Discourses with inferred meanings or explicit meanings

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism

Discourses with inferred meanings or explicit meanings

Postby Tom » Wed Dec 26, 2012 12:06 pm

"Bhikkhus, these two do not misrepresent the Tathāgata. Which two? One who explains a discourse whose meaning requires interpretation as a discourse whose meaning requires interpretation, and one who explains a discourse whose meaning is explicit as a discourse whose meaning is explicit. These two do not misrepresent the Tathāgata." -AN 2.25 from Bhikkhu Bodhi's translation of the Anguttara Nikaya

How can one know which discourses have meanings that require interpretation, and which discourses have meanings that are explicit?
Tom
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:50 pm

Re: Discourses with inferred meanings or explicit meanings

Postby Dmytro » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm

Hi ccharles,

This is explained in the book:

Francis Brassard
The concept of Bodhicitta in Śāntideva's Bodhícaryāvatāra

http://books.google.com.ua/books?id=t8W ... 4&lpg=PA74
User avatar
Dmytro
 
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:24 pm
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine


Return to General Theravāda discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests