Should Wives Be Obedient?

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Holdan
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:29 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Holdan » Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:57 pm

wormhole wrote:Like Buddha said several times, should we still uphold things like this:

http://www.palikanon.com/english/pali_n ... gaha_s.htm


From Sigalovada Sutta

In five ways, young householder, should a wife as the West be ministered to by a husband:

(iv) by handing over authority to her


:bow:

User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 3838
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Aloka » Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:17 pm

lyndon taylor wrote:I wouldn't be so sure women in the Buddha's time were at home taking care of the house, they were probably out in the fields taking care of the crops too, as well as buying and selling in the market.

According to some Tibetan commentators, the mens job was to sit around looking pretty while women did almost all the work, that's what is know as a matriachal society!!! I don't think Indian culture was matriarchal, but I would be surprised if womens responsibilities didn't extend well outside house keeping.........


Tibetan commentators talking about what ? Ancient Indian society or Tibetan society ? In Tibet they practised polygamy and women didn't have just one husband but had to accept his brothers as well.

.

wormhole
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:45 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby wormhole » Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:30 pm

BlackBird wrote:I think the internet has become a little bit overly-suspicious when it comes to the motives of posters. I suppose it's the boy-who-cried-wolf effect. But I for one tend to take people at face value. What's the motive in coming to some obscure Buddhist forum simply to sow discord? The OP wants an obedient wife and Aloof think's he's a "Buddha-son" and has mastered the Dhamma of the Mahayana. No ulterior motives from where I stand.

But I have to say Aloof, your cosmic deepities are not my cup of tea :P


You clearly did not read my other posts. Just the idea have having an obedient wife is bleh to me.

User avatar
lyndon taylor
Posts: 968
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: Redlands, Southern California, USA
Contact:

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby lyndon taylor » Thu Jul 18, 2013 11:16 pm

Aloka wrote:
lyndon taylor wrote:I wouldn't be so sure women in the Buddha's time were at home taking care of the house, they were probably out in the fields taking care of the crops too, as well as buying and selling in the market.

According to some Tibetan commentators, the mens job was to sit around looking pretty while women did almost all the work, that's what is know as a matriachal society!!! I don't think Indian culture was matriarchal, but I would be surprised if womens responsibilities didn't extend well outside house keeping.........


Tibetan commentators talking about what ? Ancient Indian society or Tibetan society ? In Tibet they practised polygamy and women didn't have just one husband but had to accept his brothers as well.

.


Tibetan commentators talking about matriarchal society in Tibet, sorry I didn't make that clear. Tibetans practised both polyandry and polygamy, polyandry was usually an attempt to keep the family property intact under one family upon inheritance, whereas the nobles tended to have polygamy, multiple wives. I don't know what the situation in India would have been in the buddha's time.
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community that has so generously given me so much, sincerely former monk John

User avatar
BlackBird
Posts: 1861
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:07 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6
Location: New Zealand

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby BlackBird » Thu Jul 18, 2013 11:31 pm

wormhole wrote:
BlackBird wrote:I think the internet has become a little bit overly-suspicious when it comes to the motives of posters. I suppose it's the boy-who-cried-wolf effect. But I for one tend to take people at face value. What's the motive in coming to some obscure Buddhist forum simply to sow discord? The OP wants an obedient wife and Aloof think's he's a "Buddha-son" and has mastered the Dhamma of the Mahayana. No ulterior motives from where I stand.

But I have to say Aloof, your cosmic deepities are not my cup of tea :P


You clearly did not read my other posts. Just the idea have having an obedient wife is bleh to me.


I did read your posts, and I'm sorry If I misinterpreted what you were saying, it was not clear to me.
"For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher's message & lives to penetrate it, what accords with the Dhamma is this:
'The Blessed One is the Teacher, I am a disciple. He is the one who knows, not I." - MN. 70 Kitagiri Sutta

wormhole
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:45 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby wormhole » Thu Jul 18, 2013 11:49 pm

BlackBird wrote:
wormhole wrote:
BlackBird wrote:I think the internet has become a little bit overly-suspicious when it comes to the motives of posters. I suppose it's the boy-who-cried-wolf effect. But I for one tend to take people at face value. What's the motive in coming to some obscure Buddhist forum simply to sow discord? The OP wants an obedient wife and Aloof think's he's a "Buddha-son" and has mastered the Dhamma of the Mahayana. No ulterior motives from where I stand.

