pilgrim wrote:I can't believe the bunch of sour faced prudes we have here.
pilgrim wrote:I can't believe the bunch of sour faced prudes we have here.
tiltbillings wrote:Actually, thank you, you have made my point, again.Cittasanto wrote:well I certainly wasn't saying anything remotely related to this and your opinion of levity, dourness, or clinging.But: Oh, the inhumanity of it all. Naughty Ven B. Shame, shame, shame and more shame, scandlaizing us dour Buddhists with levity. Heavens to betsy, what are we to do? Maybe get over it, let it go, move on, tend to our own business, look within.
you have accused two people with no ground. but heaven forbid anyone engage with the outside world or have an opinion about it.
lets all find a hole and hide from any expectation of conduct and benefit we gain from our livelihood.
Hmmm. A trick question.Cittasanto wrote:
and what point is that?
m0rl0ck wrote:Some of you all are just hilarious![]()
I thought about this at work today and came to the conclusion that while i may enjoy the good humoured cheerfulness of his talks on occasion 7 days of unruffled, cheerful, equanimity would probably drive me up a wall. If i won id have to send him out on a lot of errands or something.
I bet he is like that first thing in the morning too.
EDIT: you think he can cook worth a darn? do windows maybe?
LonesomeYogurt wrote:Yeah, I like Ajahn Brahm but this is my first thought as well - I don't think I could handle a week of that. Part of me wonders how much fun it would be to set up an equanimity obstacle course and see what manner of annoyances he could endure before snapping and slapping me.
tiltbillings wrote:I have said as much, if not more than, I should have and my only response to all of this kerfuffle is:
tiltbillings wrote:A better use for this thread rather than the finger wagging is:
Too much fun finger wagging at the those who think monks should be dour.Mr Man wrote:Cuould't you put it down?
There is a fair bit of finger wagging go on all around here.
tiltbillings wrote:Too much fun finger wagging at the those who think monks should be dour.Mr Man wrote:Cuould't you put it down?
There is a fair bit of finger wagging go on all around here.
tiltbillings wrote:Hmmm. A trick question.Cittasanto wrote:
and what point is that?
Unquestionably, but I wonder if they need to suffer under conformity to the symbolic significance, which seems to be what this thread is really about.Mr Man wrote:
I don't know if they have to be dour but they do have great symbolic significance (a manifestation of the tripple gem) and are part of a tradition.
tiltbillings wrote:I'd have my own prvt retreat and let him run the schedule.
tiltbillings wrote:Unquestionably, but I wonder if they need to suffer under conformity to the symbolic significance, which seems to be what this thread is really about.Mr Man wrote:
I don't know if they have to be dour but they do have great symbolic significance (a manifestation of the tripple gem) and are part of a tradition.
Mr Man wrote:If I were to put a positive spin on it I would say that it meant more as a wake up call and to make it clear that more support is needed and this is how far the Ven. Ajahn will go rather than a serious new development in fund raising techniques.
NP20: Should any bhikkhu engage in various types of trade, it (the article obtained) is to be forfeited and confessed.
Probably not totally baseless or totally ignorant, bhante, but I am certainly finding the intensity of the negative response to Ven Brahm's curious choice interesting and bit unfortunate. As i have said, those of you who are finding Ven B's action a scandal, you should get together and send him a detailed objection to his "selling" of himself. No doubt his response would be of no small intertest to many of us on either side or no side of this tea-pottish storm.Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:
The baseless accusations of dour-faced Buddhists disapproving of the Venerable Brahmavamso's silliness just shows that some are totally ignorant of the Vinaya and the Buddhist tradition.
Those Mahayanists. Not dour.Dan74 wrote:Some may be interested in our sister site Dharma Wheel's response to the same news:
http://dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=12060&sid=c0b8fee8bf2fd9567b1190ad601c31a4
tiltbillings wrote:Those Mahayanists. Not dour.
Return to General Theravāda discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests