Casual discussion amongst spiritual friends.
by Sam Vara » Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:30 am
Let's send the man a little good will, whatever we think of his organisations and beliefs. He is 85, and has admitted to being mentally and physically too frail to do what he presumably thinks is the most important task in the world.
Fully worn out is this body, a nest of disease, and fragile. This foul mass breaks up, for death is the end of life.
Something very similar will come to all of us.
-

Sam Vara
-
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
-
by Jay1 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:41 pm
LonesomeYogurt wrote:Jay1 wrote:The website is biased.
The website doesn't exist to give a comprehensive overview of all events in the Bible. It simply showcases, quite effectively, I might add, the depths of cruelty to which Jehovah sinks to on multiple occasions. No amount of positives on the other side could give pardon.
It showcases a fundamental misunderstanding of the Christian faith. It doesn't expose evil acts of God because it does not understand scripture.
-

Jay1
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:37 pm
-
by beeblebrox » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:15 pm
Sam Vara wrote:Let's send the man a little good will, whatever we think of his organisations and beliefs. He is 85, and has admitted to being mentally and physically too frail to do what he presumably thinks is the most important task in the world.
Fully worn out is this body, a nest of disease, and fragile. This foul mass breaks up, for death is the end of life.
Something very similar will come to all of us.
Hi Sam,
Thank you for making this post.
Kim O'Hara wrote:LonesomeYogurt wrote:The website doesn't exist to give a comprehensive overview of all events in the Bible. It simply showcases, quite effectively, I might add, the depths of cruelty to which Jehovah sinks to on multiple occasions. No amount of positives on the other side could give pardon.
Just how can a non-existent disembodied intelligence be cruel?
Exactly... I think this sort of thing is a bit unfortunate. It's a bizarre world that we live in.

-

beeblebrox
-
- Posts: 709
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:41 pm
-
by Coyote » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:23 pm
Personally I find the history of the modern Catholic church fascinating an await to see which direction the next pope takes the church. The man was a great scholar and theologian (so I'm told) so it will be interesting to see where his influence takes Catholic doctrine and practice. I think we live in "interesting times" with regards to traditional ecclesiastical Christianity. Just from my nerdy historian point of view it has been really interesting watching from the sidelines to see how he has influenced the church and how he contended with his predecessors legacy, not to mention the various scandals ect. It's a pity this history has to happen in the real world though, it's easy to forget that.
If I misrepresent the Dhamma, please point it out. I am here to learn
-
Coyote
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:42 pm
- Location: Wales - UK
-
by Jason » Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:09 am
Personally, I can't say that I'm sad to the pontiff — who, among other things, called Buddhism "self-indulgent eroticism" and thought it was OK to say that condoms
increase the problem of AIDS in a country where 22.5 million people are living with HIV — go. Not really a huge fan, although I'm sad to see that it's because his health is declining.
Like massive boulders,
mountains pressing against the sky,
moving in from all sides,
crushing the four directions,
so aging and death
come rolling over living beings:
noble warriors, brahmans, merchants,
workers, outcastes, & scavengers.
They spare nothing.
They trample everything.
- SN 3.25
Last edited by
Jason on Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

Jason
-
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Earth
-
by ground » Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:38 am
Lucky Pope, he is able to let go being aware that capacities are limited in the sphere of aging and death. Wisdom is independent of religion.

