Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Is there any basis in the Pali canon for the claim that you only need to attain first jhana in order to complete the path? I think I've read that claim in at least two places, and sort of accepted it as common wisdom, but now I'm having trouble finding scriptural support for it.
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Hello fivebells,
You may find this teaching article by Bhikkhu Bodhi clarifies things for you:
The Jhanas and the Lay Disciple according to the Pali Suttas
http://www.viet.net/anson/ebud/ebdha267.htm
with metta,
Chris
You may find this teaching article by Bhikkhu Bodhi clarifies things for you:
The Jhanas and the Lay Disciple according to the Pali Suttas
http://www.viet.net/anson/ebud/ebdha267.htm
with metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
AN 9.36fivebells wrote:Is there any basis in the Pali canon for the claim that you only need to attain first jhana in order to complete the path?
AN 9.36: Jhana Sutta wrote: "Suppose that an archer or archer's apprentice were to practice on a straw man or mound of clay, so that after a while he would become able to shoot long distances, to fire accurate shots in rapid succession, and to pierce great masses. In the same way, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born of seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. He regards whatever phenomena there that are connected with form, feeling, perception, fabrications, & consciousness, as inconstant, stressful, a disease, a cancer, an arrow, painful, an affliction, alien, a disintegration, an emptiness, not-self. He turns his mind away from those phenomena, and having done so, inclines his mind to the property of deathlessness: 'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.'
"Staying right there, he reaches the ending of the mental fermentations. Or, if not, then — through this very dhamma-passion, this very dhamma-delight, and from the total wasting away of the first five of the fetters — he is due to be reborn [in the Pure Abodes], there to be totally unbound, never again to return from that world.
-
- Posts: 10172
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Thanks for that. However the succeeding lines in this sutta seem to paint a different picture, since they refer to the full set of 8 jhanas - why do suttas like this describe the full set of 8 jhanas if the 1st jhana alone is sufficient?culaavuso wrote:AN 9.36: Jhana Sutta wrote: "....there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the first jhana: ....He turns his mind away from those phenomena, and having done so, inclines his mind to the property of deathlessness: 'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.'
"'I tell you, the ending of the mental fermentations depends on the first jhana.' Thus was it said, and in reference to this was it said.
(Similarly with the second, third, and fourth jhana.)
"'I tell you, the ending of the mental fermentations depends on the dimension of the infinitude of space.' Thus it has been said. In reference to what was it said? There is the case where a monk, with the complete transcending of perceptions of [physical] form, with the disappearance of perceptions of resistance, and not heeding perceptions of diversity, [perceiving,] 'Infinite space,' enters & remains in the dimension of the infinitude of space."
Buddha save me from new-agers!
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Hi SN
The way I understand What ever the level of jhanas, it is important that the meditator desern the following.
=============
He regards whatever phenomena there that are connected with form, feeling, perception, fabrications, & consciousness, as inconstant, stressful, a disease, a cancer, an arrow, painful, an affliction, alien, a disintegration, an emptiness, not-self. He turns his mind away from those phenomena, and having done so, inclines his mind to the property of deathlessness: 'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.'
============
Some meditators may decern it in the first jhana, others may decern it in another level of jhana.
The way I understand What ever the level of jhanas, it is important that the meditator desern the following.
=============
He regards whatever phenomena there that are connected with form, feeling, perception, fabrications, & consciousness, as inconstant, stressful, a disease, a cancer, an arrow, painful, an affliction, alien, a disintegration, an emptiness, not-self. He turns his mind away from those phenomena, and having done so, inclines his mind to the property of deathlessness: 'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.'
============
Some meditators may decern it in the first jhana, others may decern it in another level of jhana.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Thanks, everyone. I independently remembered that this is covered in the Right Concentration section of Wings to Awakening., but couldn't delete the question because I'd accidentally put it in a moderator queue.
Spiny, I think "depends" must be a confusing translation.
Spiny, I think "depends" must be a confusing translation.
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
See Ven. Thanissaro's important introductory note to SN 12.70: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
I presume because the first jhana might not be sufficient for just anyone.Spiny Norman wrote:Thanks for that. However the succeeding lines in this sutta seem to paint a different picture, since they refer to the full set of 8 jhanas - why do suttas like this describe the full set of 8 jhanas if the 1st jhana alone is sufficient?
A similar formulation from MN 20:
First it says:
and it seems like a complete instruction."There is the case where evil, unskillful thoughts — imbued with desire, aversion, or delusion — arise in a monk while he is referring to and attending to a particular theme. He should attend to another theme, apart from that one, connected with what is skillful. When he is attending to this other theme, apart from that one, connected with what is skillful, then those evil, unskillful thoughts — imbued with desire, aversion, or delusion — are abandoned and subside. With their abandoning, he steadies his mind right within, settles it, unifies it, and concentrates it. Just as a skilled carpenter or his apprentice would use a small peg to knock out, drive out, and pull out a large one; in the same way, if evil, unskillful thoughts — imbued with desire, aversion, or delusion — arise in a monk while he is referring to and attending to a particular theme, he should attend to another theme, apart from that one, connected with what is skillful. When he is attending to this other theme, apart from that one, connected with what is skillful, then those evil, unskillful thoughts — imbued with desire, aversion, or delusion — are abandoned and subside. With their abandoning, he steadies his mind right within, settles it, unifies it, and concentrates it.
