I have always been disappointed with all the sanghas that I have found so far (in Spain, France, and Thailand).
The reasons are multiple, like weird teachings, rituals, attachments to power and money, private jets…
Now I can understand why Ajahn Mun left everything behind and went to dwell alone in the forest!
I can not take refugee in something that I do not trust. I do not see the means of repeating “Sangham saranam gacchami”.
Can we do as the Dhammapada says?: “Be islands unto yourselves, be your own refuge, having no other; let the Dhamma be an island and a refuge to you, having no other.” ?
Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
- suriyopama
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:44 am
- Location: Thailand
Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Last edited by suriyopama on Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
I am sorry you feel that way, Suriyopama.
Still, giving dana to monks is a very meritorious act.
with metta,
Ben
Still, giving dana to monks is a very meritorious act.
with metta,
Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725
Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global Relief • UNHCR
e: [email protected]..
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725
Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global Relief • UNHCR
e: [email protected]..
- suriyopama
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:44 am
- Location: Thailand
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Thank you Ben.
I wish that someday I can find a suitable Sangha, because I do not always have enough energy to practice by myself. I fall very easily into sloth and torpor.
I still offer food to the monks in the morning, but now I am reluctant about putting my money onto that big boxes at the Wat anymore.
I wish that someday I can find a suitable Sangha, because I do not always have enough energy to practice by myself. I fall very easily into sloth and torpor.
I still offer food to the monks in the morning, but now I am reluctant about putting my money onto that big boxes at the Wat anymore.
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
suriyopama wrote:I have always been disappointed with all the sanghas that I have found so far (in Spain, France, and Thailand).
The reasons are multiple, like weird teachings, rituals, attachments to power and money, private jets…
Now I can understand why Ajahn Mun left everything behind and went to dwell alone in the forest!
I can not take refugee in something that I do not trust. I do not see the means of repeating “Sangham saranam gacchami”.
Can we do as the Dhammapada says?: “Be islands unto yourselves, be your own refuge, having no other; let the Dhamma be an island and a refuge to you, having no other.” ?
Hi suriyopama,
I'm so sorry to read about your difficulties. I definately haven't experienced anything like that on my visits to Amaravati Theravada Thai Forest Tradition monastery in the UK. (The previous abbot there was Ajahn Sumedho and the present one is Ajahn Amaro.)
I hope that you will eventually find somewhere like that in your travels. Don't give up hope!
With metta,
Aloka
- Bhikkhu Pesala
- Posts: 4644
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Please read the Ledi Sayādaw's Manual of the Dhamma carefully. It may help you to resolve some of your conflicts.
It may be hard to find good monks in Bangkok, but I am sure there are some if you know where to look. If not, then head out to the forest monasteries.
Wat Tamao, in Lampang, was also a very well run Pariyatti monastery when I was there many years ago.
It may be hard to find good monks in Bangkok, but I am sure there are some if you know where to look. If not, then head out to the forest monasteries.
Wat Tamao, in Lampang, was also a very well run Pariyatti monastery when I was there many years ago.
Blog • Pāli Fonts • In This Very Life • Buddhist Chronicles • Software (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Which Sangha have you found in Spain?suriyopama wrote:I have always been disappointed with all the sanghas that I have found so far (in Spain, France, and Thailand).
The reasons are multiple, like weird teachings, rituals, attachments to power and money, private jets…
Now I can understand why Ajahn Mun left everything behind and went to dwell alone in the forest!
I can not take refugee in something that I do not trust. I do not see the means of repeating “Sangham saranam gacchami”.
Can we do as the Dhammapada says?: “Be islands unto yourselves, be your own refuge, having no other; let the Dhamma be an island and a refuge to you, having no other.” ?
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Sangha has two meanings. It can be what we ordinarily understand as a Sangha: The group of ordinated monks (or nuns). But it can also mean the Ariya-Sangha, that is arahants, non-returners, once-returners and stream-enterers. And when you take refuge in the Sangha, it is the Ariya-Sangha you take refuge in.suriyopama wrote:I have always been disappointed with all the sanghas that I have found so far (in Spain, France, and Thailand).
The reasons are multiple, like weird teachings, rituals, attachments to power and money, private jets…
Now I can understand why Ajahn Mun left everything behind and went to dwell alone in the forest!
I can not take refugee in something that I do not trust. I do not see the means of repeating “Sangham saranam gacchami”.
Can we do as the Dhammapada says?: “Be islands unto yourselves, be your own refuge, having no other; let the Dhamma be an island and a refuge to you, having no other.” ?
This means that the Sangha you take refuge in, is the idealized group of Ariya-Sangha, not the physical group of people in yellow robes that you may see around you. So when you see some substandard monks, just ignore them. Forget the monks that do not keep up the noble standards. They are not the Sangha you are taking refuge in. Instead, think of the noble arahants etc., wherever they may be, and take refuge in them. And if they are not close at hand, follow the Dhammapada verse you quoted above.
Mettāya,
Kåre
Kåre
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
I have sometimes felt similarly myself but then I try to see if a Sangha or teacher have something valuable to share rather than wondering if I agree or approve of everything they do. If I am able to learn from them and progress in my practice, then it is a good Sangha, I think.suriyopama wrote:I have always been disappointed with all the sanghas that I have found so far (in Spain, France, and Thailand).
The reasons are multiple, like weird teachings, rituals, attachments to power and money, private jets…
Now I can understand why Ajahn Mun left everything behind and went to dwell alone in the forest!
I can not take refugee in something that I do not trust. I do not see the means of repeating “Sangham saranam gacchami”.
Can we do as the Dhammapada says?: “Be islands unto yourselves, be your own refuge, having no other; let the Dhamma be an island and a refuge to you, having no other.” ?
