I can see how you got from A to B, but I wouldn't regard that which represents "life" and that which is "fabricated and willed" as synonymous... especially in the context of an arahant.
Metta,
Retro.
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Kirk,
I can see how you got from A to B, but I wouldn't regard that which represents "life" and that which is "fabricated and willed" as synonymous... especially in the context of an arahant.
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Kirk,
The SN 35.145 extract on old kamma sounds phenomenlogical in intent (i.e. kaya-sankhara, mano-sankhara), whereas the MN 140 extract on death sounds ontological in intent.
Personally wouldn't use an ontological statement as the basis for affirming or rejecting a phenomenological statement. That's all.
kirk5a wrote:Is there any guidance from the suttas on differentiating between "phenomenological statements" and "ontological statements"?
Return to General Theravāda discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], cooran, Google [Bot], Hickersonia, Lazy_eye, Majestic-12 [Bot], Modus.Ponens, new_student_ejs_135, polarbuddha101, reflection, retrofuturist