Ben wrote:David N. Snyder wrote:I believe you may be analyzing it the other way around. Bhikkhu Bodhi states:Recently, however, several articulate teachers of meditation have argued down the validity of the dry insight approach, insisting that the jhānas are necessary for the successful development of insight at every stage. Their arguments usually begin by making a distinction between the standpoints of the Pāli Canon and the Commentaries. On this basis, they maintain that from the perspective of the Canon jhāna is needed to attain even stream-entry. The Nikāyas themselves do not address this problem in clear and unambiguous terms, and it is difficult to derive from them any direct pronouncement on its resolution.
Jhanas may be necessary for successful development of insight, but one need not be at such a high level just because jhana has occurred. Alara Kalama was not a Buddhist and attained the jhanas up to the third formless realm. Udaka Ramaputta was not a Buddhist and attained the jhanas up to the fourth formless realm.
And let's not forget Bahiya who was a master of the eight jhanas before he encountered the Buddha.
Registered users: Awarewolf, Bing [Bot], chownah, convivium, fig tree, Google [Bot], Hickersonia, Kamran, Kim O'Hara, kiwi, kmath, Lazy_eye, lewis454, Majestic-12 [Bot], Majjhima Patipada, Modus.Ponens, pilgrim, reflection, retrofuturist