karma question

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths - what can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
jakartaguytebet
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:24 am

karma question

Post by jakartaguytebet »

I have some questions about karma. Its intriguing how Buddha never purported to know about heaven, gods, etc and yet talked of karma, past lives, and so on. Is this a contradiction?

And once we snuff out the flame and our mind becomes still, we are free from the cycle of rebirth. But doesn't this spell death? Wouldn't it be better to be reborn, albeit into suffering, but at least we would be alive. Nirvana seems to be an emptiness, a cessation of life.

I am obviously missing something.

Or is my concept of karma wrong: perhaps the release from karma can be interpreted as the release from impermanence in thought alone. We have only one life and nirvana is simply a higher realm of existence.

Thank you for your comments.
User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 7797
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: karma question

Post by Aloka »

Hi,

You might find this talk about karma helpful. Its called "Who is pulling the strings" and is by Ajahn Amaro, abbot of Amaravati monastery. There's also a question and anwer session at the link, which you can listen to after the talk.

http://www.amaravati.org/teachings/audi ... ation/2083

With kind wishes,

Aloka
jakartaguytebet
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:24 am

Re: karma question

Post by jakartaguytebet »

Aloka wrote:Hi,

You might find this talk about karma helpful. Its called "Who is pulling the strings" and is by Ajahn Amaro, abbot of Amaravati monastery. There's also a question and anwer session at the link, which you can listen to after the talk.

http://www.amaravati.org/teachings/audi ... ation/2083

With kind wishes,

Aloka
Thanks buddy:)
dxm_dxm
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:32 am
Location: Romania, Bucharest
Contact:

Re: karma question

Post by dxm_dxm »

"Non-existence scares the children and brings peace to the wise"

Think of the implications of existing: you will exist in innumerable posibilities, good and bad, very good and very bad, very very good and very very bad

Also, you should not try to imagine non existence, nirvana. You will not exist separate from the whole world, you will be in everything and nowhere, something like that. This concept is imposible to describe in words or imagine, budha said that nirvana is like the smell of a rose, it is imposible to describe in words the smell of a rose.
jakartaguytebet
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:24 am

Re: karma question

Post by jakartaguytebet »

dxm_dxm wrote:"Non-existence scares the children and brings peace to the wise"

Think of the implications of existing: you will exist in innumerable posibilities, good and bad, very good and very bad, very very good and very very bad

Also, you should not try to imagine non existence, nirvana. You will not exist separate from the whole world, you will be in everything and nowhere, something like that. This concept is imposible to describe in words or imagine, budha said that nirvana is like the smell of a rose, it is imposible to describe in words the smell of a rose.
Thank you for your reply, dxm. Very interesting. But I am not sure if nirvana is equivalent to non existence. I believe nirvana is cessation of many things, but not of existence itself.

Another thing I was wondering about was the concept of karma and good deeds. We must always try to do good deeds, but many good deeds lead to bad deeds do they not? I give a beggar money and he uses it to buy a gun and kill someone. Am I not complicit?

It seems to me that even a buddha would fall into this karmic sin. But how is that possible?
User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 7797
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: karma question

Post by Aloka »

jakartaguytebet wrote:
Another thing I was wondering about was the concept of karma and good deeds. We must always try to do good deeds, but many good deeds lead to bad deeds do they not? I give a beggar money and he uses it to buy a gun and kill someone. Am I not complicit?

It seems to me that even a buddha would fall into this karmic sin. But how is that possible?
The Buddha said that kamma is intention.
"Intention, I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
So therefore if you give a beggar money to buy food and then he buys a gun, that wasn't your intention, so you are not responsible for him killing someone.

Regarding the results of kamma, its also worth knowing that the Buddha said that the precise results of kamma are unconjecturable:

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html


:anjali:
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4646
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: karma question

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

jakartaguytebet wrote:I have some questions about karma. Its intriguing how Buddha never purported to know about heaven, gods, etc and yet talked of karma, past lives, and so on. Is this a contradiction?
I don't know where you heard this. The Buddha was the teacher of gods and men, he regularly gave teachings to celestial beings, either when they visited him, or when he visited them.

I recommend some background reading to learn the basics so that your questions here will be more fruitful.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
jakartaguytebet
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:24 am

Re: karma question

Post by jakartaguytebet »

Aloka wrote:
jakartaguytebet wrote:
Another thing I was wondering about was the concept of karma and good deeds. We must always try to do good deeds, but many good deeds lead to bad deeds do they not? I give a beggar money and he uses it to buy a gun and kill someone. Am I not complicit?

It seems to me that even a buddha would fall into this karmic sin. But how is that possible?
The Buddha said that kamma is intention.
"Intention, I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
So therefore if you give a beggar money to buy food and then he buys a gun, that wasn't your intention, so you are not responsible for him killing someone.

Regarding the results of kamma, its also worth knowing that the Buddha said that the precise results of kamma are unconjecturable:

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html


:anjali:


Thank you, I see what you mean.

Karma is intention. It is a metaphysical 'event' and not a physical consequence.
jakartaguytebet
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:24 am

Re: karma question

Post by jakartaguytebet »

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:
jakartaguytebet wrote:I have some questions about karma. Its intriguing how Buddha never purported to know about heaven, gods, etc and yet talked of karma, past lives, and so on. Is this a contradiction?
I don't know where you heard this. The Buddha was the teacher of gods and men, he regularly gave teachings to celestial beings, either when they visited him, or when he visited them.

I recommend some background reading to learn the basics so that your questions here will be more fruitful.
It depends on one's school of buddhism my friend.

Metaphysical speculation of gods, other dimensions etc is unprovable and best to avoid.

'Suppose a man is struck by a poisoned arrow and the doctor wishes to take out the arrow immediately. Suppose the man does not want the arrow removed until he knows who shot it, his age, his parents, and why he shot it. What would happen? If he were to wait until all these questions have been answered, the man might die first." Life is so short. It must not be spent in endless metaphysical speculation that does not bring us any closer to the truth.'

Which is why the concept of karma is problematic once it is extended outside our lifetime. It has an element of supposition to it in this case.
User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: karma question

Post by Kusala »

jakartaguytebet wrote:
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:
jakartaguytebet wrote:I have some questions about karma. Its intriguing how Buddha never purported to know about heaven, gods, etc and yet talked of karma, past lives, and so on. Is this a contradiction?
I don't know where you heard this. The Buddha was the teacher of gods and men, he regularly gave teachings to celestial beings, either when they visited him, or when he visited them.

I recommend some background reading to learn the basics so that your questions here will be more fruitful.
It depends on one's school of buddhism my friend.

Metaphysical speculation of gods, other dimensions etc is unprovable and best to avoid.

'Suppose a man is struck by a poisoned arrow and the doctor wishes to take out the arrow immediately. Suppose the man does not want the arrow removed until he knows who shot it, his age, his parents, and why he shot it. What would happen? If he were to wait until all these questions have been answered, the man might die first." Life is so short. It must not be spent in endless metaphysical speculation that does not bring us any closer to the truth.'

Which is why the concept of karma is problematic once it is extended outside our lifetime. It has an element of supposition to it in this case.
True, but one day "string theory" might be able to explain some of the amazing insights the Buddha had...
"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "
jakartaguytebet
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:24 am

Re: karma question

Post by jakartaguytebet »

True, but one day "string theory" might be able to explain some of the amazing insights the Buddha had...[/quote]

Go on, you have my attention :D

Are you referring to other dimensions?
But the problem with string theory is that is not based on observation and cannot be tested. It may evolve into a religion.
But perhaps it can be proven mathematically; or if not proven shown to be viable.
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4646
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: karma question

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

jakartaguytebet wrote:Metaphysical speculation of gods, other dimensions etc is unprovable and best to avoid.
That has nothing to do with your initial post, which boldly stated:
the Buddha never taught about gods
By what means did you arrive at that conclusion if not by metaphysical speculation? I asked where you heard it. Maybe your source was also speculating that the Buddha never taught about gods?

He obviously did, and any statement to the contrary will have to dismiss most of his teachings, and I don't mean just the Commentaries.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
jakartaguytebet
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:24 am

Re: karma question

Post by jakartaguytebet »

Are you saying the buddha taught about gods? Or spoke about gods?
If so, you have taught me something new.
I thought he avoided such questions, as evidenced by the quote I cut and pastd for you.
Thx
User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 7797
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: karma question

Post by Aloka »

jakartaguytebet wrote:Are you saying the buddha taught about gods? Or spoke about gods?
If so, you have taught me something new.
I thought he avoided such questions, as evidenced by the quote I cut and pastd for you.
Could you give the source of your quote, please ?

Here is a reference about gods from MN 41
18. "If a householder who observes conduct in accordance with the Dhamma, righteous conduct, should wish: 'Oh, that on the dissolution of the body, after death, I might reappear in the company of the gods of the Four Kings!' it is possible that on the dissolution of the body, after death, he may do so. Why is that? Because he observes conduct in accordance with the Dhamma, righteous conduct.

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .nymo.html

:anjali:
anando
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:41 pm

Re: karma question

Post by anando »

Hello,
i´m quite experienced in buddhist teaching. What is bothering me is, that there are no quotes of Pali-Kanon. Pali-Kanon is not the problem, but where
to fin it. i´m in posession of a translation of an ancient Pali-Canon from Colombo. This is a translation into german. On the left side there are the
page numbers of the original ancient Pali-Kanon. I personally do prefer Dighanikayo becaus Gotamo Buddho is telling more about the things he didn´t
speak before.How much karma one is accumulating is depending on the amount of good and bad deeds. The accounting is done after death.
If one has not enough good deeds he will have to do more life circles to proceed.
Buddhist Karma is in no way throwing you back but to stay or you proceed further.
There are 32 physical signs on our body that tell how far your Karma is advanced.
You will ge a great amont of positive Karma doing the Eightfold Path.

anando
Post Reply