But I have to say Aloof, your cosmic deepities are not my cup of tea :P


You clearly did not read my other posts. Just the idea have having an obedient wife is bleh to me.


I did read your posts, and I'm sorry If I misinterpreted what you were saying, it was not clear to me.


I was referring to this post:

"Personally, I find the Buddha's teachings wise-guidelines that can still help us today, but me must tailor them to our own individual and personally I could never have a subservient wife; just wouldn't give me the same happiness of having a COMPLETELY equal relationship. The purpose of this thread was to see if others thought a subservient wife role was still good for some women, which I've always gone back and forth on in opinion in regards to that".

User avatar
BlackBird
Posts: 1861
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:07 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6
Location: New Zealand

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby BlackBird » Thu Jul 18, 2013 11:56 pm

I'm sorry, I missed that one. You have my apologies and I would ask your forgiveness.
"For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher's message & lives to penetrate it, what accords with the Dhamma is this:
'The Blessed One is the Teacher, I am a disciple. He is the one who knows, not I." - MN. 70 Kitagiri Sutta

User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 494
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Kusala » Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:24 am

wormhole wrote:Like Buddha said several times, should we still uphold things like this:

http://www.palikanon.com/english/pali_n ... gaha_s.htm


Context is everything...
Image

Homage to the Buddha
Thus indeed, is that Blessed One: He is the Holy One, fully enlightened, endowed with clear vision and virtuous conduct, sublime, the Knower of the worlds, the incomparable leader of men to be tamed, the teacher of gods and men, enlightened and blessed.

Homage to the Teachings
The Dhamma of the Blessed One is perfectly expounded; to be seen here and now; not delayed in
time; inviting one to come and see; onward leading (to Nibbana); to be known by the wise, each for himself.

wormhole
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:45 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby wormhole » Fri Jul 19, 2013 1:54 am

BlackBird wrote:I'm sorry, I missed that one. You have my apologies and I would ask your forgiveness.

No worries.

User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 3838
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Aloka » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:42 am

lyndon taylor wrote:
Aloka wrote:
lyndon taylor wrote:I wouldn't be so sure women in the Buddha's time were at home taking care of the house, they were probably out in the fields taking care of the crops too, as well as buying and selling in the market.

According to some Tibetan commentators, the mens job was to sit around looking pretty while women did almost all the work, that's what is know as a matriachal society!!! I don't think Indian culture was matriarchal, but I would be surprised if womens responsibilities didn't extend well outside house keeping.........


Tibetan commentators talking about what ? Ancient Indian society or Tibetan society ? In Tibet they practised polygamy and women didn't have just one husband but had to accept his brothers as well.

.


Tibetan commentators talking about matriarchal society in Tibet, sorry I didn't make that clear. Tibetans practised both polyandry and polygamy, polyandry was usually an attempt to keep the family property intact under one family upon inheritance, whereas the nobles tended to have polygamy, multiple wives. I don't know what the situation in India would have been in the buddha's time.



When I was involved with Tibetan Buddhism,I only heard about women having more than one husband at a time, usually related, which seems like bondage to me, as I am a woman myself and wouldn't like the idea of having to be passed around brothers!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyandry_in_Tibet

I don't think in general terms it could genuinely be described as a matriarchal society either, because it was dominated by religion and the influence of the male tulkus and their monasteries.

:)

User avatar
lyndon taylor
Posts: 968
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: Redlands, Southern California, USA
Contact:

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby lyndon taylor » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:52 am

Having read many, many books on Tibet and Tibetan buddhism, I can assure you that both polyandry and polygamy was practised in Tibet, polyandry more by the poor, and polygamy more by the rich, and that many commentators viewed tibetan society at least in part to be matriarchal. in that the women were in charge of the homes, businesses and farms and made most of the decisions as well as doing much of the work, largely in part because a huge percent of the men were away in the monasteries. One of the last true matriarchal cultures still exists on the borders of Tibet, the Mosuo people.

heres a reference to multiple wives among the nobility, admittadly appears to be a chinese source, but accurate in this respect; http://www.kalachakra.org/articles/marriage.shtml
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community that has so generously given me so much, sincerely former monk John

User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 3838
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Aloka » Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:36 am

Having read many, many books on Tibet and Tibetan buddhism,....


Sure, that's great that you've read many many books and the internet,- but I was talking about conversations I had with real Tibetans during the years I practised TB away from books and the internet.