-

ground
-
- Posts: 2569
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am
-
by alan » Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:08 am
In a more rational world, the Pope would be a subject of mockery.
Take over the Vatican, sell it's assets, and spread that money to all the poor families in the third world who have suffered from the idiotic policy that bans contraception. That's what we should do.
-
alan
-
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:14 am
- Location: Miramar beach, Fl.
-
by tiltbillings » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:13 am
Buddhism
Though his advent was congratulated by Buddhist leaders around the world, [3][4] critics remembered that in March 1997 Cardinal Ratzinger predicted that Buddhism would, over the coming century, replace Marxism as the main "enemy" of the Catholic Church. Some also criticized him for calling Buddhism an "autoerotic spirituality" that offered "transcendence without imposing concrete religious obligations", though that might be a mistranslation from the French auto-erotisme, which more properly translates to self-absorption, or narcissism.[37][38] Also the quote did not address Buddhism as such, but rather about how Buddhism "appears" to those Europeans who are using it to obtain some type of self-satisfying spiritual experience.[39] -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology_o ... nedict_XVI
What is the use of his knowledge
pertaining to the number of insects in the whole world?
Rather, inquire into his knowledge of
that which is to be practised by us
-- Dharmakirti
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond.
SN I, 38.
Níl sa saol seo ach ceo
There is naught in this life but mist
Is ní bheimid beo ach seal beag gearr.
And we will not be alive but a short hard time.
-

tiltbillings
-
- Posts: 16727
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
- Location: Turtle Island
by jonno » Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:52 am
Hi all.I've no intention to enter into any contraversary , or to criticise anyone. I simply feel that as Buddhists we should practice forgiveness understanding and compassion for all beings. Namaste Jonno
-
jonno
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:34 pm
-
by James the Giant » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:11 am
Waa-hee!
In 1990 Ratzinger commented on the Galileo affair, and quoted philosopher Paul Feyerabend as saying that the Church's verdict against Galileo had been "rational and just".
The Pope about Harry Potter books:
"these are subtle seductions which act imperceptibly and thereby deeply, and dissolve Christianity in the soul before it can grow properly."
Distributing condoms to help prevent HIV:
"would result in at least the facilitation of evil".
About Gay and Lesbian people adopting children:
"Allowing children to be adopted by persons living in such unions would actually mean doing violence to these children."
On LGBT rights:
"The Archdiocese should withdraw all support from any group, which does not unequivocally accept the teaching of the Magisterium concerning the intrinsic evil of homosexual activity."
And
"although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder."
Then,
saturated with joy,
you will put an end to suffering and stress.
SN 9.11
-

James the Giant
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:41 am
- Location: Perth, Australia
-
by tiltbillings » Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:00 pm
jonno wrote:Hi all.I've no intention to enter into any contraversary , or to criticise anyone. I simply feel that as Buddhists we should practice forgiveness understanding and compassion for all beings. Namaste Jonno
One can forgive him, but that does not mean that one cannot also reasonably critique some very atavistic teachings, pronouncement and such.
What is the use of his knowledge
pertaining to the number of insects in the whole world?
Rather, inquire into his knowledge of
that which is to be practised by us
-- Dharmakirti
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond.
SN I, 38.
Níl sa saol seo ach ceo
There is naught in this life but mist
Is ní bheimid beo ach seal beag gearr.
And we will not be alive but a short hard time.
-

tiltbillings
-
- Posts: 16727
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
- Location: Turtle Island
by GraemeR » Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:03 pm
Well he was no friend of Buddhism and I hope his successor may be more sensitive.
" Perhaps one of his most worrying comments was regarding Buddhism, which he called an "autoerotic spirituality" that seeks "transcendence without imposing concrete religious obligations." He also made the point that, by the year 2000, Buddhism would replace Marxism as the church's biggest foe. (See National Catholic Reporter Vol. 35, No. 17, Feb. 27, 1999). Perhaps he was not aware that Marxism had all but disappeared by 1990. He has also made other blunders such as quoting a former Byzantine monarch's comment regarding Islam at a particularly insensitive time."
http://cathar-martyr.tripod.com/inquisition.htmlGraham
-

GraemeR
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:20 am
- Location: Thailand
-
by GraemeR » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:39 am
Dear all
I haven't seen positive confirmation of this, but it's circulating quite widely:
http://itccs.org/An arrest warrant may have precipitated his resignation
With Metta
Graham
-

