"One should not consume elephant flesh... horse flesh... dog flesh... snake flesh... lion flesh... tiger flesh... leopard flesh... bear flesh... hyena flesh. Whoever should do so: an offense of wrong doing." — Mv.VI.23.10-15
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... .ch04.html
I am curious if anyone here knows why the Buddha forbade monks and nuns from eating these types of meat? I mean, I can imagine a number of reasons, but did Buddha or any of his disciples ever state clear reasons for this?
Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17230
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
I have read or heard two reasons:
1. These are the flesh of predators and the smell of their flesh would attract other predators to the bhikkhu.
2. They are considered "royal" / higher animals by custom and to adapt to the culture, the bhikkhu should not eat their flesh, even if it is offered.
1. These are the flesh of predators and the smell of their flesh would attract other predators to the bhikkhu.
2. They are considered "royal" / higher animals by custom and to adapt to the culture, the bhikkhu should not eat their flesh, even if it is offered.
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
Weren't cows also "holy" and "royal" animals in ancient India? And if so, why didn't the Buddha forbid people from eating the meat of cows, as well?David N. Snyder wrote:I have read or heard two reasons:
2. They are considered "royal" / higher animals by custom and to adapt to the culture, the bhikkhu should not eat their flesh, even if it is offered.
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17230
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
Cows were venerated in the Vedas, this is true. However, I think cows may have elevated to the much higher status at a later date. The brahmanism 'religion' (not Hinduism, but perhaps a precursor) engaged in animal sacrifices, which included cows and bulls.Luke wrote: Weren't cows also "holy" and "royal" animals in ancient India? And if so, why didn't the Buddha forbid people from eating the meat of cows, as well?
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
Ah, very interesting! Were any animals sacred to ancient Hindus or were they willing to sacrifice all animals?David N. Snyder wrote: Cows were venerated in the Vedas, this is true. However, I think cows may have elevated to the much higher status at a later date. The brahmanism 'religion' (not Hinduism, but perhaps a precursor) engaged in animal sacrifices, which included cows and bulls.
- lyndon taylor
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
- Location: Redlands, US occupied Northern Mexico
- Contact:
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
Well just a crazy idea her but almost all of these animals that were forbidden are animals that can kill, maim or even eat you, whereas almost all the anmals you can eat, except for fish are docile vegetarians, kind of like most meat eating today.
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community, sincerely former monk John
http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/
http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17230
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
Mostly goats and bulls; pigs very rarely. Pigs have been rarely used in animal sacrifices, not because they were considered "holy" but probably more likely because they were considered dirty.Luke wrote:Ah, very interesting! Were any animals sacred to ancient Hindus or were they willing to sacrifice all animals?David N. Snyder wrote: Cows were venerated in the Vedas, this is true. However, I think cows may have elevated to the much higher status at a later date. The brahmanism 'religion' (not Hinduism, but perhaps a precursor) engaged in animal sacrifices, which included cows and bulls.
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
Hi all
One of these days I will get around to the multi quote skill – please bear with me.
"One should not consume elephant flesh... horse flesh... dog flesh... snake flesh... lion flesh... tiger flesh... leopard flesh... bear flesh... hyena flesh. Whoever should do so: an offense of wrong doing." — Mv.VI.23.10-15
The commonality of all of these animals is an association with killing, remember that elephants and horses were also used in warfare. At the time of Buddha there were concepts of transferred karma this continues to this day in certain Hindu sects. The other thing that is worth considering is the potential for “meat” to be tainted by human blood which would effective result in the consumption of part of a human body.
In Hindu beliefs cows were, and are considered to one of your mother, milk and other reasons.
The omission of cows from the list I belie to be telling, while in warfare cattle could be used to pull carts and such tasks, Kshatriyas (soldiers and nobles) did not directly fight from them. This was the caste that Buddha was born into and even without his all seeing eye he would have understood.
Metta
paul
One of these days I will get around to the multi quote skill – please bear with me.
"One should not consume elephant flesh... horse flesh... dog flesh... snake flesh... lion flesh... tiger flesh... leopard flesh... bear flesh... hyena flesh. Whoever should do so: an offense of wrong doing." — Mv.VI.23.10-15
The commonality of all of these animals is an association with killing, remember that elephants and horses were also used in warfare. At the time of Buddha there were concepts of transferred karma this continues to this day in certain Hindu sects. The other thing that is worth considering is the potential for “meat” to be tainted by human blood which would effective result in the consumption of part of a human body.
In Hindu beliefs cows were, and are considered to one of your mother, milk and other reasons.
The omission of cows from the list I belie to be telling, while in warfare cattle could be used to pull carts and such tasks, Kshatriyas (soldiers and nobles) did not directly fight from them. This was the caste that Buddha was born into and even without his all seeing eye he would have understood.
Metta
paul
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
I think the Buddha disallowed any food that the culture of the times considered to be repulsive to eat.....the monks were after all representatives of the dhamma so the Buddha did not want them to do things considered to be repulsive by the people of the time. People were likely to not want to take refuge in a group of people who ate hyenas, snakes, and elephants for example. My view is that the posters here have given some of the reasons why certain meats were considered repulsive.
chownah
chownah
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
That sounds plausible that Buddha was concerned with the image which his monks projected. I'm sure that Buddha did not want his followers doing disgusting things like the aghoris did.chownah wrote:I think the Buddha disallowed any food that the culture of the times considered to be repulsive to eat.....the monks were after all representatives of the dhamma so the Buddha did not want them to do things considered to be repulsive by the people of the time. People were likely to not want to take refuge in a group of people who ate hyenas, snakes, and elephants for example. My view is that the posters here have given some of the reasons why certain meats were considered repulsive.
chownah
- Bhikkhu Pesala
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
It's is mostly about what people disapproved of, but also about the danger of being attacked by wild animals.
Ten Kinds of Meat
Cow Dhamma
It's not prohibited by the Vinaya rule, as long as it is free from the three defects, but the Suttanta clearly show the debt of gratitude owed to cows who provide milk, and labour to till the land, thresh the crop, and transport the crop to market. When the Sayādaw was teaching (and in the Buddha's time of course), there were no diesel tractors or petrol vehicles. All the hard work was done by domestic draught animals.
Ten Kinds of Meat
- Human flesh (not helpful for arousing faith in those who have no faith)
- Elephant flesh (a symbol of royalty, and the king might disapprove)
- Horse flesh (a symbol of royalty, and the king might disapprove)
- Dog's flesh (disgusting)
- Snake flesh (disgusting, and some nāgas might harm the monks)
- Lion's flesh (danger from lions)
- Tiger's flesh (danger from tigers)
- Panther/leopard's flesh (danger from panthers)
- Bear's flesh (danger from bears)
- Hyena's flesh (danger from hyenas).
Cow Dhamma
It's not prohibited by the Vinaya rule, as long as it is free from the three defects, but the Suttanta clearly show the debt of gratitude owed to cows who provide milk, and labour to till the land, thresh the crop, and transport the crop to market. When the Sayādaw was teaching (and in the Buddha's time of course), there were no diesel tractors or petrol vehicles. All the hard work was done by domestic draught animals.
Blog • Pāli Fonts • In This Very Life • Buddhist Chronicles • Software (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
Re: Why did Buddha forbid certain types of meat?
But it seems that honoring cows by not eating beef is just largely symbolic, since it seems that cows in the Indian dairy industry are slaughtered or exiled to the streets to die according to this article. So monks who still drink milk are really not honoring cows that much. Although perhaps milk cows are treated better in small villages in India.Bhikkhu Pesala wrote: In Burma, Beef is also not often eaten by monks, largely due to the influence of Venerable Ledi Sayādaw.
Cow Dhamma
It's not prohibited by the Vinaya rule, as long as it is free from the three defects, but the Suttanta clearly show the debt of gratitude owed to cows who provide milk, and labour to till the land, thresh the crop, and transport the crop to market. When the Sayādaw was teaching (and in the Buddha's time of course), there were no diesel tractors or petrol vehicles. All the hard work was done by domestic draught animals.
http://www.thehindu.com/features/magazi ... 675921.ece
It's ironic that a country which obsesses over cows doesn't have a milk industry which treats cows well.