A forum for beginners and members of other Buddhist traditions to ask questions about Theravāda (The Way of the Elders). Responses require moderator approval before they are visible in order to double-check alignment to Theravāda orthodoxy.
I was reading about what an arahant is. From Dhp VII, Arahantavagga, The Arahant or Perfected One:
92. Those who do not accumulate and are wise regarding food, whose object is the Void, the Unconditioned Freedom — their track cannot be traced, like that of birds in the air.
What does this mean that their object is the void? Everything I've ever read about "voidness" or "the void" is that it's to be avoided. In fact in the tradition I come from, getting attached to the void or meditating improperly on emptiness can potentially lead to post-mortem-continuation in a formless realm.
However, it's not necessarily referring to the "formless jhanas" such as that in which the Buddha's meditation teachers dwelt in and experienced the fate you describe above.
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
However, it's not necessarily referring to the "formless jhanas" such as that in which the Buddha's meditation teachers dwelt in and experienced the fate you describe above.
Metta,
Retro.
Yes I see. In the book I'm reading the Buddha's teachers were described, and as I understand it he mastered what they (ascetics) had to offer and then moved on. So in the quote I referenced above, The Void really means realization of emptiness (as understood in the proper sense)?
I see it here as relating to a dynamic mode of perception, where there is knowledge/awareness that all that is being experienced is both anatta and anicca. There is no perception of, or clinging to, any form of 'self'.
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
I see it here as relating to a dynamic mode of perception, where there is knowledge/awareness that all that is being experienced is both anatta and anicca. There is no perception of, or clinging to, any form of 'self'.
Drolma wrote:What does this mean that their object is the void?
The Blessed One said to him: "Sariputta, your faculties are clear. The colour of your skin is pure and bright. What abiding do you often abide in now, Sariputta?"
And what is the deliverance of mind through voidness? There is the case where a monk, having gone into the wilderness, to the root of a tree or into an empty dwelling, considers thus: 'This is void of self or of anything belonging to self.' This is called the deliverance of mind through voidness.
I see it here as relating to a dynamic mode of perception, where there is knowledge/awareness that all that is being experienced is both anatta and anicca. There is no perception of, or clinging to, any form of 'self'.
Metta,
Retro.
Yes, so in this sense, the Arahant, through seeing the Void, sees things they are, and so when he sees something, he sees "this is not self" and "whatever would be the cause for agitation, that is not present here".
Drolma wrote:I was reading about what an arahant is. From Dhp VII, Arahantavagga, The Arahant or Perfected One:
92. Those who do not accumulate and are wise regarding food, whose object is the Void, the Unconditioned Freedom — their track cannot be traced, like that of birds in the air.
What does this mean that their object is the void? Everything I've ever read about "voidness" or "the void" is that it's to be avoided. In fact in the tradition I come from, getting attached to the void or meditating improperly on emptiness can potentially lead to post-mortem-continuation in a formless realm.