pascal wrote:Hi,
do you think becoming a school teacher would be a good career choice for a lay Buddhist practitioner? I'm currently considering this (even though the option to ordain as a monk is also on my table), and I'd like to know if there are any serious downsides to it, from your perspective.
pascal
pascal wrote:Hi,
do you think becoming a school teacher would be a good career choice for a lay Buddhist practitioner? I'm currently considering this (even though the option to ordain as a monk is also on my table), and I'd like to know if there are any serious downsides to it, from your perspective.
pascal

Billymac29 wrote:Im a teacher... The subject your teaching

daverupa wrote:Billymac29 wrote:Im a teacher... The subject your teaching
*you're
![]()

Cittasanto wrote:daverupa wrote:Billymac29 wrote:Im a teacher... The subject your teaching
*you're
![]()
is that revenge for all those boring lessons from your school days?
daverupa wrote:Billymac29 wrote:Im a teacher... The subject your teaching
*you're
![]()
Billymac29 wrote:daverupa wrote:Billymac29 wrote:Im a teacher... The subject your teaching
*you're
![]()
lol..... I'm a high school math teacher.... but thanks for the correction..
In the UK all teachers must be 'teachers of literacy', even at its most basic level, regardless of their subject. I'm physics teacher.
I disagree with you about the stress: choose not to be stressed. You're there for the children, not the governors.
I disagree with you about the behaviour problems: children will get away with what they are allowed (not 'aloud', as in your post) to get away with. In my - admittedly short - career so far, I've never had significant behaviour problems even though my colleagues have. Why? I have to assume it is because the children don't want to misbehave; either because they love physics so much (unlikely), or because they enjoy the lessons so much, or because they understand that even the most minor of misdemeanors will not be tolerated by me.
Thirteen weeks of holiday (or 'vacation' if you're American, I think) per year.
I don't believe it to be relevant, but yes, for seven weeks I was at just such a school.Billymac29 wrote:Have you ever taught at risk youths? Children with behavior problems? Children who have been kicked out of mainstream school because of behavior issues?
In the UK, science education is compulsory. Not a different type of student whatsoever. No-one made you choose your subject, but ALL subjects can be made engaging.Billymac29 wrote:You teach PHYSICS! Oh what joy I would have to teach physics in my new school.. Totally different type of students in those classes.
No, it doesn't.Billymac29 wrote:Like I said earlier. It all depends on what you teach, who you teach, and where you teach.
I didn't.Billymac29 wrote:You can only speak of your experience. Please don't try and judge me on mine.
No, it isn't (in the UK).Billymac29 wrote:Thirteen weeks of holiday (or 'vacation' if you're American, I think) per year.
this is incorrect
Mawkish1983 wrote:No, it isn't (in the UK).Billymac29 wrote:Thirteen weeks of holiday (or 'vacation' if you're American, I think) per year.
this is incorrect
Mawkish1983 wrote:I don't believe it to be relevant, but yes, for seven weeks I was at just such a school.
Mawkish1983 wrote:In the UK, science education is compulsory. Not a different type of student whatsoever.
Mawkish1983 wrote:No-one made you choose your subject, but ALL subjects can be made engaging.
Like I said earlier. It all depends on what you teach, who you teach, and where you teach.
Mawkish1983 wrote:No, it doesn't.
Billymac29 wrote:You can only speak of your experience. Please don't try and judge me on mine.
Mawkish1983 wrote:I didn't.
Mawkish1983 wrote:In my - admittedly short - career so far, I've never had significant behaviour problems even though my colleagues have. Why?
Registered users: Alex123, Bing [Bot], BlackBird, BuddhaSoup, convivium, cooran, Coyote, Doshin, EmptyShadow, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Lazy_eye, mettafuture, mikenz66, photonist, puppha, purple planet, retrofuturist