But then it goes on to say:
The idea is that even though the meditator is applying all those practices, evil, unskilful thoughts can still arise in his mind. That doesn't mean they will, but that they could. (Until he uses the sledge-hammer, that is, gritting his teeth and using overwhelming force.)"If evil, unskillful thoughts — imbued with desire, aversion, or delusion — still arise in the monk while he is attending to this other theme, connected with what is skillful, he should scrutinize the drawbacks of those thoughts
/.../
In a similar gradual manner the application of the four sublime attitudes in AN 5.161. First one develops goodwill for the person whom one hates. If goodwill doesn't subdue the hatred, then one develops compassion. If compassion doesn't subdue the hatred, then one develops sympathetic joy. If sympathetic joy doesn't subdue the hatred, then one develops equanimity. If after that, hatred still persists, one should ignore the person. If that doesn't subdue the hatred either, then one should reflect on karma. (And this one surely will.)
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 2:55 pm
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Nandakovada Sutta. Even just listening to the Sutta or reading it is enough. The main point is knowing none of it is me or mine. Seeing your own subatomic particles is a waste of life.fivebells wrote:Is there any basis in the Pali canon for the claim that you only need to attain first jhana in order to complete the path? I think I've read that claim in at least two places, and sort of accepted it as common wisdom, but now I'm having trouble finding scriptural support for it.
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
suttametta wrote:Nandakovada Sutta. Even just listening to the Sutta or reading it is enough. The main point is knowing none of it is me or mine. Seeing your own subatomic particles is a waste of life.fivebells wrote:Is there any basis in the Pali canon for the claim that you only need to attain first jhana in order to complete the path? I think I've read that claim in at least two places, and sort of accepted it as common wisdom, but now I'm having trouble finding scriptural support for it.
hi suttametta
i fail to see your point in relation to the OP. without wishing to get into an arguement with you, can you explain please.
excuse me if it is my own ignorance preventing me from seeing your point.
Aflame with the fire of passion, the fire of aversion, the fire of delusion.
Aflame, with birth, aging & death, with sorrows, lamentations, pains, distresses, & despairs ......
Seeing thus, the disciple of the Noble One grows disenchanted. SN 35.28
Aflame, with birth, aging & death, with sorrows, lamentations, pains, distresses, & despairs ......
Seeing thus, the disciple of the Noble One grows disenchanted. SN 35.28
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 2:55 pm
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
kitztack wrote:suttametta wrote:Nandakovada Sutta. Even just listening to the Sutta or reading it is enough. The main point is knowing none of it is me or mine. Seeing your own subatomic particles is a waste of life.fivebells wrote:Is there any basis in the Pali canon for the claim that you only need to attain first jhana in order to complete the path? I think I've read that claim in at least two places, and sort of accepted it as common wisdom, but now I'm having trouble finding scriptural support for it.
hi suttametta
i fail to see your point in relation to the OP. without wishing to get into an arguement with you, can you explain please.
excuse me if it is my own ignorance preventing me from seeing your point.
Ok if you read this Sutta one can see these points are not realized in a deep meditative state. Ones thinking faculty is active. This is the first jhana only. Yet, by engaging in these thought patterns, the I thought is decided upon as not me, not mine... Nibbana is had by this method.
-
- Posts: 10172
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Yes, I think that's a reasonable assumption. But there do seem to be a lot of suttas which describe progression through the "full set" of 8 jhanas, which makes me wonder.binocular wrote:I presume because the first jhana might not be sufficient for just anyone.Spiny Norman wrote:Thanks for that. However the succeeding lines in this sutta seem to paint a different picture, since they refer to the full set of 8 jhanas - why do suttas like this describe the full set of 8 jhanas if the 1st jhana alone is sufficient?
Buddha save me from new-agers!
-
- Posts: 10172
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Yes, could be, though it seems to be applied throughout the sutta.fivebells wrote: Spiny, I think "depends" must be a confusing translation.
Buddha save me from new-agers!
-
- Posts: 10172
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Yes, could be. But I still wonder why there are so many suttas which describe progression through all 8 jhanas?SarathW wrote: Some meditators may decern it in the first jhana, others may decern it in another level of jhana.
Buddha save me from new-agers!
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 2:55 pm
Re: Basis for the claim that you only need 1st jhana?
Because Buddha wanted folks to be thorough. He also taught different methods based on the different people.Spiny Norman wrote:Yes, could be. But I still wonder why there are so many suttas which describe progression through all 8 jhanas?SarathW wrote: Some meditators may decern it in the first jhana, others may decern it in another level of jhana.