

And exactly how did the Buddha teach it? A ten day course, while hard work, is not a marathon.BuddhaSoup wrote:. . . Come back to Samatha-Vipasaana as the Buddha taught it.
tiltbillings wrote:And exactly how did the Buddha teach it? A ten day course, while hard work, is not a marathon.BuddhaSoup wrote:. . . Come back to Samatha-Vipasaana as the Buddha taught it.
That would be your consideration, but there is something to be said for getting a taste of practice that comes from an intensive retreat that one is not likely to get otherwise. Also, while a short intensive retreat may not be for everybody, the Goenka practice is certainly inline with what the Buddha taught.BuddhaSoup wrote:tiltbillings wrote:And exactly how did the Buddha teach it? A ten day course, while hard work, is not a marathon.BuddhaSoup wrote:. . . Come back to Samatha-Vipasaana as the Buddha taught it.
My suggestion was only that the Satipattana Sutta and Anapanasati Sutta, for example, express these teachings on meditation. That the OP might find benefit from learning meditation that does not require what I would consider a marathon (or to be more fair, a half-marathon) of sitting.
tiltbillings wrote: the Goenka practice is certainly inline with what the Buddha taught.
And what exactly is mainstream Theravada? Who is a good represntative it?Mr Man wrote:tiltbillings wrote: the Goenka practice is certainly inline with what the Buddha taught.
It is presented within the context of what the Buddha taught but the "technique" and format? The Goenka practice is not main stream Theravada.
There is no surprise with these retreats. The schedules are made known before participating in them, and there is plenty of information on the Web, so there is no excuse not to be informed. Also, this is not a marathon method, semi or otherwise.DAWN wrote:I am agree with Buddha Soap,
Peoples have to be informed about particularities of Goenka (semi-marathon) method. And after, they can take their own choice.
tiltbillings wrote:And what exactly is mainstream Theravada? Who is a good represntative it?Mr Man wrote:tiltbillings wrote: the Goenka practice is certainly inline with what the Buddha taught.
It is presented within the context of what the Buddha taught but the "technique" and format? The Goenka practice is not main stream Theravada.
Mr Man wrote:The Goenka practice is not main stream Theravada.
Because Geonka is not a monastic, it is not in line with Theravada, not in line with the Buddha's teachings?Mr Man wrote:tiltbillings wrote:And what exactly is mainstream Theravada? Who is a good represntative it?
Well no doubt there will be some variation in opinion here but to me it would have a strong conection to monasticism.
tiltbillings wrote:There is no surprise with these retreats. The schedules are made known before participating in them, and there is plenty of information on the Web, so there is no excuse not to be informed. Also, this is not a marathon method, semi or otherwise.DAWN wrote:I am agree with Buddha Soap,
Peoples have to be informed about particularities of Goenka (semi-marathon) method. And after, they can take their own choice.

Registered users: Ben, Bing [Bot], Buckwheat, cooran, Crazy cloud, Google [Bot], Kim O'Hara, Majestic-12 [Bot], ommunimuni, purple planet, Thanavuddho, vagrancy