GraemeR
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:20 am
- Location: Thailand
-
by Buckwheat » Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:23 pm
Kim O'Hara wrote:LonesomeYogurt wrote:Jay1 wrote:The website is biased.
The website doesn't exist to give a comprehensive overview of all events in the Bible. It simply showcases, quite effectively, I might add, the depths of cruelty to which Jehovah sinks to on multiple occasions. No amount of positives on the other side could give pardon.
Just how can a non-existent disembodied intelligence be cruel?
Kim

Sotthī hontu nirantaraṃ - May you forever be well.
-
Buckwheat
-
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 12:39 am
- Location: California USA
-
by Buckwheat » Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:40 pm
tiltbillings wrote:Buddhism
Though his advent was congratulated by Buddhist leaders around the world, [3][4] critics remembered that in March 1997 Cardinal Ratzinger predicted that Buddhism would, over the coming century, replace Marxism as the main "enemy" of the Catholic Church. Some also criticized him for calling Buddhism an "autoerotic spirituality" that offered "transcendence without imposing concrete religious obligations", though that might be a mistranslation from the French auto-erotisme, which more properly translates to self-absorption, or narcissism.[37][38] Also the quote did not address Buddhism as such, but rather about how Buddhism "appears" to those Europeans who are using it to obtain some type of self-satisfying spiritual experience.[39] -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology_o ... nedict_XVI
So, he basically said the watered down Buddhism taught in many western dharma centers is selfish feel-good-ism? Ain't there some truth to that?
Sotthī hontu nirantaraṃ - May you forever be well.
-
Buckwheat
-
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 12:39 am
- Location: California USA
-
by tiltbillings » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:17 pm
Buckwheat wrote:
So, he basically said the watered down Buddhism taught in many western dharma centers is selfish feel-good-ism? Ain't there some truth to that?
Which Dhamma centers would those be? And, no, he did not specify "watered down Buddhism taught in many western dharma centers."
What is the use of his knowledge
pertaining to the number of insects in the whole world?
Rather, inquire into his knowledge of
that which is to be practised by us
-- Dharmakirti
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond.
SN I, 38.
Níl sa saol seo ach ceo
There is naught in this life but mist
Is ní bheimid beo ach seal beag gearr.
And we will not be alive but a short hard time.
-

tiltbillings
-
- Posts: 16727
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
- Location: Turtle Island
by GraemeR » Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:50 am
tiltbillings wrote:Which Dhamma centers would those be? And, no, he did not specify "watered down Buddhism taught in many western dharma centers."
I went to excellent Buddhist Centres in Britain, they are much better than most I have seen here in Thailand, where good Wats seem to be the exception, rather than the rule. Buddhism here can be watered down with Hinduism, Taoism animism etc in may temples.
In my view the Pope just loves to hate - Buddhists, Muslims, anyone who doesn't follow his dogma. To me his use of terms like 'Enemy' is simply awful.
With Metta
Graham
-

GraemeR
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:20 am
- Location: Thailand
-
by Buckwheat » Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:13 am
tiltbillings wrote:Buddhism
Though his advent was congratulated by Buddhist leaders around the world, [3][4] critics remembered that in March 1997 Cardinal Ratzinger predicted that Buddhism would, over the coming century, replace Marxism as the main "enemy" of the Catholic Church. Some also criticized him for calling Buddhism an "autoerotic spirituality" that offered "transcendence without imposing concrete religious obligations", though that might be a mistranslation from the French auto-erotisme, which more properly translates to self-absorption, or narcissism.[37][38] Also the quote did not address Buddhism as such, but rather about how Buddhism "appears" to those Europeans who are using it to obtain some type of self-satisfying spiritual experience.[39] -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology_o ... nedict_XVI
If the Pope was referring to Buddhism in general, he was either neglecting Kamma or ignorant of the teaching. However, the framework around this quote indicates he is referring to what is seen in European dharma circles. Due to my ignorance, I will have to defer to others regarding the respectability of European dharma centers. What I have seen is that in California and Utah several Mahayana dharma centers have a pretty weak respect for the workings of kamma, which is what drove me to Theravada in the first place. (There are also some Mahayana centers which command my utmost respect, but I was already "converted" to Theravada.)
FYI - I don't like the Pope. I am kind of glad he is stepping down, although saddened as I realize they will probably just select another Pope I don't like.

Sotthī hontu nirantaraṃ - May you forever be well.
-
Buckwheat
-
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 12:39 am
- Location: California USA
-
by Kusala » Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:42 pm
Buckwheat wrote:tiltbillings wrote:Buddhism
Though his advent was congratulated by Buddhist leaders around the world, [3][4] critics remembered that in March 1997 Cardinal Ratzinger predicted that Buddhism would, over the coming century, replace Marxism as the main "enemy" of the Catholic Church. Some also criticized him for calling Buddhism an "autoerotic spirituality" that offered "transcendence without imposing concrete religious obligations", though that might be a mistranslation from the French auto-erotisme, which more properly translates to self-absorption, or narcissism.[37][38] Also the quote did not address Buddhism as such, but rather about how Buddhism "appears" to those Europeans who are using it to obtain some type of self-satisfying spiritual experience.[39] -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology_o ... nedict_XVI
If the Pope was referring to Buddhism in general, he was either neglecting Kamma or ignorant of the teaching. However, the framework around this quote indicates he is referring to what is seen in European dharma circles. Due to my ignorance, I will have to defer to others regarding the respectability of European dharma centers. What I have seen is that in California and Utah several Mahayana dharma centers have a pretty weak respect for the workings of kamma, which is what drove me to Theravada in the first place. (There are also some Mahayana centers which command my utmost respect, but I was already "converted" to Theravada.)
FYI - I don't like the Pope. I am kind of glad he is stepping down, although saddened as I realize they will probably just select another Pope I don't like.

Catholic encyclopedia on Buddhism...
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03028b.htm "The fundamental tenets of Buddhism are marked by grave defects that not only betray its inadequacy to become a religion of enlightened humanity, but also bring into bold relief its inferiority to the religion of Jesus Christ. In the first place, the very foundation on which Buddhism rests—the doctrine of karma with its implied transmigrations—is gratuitous and false...""Another fatal defect of Buddhism is its false pessimism. A strong and healthy mind revolts against the morbid view that life is not worth living, that every form of conscious existence is an evil. Buddhism stands condemned by the voice of nature the dominant tone of which is hope and joy. It is a protest against nature for possessing the perfection of rational life. The highest ambition of Buddhism is to destroy that perfection by bringing all living beings to the unconscious repose of Nirvana. Buddhism is thus guilty of a capital crime against nature, and in consequence does injustice to the individual...""Buddhism has accomplished but little for the uplifting of humanity in comparison with Christianity. One of its most attractive features, which, unfortunately, has become wellnigh obsolete, was its practice of benevolence towards the sick and needy. Between Buddhists and Brahmins there was a commendable rivalry in maintaining dispensaries of food and medicine. But this charity did not, like the Christian form, extend to the prolonged nursing of unfortunates stricken with contagious and incurable diseases, to the protection of foundlings, to the bringing up of orphans, to the rescue of fallen women, to the care of the aged and insane. Asylums and hospitals in this sense are unknown to Buddhism..."
-

Kusala
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am
-
Return to Lounge
Who is online
Registered users: amata_dhamma, Bhikkhu Pesala, Bhikkhu_Samahita, Billymac29, Bing [Bot], BuddhaSoup, Coyote, Dmytro, EmptyShadow, enlightened2013, Feathers, fivebells, gavesako, Google [Bot], Khalil Bodhi, kiwi, kmath, Majestic-12 [Bot], mettafuture, mikenz66, Mindstar, Modus.Ponens, piotr, polarbuddha101, reflection, Sam Vara