

Raitanator wrote:This or that, it's still a bowl.

daverupa wrote:Raitanator wrote:This or that, it's still a bowl.
It's quite noteworthy, to notice how sense contact sparks papanca-sanna-sankha, isn't it?
Thanavuddho wrote:The fish is jumping from the small vehicle (hinayana) into the big vehicle (mahayana).
Only kidding. In reality the fish will hang in midair.
Thanavuddho wrote:They put a notice up on the website about me:
http://bodhisaddha.wix.com/home
It seems a bit silly. At least it makes the matter clear.
cooran wrote:Do not use that term on DhammaWheel.
TheravadaRaitanator wrote:cooran wrote:Do not use that term on DhammaWheel.
What would be a better term?
Mr Man wrote:TheravadaRaitanator wrote:cooran wrote:Do not use that term on DhammaWheel.
What would be a better term?
Raitanator wrote:In tibetan buddhism there's also practices same to Theravadin, and categorized in the same way, but to call it Theravada would be misleading, don't you think?

Thanavuddho wrote:The fish is jumping from the small vehicle (hinayana) into the big vehicle (mahayana).
Only kidding. In reality the fish will hang in midair.
No school of Buddhism called itself hinayana -- the discarded/garbage -- vehicle. Hinayana is at its root an ugly term of derision coined by the Mahayana. The term has its place within the Mahayana, but it is not an appropriate term for describing schools of Buddhism outside the Mahayana.BuddhaSoup wrote:
There was a hinayana...they're gone now for many centuries. People that intentionally use 'hinayana' for 'Theravada' are confused and silly.
BuddhaSoup wrote:I hope you stay in robes for many vassa, and find a longterm home in Australia.

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Coyote, dharmagoat, Exabot [Bot], Feathers, fivebells, Google [Bot], jabalí, Kim O'Hara, Majjhima Patipada, mikenz66, Modus.Ponens, onaquest, reflection, Sam Vara, Sekha, Zenainder