The Brahmajāla-sutta

Textual analysis and comparative discussion on early Buddhist sects and texts.

The Brahmajāla-sutta

Postby drpaulfuller » Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:09 pm

drpaulfuller
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:03 pm

Re: The Brahmajāla-sutta

Postby boris » Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:04 am

63rd View?

The Brahmajāla-sutta, we may think, does not explicitly contain a sixty-third view which is the insight and knowledge which gives the correct proposition in opposition to the sixty-two views. This is true as far as it goes, but also misleading. In my understanding, the Brahmajāla-sutta does suggest what correct knowledge is. This is knowledge (or understanding) of rise and fall, the anuloma and paṭiloma (forward and reverse) knowledge (or understanding) of ‘dependent-origination’ (paṭicca-samuppāda):


It is wrong idea to put right view in the same level as 62 brahmajala views. Rison is simple: righ view is view only on verbal plane, in reality it is direct knowlegde. 62 views are dependent on sakkya-ditthi, but to be free from sakkaya-diithi it is not matter of rational view which can be attained by only reasoning, but direct experience of sotapanna.
The man who wants to avoid grotesque collapses should not look for anything to fulfill him in space and time.

Nicolás Gómez Dávila
boris
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:00 pm

Re: The Brahmajāla-sutta

Postby Pondera » Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:25 am

Oh no! I think someone is applying Gödel's incompleteness theorem to the Brahmajala!!!! :sage:
User avatar
Pondera
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:02 pm


Return to Early Buddhism

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest