There is the case, monk, where a monk has heard, 'All things are unworthy of attachment.' Having heard that all things are unworthy of attachment, he directly knows every thing. Directly knowing every thing, he comprehends every thing. Comprehending every thing, he sees all themes[2] as something separate.SN35.80
Theravada is immense, though not as immense as some other schools. Quite frankly, you can make this as complicated or as simple as you want. To re-word what you are asking: What is the bare minimum one needs to know and needs to do? (But even that will take work.)alan... wrote:as small as you can get it but have it still be a complete path that someone could follow without anything else.
the theravada dhamma is IMMENSE, i'm constantly trying to whittle it down to something that i can wrap my head around.
a book?
a practice?
a certain school?
alan... wrote:a book?
a practice?
a certain school?

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:Be mindful.

daverupa wrote:Distilling the Dhamma means thinking with it, not thinking about it
"It would be good, lord, if the Blessed One would teach me the Dhamma in brief such that, having heard the Dhamma from the Blessed One, I might dwell alone, secluded, heedful, ardent, & resolute."
"Gotami, the qualities of which you may know, 'These qualities lead to passion, not to dispassion; to being fettered, not to being unfettered; to accumulating, not to shedding; to self-aggrandizement, not to modesty; to discontent, not to contentment; to entanglement, not to seclusion; to laziness, not to aroused persistence; to being burdensome, not to being unburdensome': You may categorically hold, 'This is not the Dhamma, this is not the Vinaya, this is not the Teacher's instruction.'
"As for the qualities of which you may know, 'These qualities lead to dispassion, not to passion; to being unfettered, not to being fettered; to shedding, not to accumulating; to modesty, not to self-aggrandizement; to contentment, not to discontent; to seclusion, not to entanglement; to aroused persistence, not to laziness; to being unburdensome, not to being burdensome': You may categorically hold, 'This is the Dhamma, this is the Vinaya, this is the Teacher's instruction.'" http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html

alan... wrote:...the theravada dhamma is IMMENSE...

LonesomeYogurt wrote:Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:Be mindful.
Gah, you had to top me!

alan... wrote:as small as you can get it but have it still be a complete path that someone could follow without anything else.
tiltbillings wrote:Theravada is immense, though not as immense as some other schools. Quite frankly, you can make this as complicated or as simple as you want. To re-word what you are asking: What is the bare minimum one needs to know and needs to do? (But even that will take work.)alan... wrote:as small as you can get it but have it still be a complete path that someone could follow without anything else.
the theravada dhamma is IMMENSE, i'm constantly trying to whittle it down to something that i can wrap my head around.
a book?
a practice?
a certain school?
David N. Snyder wrote:alan... wrote:a book?
Anguttara Nikayaa practice?
Samatha-Vipassanaa certain school?
Theravada.
alan... wrote:anguttara? i would have guessed samyutta. i suppose both are jam packed with small, easily digested wisdom. what makes you pick anguttara over samyutta out of curiosity?
(see link below in my signature)Registered users: Ben, bga, Bing [Bot], cooran, Google [Bot], khlawng, Kim O'Hara, Lazy_eye, mettafuture, mikenz66, retrofuturist, vagrancy, Zimesky