_/|\_
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Kare wrote: This means that the Sangha you take refuge in, is the idealized group of Ariya-Sangha, not the physical group of people in yellow robes that you may see around you. So when you see some substandard monks, just ignore them. Forget the monks that do not keep up the noble standards. They are not the Sangha you are taking refuge in. Instead, think of the noble arahants etc., wherever they may be, and take refuge in them. And if they are not close at hand, follow the Dhammapada verse you quoted above.
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
My personal opinion regarding giving to "bad" monks: If you give, you lose nothing if the monk decides to inappropriately use his requisites. That is his choice, and not something you have a say in. I don't think you are supporting their immorality. You, however, only gain from the action of giving, which is wholesome. Unless you have another choice, perhaps focus on the wholesome act not on what is done with your gift?
"If beings knew, as I know, the results of giving & sharing, they would not eat without having given, nor would the stain of miserliness overcome their minds. Even if it were their last bite, their last mouthful, they would not eat without having shared."
Iti 26
Iti 26
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Funny isn't it, I was just reading a sutta passage tonight that I think is relevant.
"In future times, Ananda, there will be members of the clan who are 'yellow necks', immoral, of evil character. People will give gifts to those immoral persons for the sake of the Sangha. Even then, I say, an offering made to the Sangha is incalculable, immeasurable. And I say that in no way is a gift to a person individually ever more fruitfal than an offering made to the Sangha." - MN 142.
In other respects, I think it pays to keep some context to things, yes there is a lot of corruption in the Sangha, and yes it's important that we recognise it and bring attention to such matters. But let's not forget the countless thousands of ardent yogis still practicing meditation all those good monks still out there who are keeping good vinaya, all those good laypeople still keeping the precepts, those of us who are still intent on Nibbana. There are still plenty of good people on this Earth, and while that holds true, don't spend too much time focusing on those who aren't. Let be what will be and use your abilities to change what is within your reach
metta
Jack
"In future times, Ananda, there will be members of the clan who are 'yellow necks', immoral, of evil character. People will give gifts to those immoral persons for the sake of the Sangha. Even then, I say, an offering made to the Sangha is incalculable, immeasurable. And I say that in no way is a gift to a person individually ever more fruitfal than an offering made to the Sangha." - MN 142.
In other respects, I think it pays to keep some context to things, yes there is a lot of corruption in the Sangha, and yes it's important that we recognise it and bring attention to such matters. But let's not forget the countless thousands of ardent yogis still practicing meditation all those good monks still out there who are keeping good vinaya, all those good laypeople still keeping the precepts, those of us who are still intent on Nibbana. There are still plenty of good people on this Earth, and while that holds true, don't spend too much time focusing on those who aren't. Let be what will be and use your abilities to change what is within your reach
metta
Jack
Last edited by BlackBird on Tue Jul 02, 2013 1:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher's message & lives to penetrate it, what accords with the Dhamma is this:
'The Blessed One is the Teacher, I am a disciple. He is the one who knows, not I." - MN. 70 Kitagiri Sutta
Path Press - Ñāṇavīra Thera Dhamma Page - Ajahn Nyanamoli's Dhamma talks
'The Blessed One is the Teacher, I am a disciple. He is the one who knows, not I." - MN. 70 Kitagiri Sutta
Path Press - Ñāṇavīra Thera Dhamma Page - Ajahn Nyanamoli's Dhamma talks
- lyndon taylor
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
- Location: Redlands, US occupied Northern Mexico
- Contact:
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Do we really think the corruption among ordained monks and nuns is greater than corruption among lay followers?? Just asking??
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community, sincerely former monk John
http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/
http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
In my experience and insight, one can apply the above only if one already has considerable faith and investment in Buddhism. Without sufficient faith and investment, one might not have the discernment that is necessary to apply the above instruction.Kare wrote:Sangha has two meanings. It can be what we ordinarily understand as a Sangha: The group of ordinated monks (or nuns). But it can also mean the Ariya-Sangha, that is arahants, non-returners, once-returners and stream-enterers. And when you take refuge in the Sangha, it is the Ariya-Sangha you take refuge in.
This means that the Sangha you take refuge in, is the idealized group of Ariya-Sangha, not the physical group of people in yellow robes that you may see around you. So when you see some substandard monks, just ignore them. Forget the monks that do not keep up the noble standards. They are not the Sangha you are taking refuge in. Instead, think of the noble arahants etc., wherever they may be, and take refuge in them. And if they are not close at hand, follow the Dhammapada verse you quoted above.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
- purple planet
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:07 am
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
I think a good solution to this is : donate food to monks donate money to a charity organization
- suriyopama
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:44 am
- Location: Thailand
Re: Disappointment with sanghas. No refugee
Thank you very much for all your kind responses.
kare wrote:Sangha has two meanings. It can be what we ordinarily understand as a Sangha: The group of ordinated monks (or nuns). But it can also mean the Ariya-Sangha, that is arahants, non-returners, once-returners and stream-enterers. And when you take refuge in the Sangha, it is the Ariya-Sangha you take refuge in.
This means that the Sangha you take refuge in, is the idealized group of Ariya-Sangha, not the physical group of people in yellow robes that you may see around you. So when you see some substandard monks, just ignore them. Forget the monks that do not keep up the noble standards. They are not the Sangha you are taking refuge in. Instead, think of the noble arahants etc., wherever they may be, and take refuge in them. And if they are not close at hand, follow the Dhammapada verse you quoted above.
That one was not Theravada. Tibetan “weekend” monks that have a mundane Lay Life and business, and only dress the robes when they go to the temple during the weekend. Anyway, there is also a Theravada Association in Spain that requires to pay a compulsory fee in order to be a member.nekete wrote:Which Sangha have you found in Spain?