David N. Snyder wrote:what the Buddha wanted.
Sekha wrote:it was not entirely his wish to create the nuns order. I recognize however, that following the same line of reasoning, one would conclude that it was not entirely his wish to teach the Dhamma, as he waited for Brahma Sahampati to call for it first,
Sekha wrote:although it is even more difficult to assess the veracity of that super-normal encounter.
"Gotami, the qualities of which you may know, 'These qualities lead to passion, not to dispassion; to being fettered, not to being unfettered; to accumulating, not to shedding; to self-aggrandizement, not to modesty; to discontent, not to contentment; to entanglement, not to seclusion; to laziness, not to aroused persistence; to being burdensome, not to being unburdensome': You may categorically hold, 'This is not the Dhamma, this is not the Vinaya, this is not the Teacher's instruction.'

perkele wrote:In any case, he did initiate the bhikkhuni order. And he could not do that without "wanting" it in the end. It was his intention in the end, to let this happen, and so it happened. So that, I think, is quite an unequivocal point.
What happened over the course of 2500 years is probably a bit more difficult to understand, and I think, not very much to be meaningfully related to what and what not the Buddha wanted either way.
perkele wrote:I'm neither for nor against bhikkhuni ordination.
perkele wrote:it's not good to be political about it.
perkele wrote:I wish for all who want to end suffering that they find the best circumstances for that. No matter what clothes they wear, no matter whether they're male or female, no matter whether people respect them or not. It becomes more difficult when these points are important.
perkele wrote:The Buddha-Sasana can't last forever. In whichever way it persists, we should try to make the best of it.
shaunc wrote:I don't really understand this. As far as I know the Thai tradition has always had nuns. Some are only part-time & when they leave the temple go home to husbands, kids & jobs. But some are full-time nuns. The only visible difference being the shaved heads of the full-time nuns. The ones that I have seen, unlike the ones in the photograph wear white. Would someone be able toexplain the difference of them all to me.
shaunc wrote:I don't really understand this. As far as I know the Thai tradition has always had nuns. Some are only part-time & when they leave the temple go home to husbands, kids & jobs. But some are full-time nuns. The only visible difference being the shaved heads of the full-time nuns. The ones that I have seen, unlike the ones in the photograph wear white. Would someone be able toexplain the difference of them all to me.
Mr Man wrote:It's rather an odd litle article with no explanation - A bit like the sighting of a UFO or the Loch Ness monster.
GraemeR wrote:Mr Man wrote:It's rather an odd litle article with no explanation - A bit like the sighting of a UFO or the Loch Ness monster.
I think some Thai men consider seeing nuns in orange robes is about as strange as seeing the Loch Ness Monster!
You need to consider it in the context of Thai culture
Graham
Mr Man wrote:But don't you think the Bangkok Post could have demystified the story a bit Graham? They have had bhikkhuni related stories before.
Return to Ordination and Monastic Life
Registered users: Bhikkhu Pesala, Bing [Bot], binocular, cherrytigerbarb, Crazy cloud, Google [Bot], Kamran, khlawng, Kim O'Hara, mikenz66, purple planet, rahul3bds, retrofuturist, Vern Stevens