote:I'd be interested to read your critique of Mr Brasingtons technique. I've listened to quite a bit of Ms Catherines teaching and never heard it mixed with Vedic teaching. Her teachings are primarily Sutta & Vsm based, re: Pa Auk.
mikenz66 wrote:I think that ignobleone subscribes to the theory that Venerable Buddhaghossa (and others) were Brahmins,
mikenz66 wrote:and inserted vedic teachings into the Commentaries and the Visuddhimagga.
ignobleone wrote:mikenz66 wrote:I think that ignobleone subscribes to the theory that Venerable Buddhaghossa (and others) were Brahmins,
Who are the others?
ignobleone wrote:mikenz66 wrote:and inserted vedic teachings into the Commentaries and the Visuddhimagga.
Why don't you provide the otherwise proof?ignobleone wrote:The burden of proof is not on me.
One thing for sure you should be aware of, Vimalaramsi is not alone. You have to disagree with Thanissaro as well, not to mention some other monks (regardless western or eastern) and lay Buddhists.
ignobleone wrote:mikenz66 wrote:I think that ignobleone subscribes to the theory that Venerable Buddhaghossa (and others) were Brahmins,
Who are the others?mikenz66 wrote:and inserted vedic teachings into the Commentaries and the Visuddhimagga.
Why don't you provide the otherwise proof?
One thing for sure you should be aware of, Vimalaramsi is not alone. You have to disagree with Thanissaro as well, not to mention some other monks (regardless western or eastern) and lay Buddhists.
The only real purpose of this Vedic business is to try to dismiss Buddhaghosa without really doing the hard work of actually arguing against what he has said. It is a lazy and disreputable approach.Billymac29 wrote:The proof is on those who proclaim the vedic theory, not the nonvedic one... All vedic stories about budhaghosa are mere speculation... Those that try to use it as fact show their ignorance.
Registered users: Adrien, Bing [Bot], Birgit, BuddhaSoup, Coyote, felipe, Fluke, Google [Bot], greggorious, Lazy_eye, Mindstar, reflection