Oprah & Jack Kornfield

A place to discuss casual topics amongst spiritual friends.
Post Reply
User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 17194
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by DNS »

http://www.oprah.com/own-super-soul-sun ... ving-Video

(thanks to reddust at Dharma Wheel -- where I found this link)
SamKR
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:33 pm

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by SamKR »

Pleasant to hear. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 6594
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:55 pm
Location: USA

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by Mkoll »

Good. Any positive exposure of Buddhism of any stripe in the mainstream media is good.

:anjali:
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
SarathW
Posts: 21257
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by SarathW »

It is not easy to make a TV programmed which appeal to millions of non Buddhist.
I am not sure whether Buddha ever said that he is not a human!
I like the way he introduce Brahama Viharas without any technical jargons.
The last episode soul to soul is more of a Christian belief than a Buddhist belief.
For me one inch forward is a one inch forward.
So it is good episode to watch.
However it is no different to teaching meditation in fitness centers.
:shrug:
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by tiltbillings »

SarathW wrote: I am not sure whether Buddha ever said that he is not a human!
  • On one occasion the Blessed One was traveling along the road between Ukkattha and Setabya, and Dona the brahman was also traveling along the road between Ukkattha and Setabya. Dona the brahman saw, in the Blessed One's footprints, wheels with 1,000 spokes, together with rims and hubs, complete in all their features. On seeing them, the thought occurred to him, "How amazing! How astounding! These are not the footprints of a human being!"

    Then the Blessed One, leaving the road, went to sit at the root of a certain tree — his legs crossed, his body erect, with mindfulness established to the fore. Then Dona, following the Blessed One's footprints, saw him sitting at the root of the tree: confident, inspiring confidence, his senses calmed, his mind calmed, having attained the utmost control & tranquility, tamed, guarded, his senses restrained, a naga. On seeing him, he went to him and said, "Master, are you a deva?"[2]

    "No, brahman, I am not a deva."

    "Are you a gandhabba?"

    "No..."

    "... a yakkha?"

    "No..."

    "... a human being?"

    "No, brahman, I am not a human being."

    "When asked, 'Are you a deva?' you answer, 'No, brahman, I am not a deva.' When asked, 'Are you a gandhabba?' you answer, 'No, brahman, I am not a gandhabba.' When asked, 'Are you a yakkha?' you answer, 'No, brahman, I am not a yakkha.' When asked, 'Are you a human being?' you answer, 'No, brahman, I am not a human being.' Then what sort of being are you?"

    "Brahman, the fermentations by which — if they were not abandoned — I would be a deva: Those are abandoned by me, their root destroyed, made like a palmyra stump, deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for future arising. The fermentations by which — if they were not abandoned — I would be a gandhabba... a yakkha... a human being: Those are abandoned by me, their root destroyed, made like a palmyra stump, deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for future arising.

    "Just like a red, blue, or white lotus — born in the water, grown in the water, rising up above the water — stands unsmeared by the water, in the same way I — born in the world, grown in the world, having overcome the world — live unsmeared by the world. Remember me, brahman, as 'awakened [buddha].' AN 4.36 PTS: A ii 37 http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html

    [2]The Buddha's refusal to identify himself as a human being relates to a point made throughout the Canon, that an awakened person cannot be defined in any way at all. On this point, see MN 72, SN 22.85, SN 22.86, and the article, "A Verb for Nirvana." Because a mind with clinging is "located" by its clinging, an awakened person takes no place in any world: this is why he/she is unsmeared by the world (loka), like the lotus unsmeared by water.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
manas
Posts: 2678
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:04 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by manas »

tiltbillings wrote:...
:goodpost: Hi Tilt, great quotes, but a concern could be that, a total newcomer to Buddhism - and many in the audience would be such - might easily misconstrue the statement that the Buddha was 'not a human being'; the subtlety of the actual meaning would most likely slip right past them. I think it's best if newcomers are told that 'he was a human being who attained enlightenment' so they don't get confused...

kind regards,
manas.
To the Buddha-refuge i go; to the Dhamma-refuge i go; to the Sangha-refuge i go.
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by tiltbillings »

manas wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:...
:goodpost: Hi Tilt, great quotes, but a concern could be that, a total newcomer to Buddhism - and many in the audience would be such - might easily misconstrue the statement that the Buddha was 'not a human being'; the subtlety of the actual meaning would most likely slip right past them. I think it's best if newcomers are told that 'he was a human being who attained enlightenment' so they don't get confused...

kind regards,
manas.
Learning a new religion takes work, and one will be constantly revising (American meaning of the word) what one learns. Confusion is a normal part of the process, and revision and confusion are a normal part of the process for those who have been at it for many years, and hopefully, however, there is also clarity and insight.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
kmath
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by kmath »

manas wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:...
:goodpost: Hi Tilt, great quotes, but a concern could be that, a total newcomer to Buddhism - and many in the audience would be such - might easily misconstrue the statement that the Buddha was 'not a human being'; the subtlety of the actual meaning would most likely slip right past them. I think it's best if newcomers are told that 'he was a human being who attained enlightenment' so they don't get confused...

kind regards,
manas.
:goodpost:
SarathW
Posts: 21257
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by SarathW »

Hi Tilt
Thanks. I got my one inch forward!
:)
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
User avatar
robertk
Posts: 5620
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by robertk »

I think that is a rather misleading translation as it should read

..."WILL you be a deva, WILL you be a gandhabba?" etc etc..

Of course he wont be any of these as the Buddha has uprooted all conditions leading to rebirth
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by tiltbillings »

Off topic posting removed. Please stay on topic.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 17194
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by DNS »

I think Jack Kornfield did good. He was very calm and composed and answered well given his audience. He was not talking to Buddhists. The viewers I imagine would be mostly Christian, Jewish, agnostics, atheists, and new agers. Imagine how many he might have turned away if he answered something like:

O: What is God to you?
JK: There is no God.

O: So what is the soul to you?
JK: There is no soul, next question.

O: Then who is sitting here with me discussing this?
JK: Simple, by paṭiccasamuppāda, there is avijjā which conditions viññāna, taṇhā and a host of other factors causing jāti.

Instead he basically described the aggregates and said it is fine if people want to call that a "soul." And for God, he gave an explanation devoid of any person or being. Not entirely traditional or canonical, but still a pretty good answer, given the audience.
User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 6594
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:55 pm
Location: USA

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by Mkoll »

David N. Snyder wrote:Imagine how many he might have turned away if he answered something like:

O: What is God to you?
JK: There is no God.

O: So what is the soul to you?
JK: There is no soul, next question.

O: Then who is sitting here with me discussing this?
JK: Simple, by paṭiccasamuppāda, there is avijjā which conditions viññāna, taṇhā and a host of other factors causing jāti.
:clap:

:anjali:
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19945
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Oprah & Jack Kornfield

Post by mikenz66 »

Thanks David... :)

I also thought it was fine. It's like the public talks that the Dalai Lama gives. Going into technicalities in those circumstances would be totally ineffective. But the opportunity to demonstrate to the audience that there might be something worth investigating, that the kindness and compassion must be coming from something special, is huge.

:anjali:
Mike
Post Reply