However I don't have anything further to say, so have a nice day!


:anjali:

User avatar
lyndon taylor
Posts: 968
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: Redlands, Southern California, USA
Contact:

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby lyndon taylor » Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:41 am

Most Tibetans you meet in the West were raised in India, I'm talking about books written by the first western explorers to Tibet up to 100 years ago, a lot has changed since then.......
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community that has so generously given me so much, sincerely former monk John

GusVanSpent
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:46 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby GusVanSpent » Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:20 am

These kinds of questions have always confused me.

The Buddha reached enlightenment, therefore he was all knowing, past present and future.

At the time women's rights were not as well established as they are today, women were treated more as servants than equal partners.

The Buddha was of this time, therefore he saw a martial situation that would have the husband at the head of the family, the wife as the caregiver, cook, cleaner etc but that she should be respected as a human being with compassion.

So if the Buddha was all knowing, past, present and future. If he believed women should serve men, this would be a timeless universal rule as he knew right and wrong for past, present and future generations.

If we question the Buddha's teachings, don't we question enlightenment as well?

User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
Posts: 14815
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby retrofuturist » Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:22 am

Greetings,

GusVanSpent wrote:The Buddha reached enlightenment, therefore he was all knowing, past present and future.

No, that's not what enlightenment is.

Metta,
Retro. :)
If you have asked me of the origination of unease, then I shall explain it to you in accordance with my understanding:
Whatever various forms of unease there are in the world, They originate founded in encumbering accumulation. (Pārāyanavagga)


Exalted in mind, just open and clearly aware, the recluse trained in the ways of the sages:
One who is such, calmed and ever mindful, He has no sorrows! -- Udana IV, 7


Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum) -- Open flower ~ Open book (blog)

dagon
Posts: 297
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 12:45 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby dagon » Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:39 am

wormhole wrote:Like Buddha said several times, should we still uphold things like this:

http://www.palikanon.com/english/pali_n ... gaha_s.htm


In the link I fail to see where it said that my wife should obey me – I see where it said “she should respect his wishes”. I live in the present (aka 2013) and my wishes are that we should have a relationship of equals: based on honesty, trust, mutual respect, fidelity and the dhamma. She lives up to all of my wishes. :twothumbsup:

metta
paul

User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 3229
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Kim OHara » Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:51 am

dagon wrote:
wormhole wrote:Like Buddha said several times, should we still uphold things like this:

http://www.palikanon.com/english/pali_n ... gaha_s.htm


In the link I fail to see where it said that my wife should obey me – I see where it said “she should respect his wishes”. I live in the present (aka 2013) and my wishes are that we should have a relationship of equals: based on honesty, trust, mutual respect, fidelity and the dhamma. She lives up to all of my wishes. :twothumbsup:

metta
paul

:goodpost:

:namaste:
Kim

User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 3229
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Kim OHara » Tue Aug 20, 2013 5:24 am

One footnote to the thread, just because it turned up in my email today:

Today's Short Reading from the Bible... from Genesis:
"And God promised men that good and obedient wives would be found in all corners of the earth".
Then he made the earth round... and he laughed and laughed and laughed!


:smile:
Kim

Jhana4
Posts: 1309
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 5:20 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: U.S.A., Northeast

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Jhana4 » Tue Aug 20, 2013 11:32 am

The real question underlying this thread is

"What do we do when we come across a piece of a religion, in a religion we like that is way out of date with modern values we also like?"
Last edited by Jhana4 on Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In reading the scriptures, there are two kinds of mistakes:
One mistake is to cling to the literal text and miss the inner principles.
The second mistake is to recognize the principles but not apply them to your own mind, so that you waste time and just make them into causes of entanglement.

User avatar
Modus.Ponens
Posts: 2153
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:38 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1
Location: Gallifrey

Re: Should Wives Be Obedient?

Postby Modus.Ponens » Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:31 pm

In substance, yes. But the key motivation is: how can I best troll a bunch of buddhists?

This guy joined on 12th July and last visited on 19th July, making 18 posts, 17 of which were on this thread.

So there isn't much value in continuing to discuss the substance in this context, imo.
He turns his mind away from those phenomena, and having done so, inclines his mind to the property of deathlessness: 'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.'
(Jhana Sutta - Thanissaro Bhikkhu translation)


Return to “General Theravāda discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests