SDC wrote:When did I say should?
Lol ok I will rephrase
How is there "room for improvement"?
What do you mean by "room for improvement"?
Although if you see "room for improvement" then that seems to mean that you see something lacking, which seems to indicate that you see a deficiency. Therefore you see that an improvement should be made. Unless of course you wish to be deficient, or to adhere to a deficient doctrine.
However a question then follows, why would you adhere to that which Is deficient? Or, if you do not want that, not try to resolve the deficiency?
So I repeat, how is there room for improvement?