Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Exploring the Dhamma, as understood from the perspective of the ancient Pali commentaries.
Post Reply
User avatar
steinghan
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:27 am

Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by steinghan »

Hi All

I've recently got my curiousity triggered with respect to exactly which professions involve earning one's living by a wrong form of livelihood, so wonder if those more learned in the Pali canon than I, can help with these questions:

Is there anywhere in the Theravada canon, where the professions in breach of right livelihood (samma ajiva) are explicitly mentioned? In lieu of that, which suttas or other canonical sources are the most accurate with respect to such professions?
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by Ben »

This should get the ball rolling:
"Monks, a lay follower should not engage in five types of business. Which five? Business in weapons, business in human beings, business in meat, business in intoxicants, and business in poison.

"These are the five types of business that a lay follower should not engage in."
-- AN 5.177
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4644
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

Please see this other thread which discusses the topic in more detail.

It is an important topic. The way that you earn a living has a powerful effect because it the kamma that you are doing every day.

Even if your livelihood is not immoral or wrong-livelihood according toe the strict definition of the texts, it still has a significant effect on your future happiness.

In our modern materialistic society, there are many ways of earning a living that depend on encouraging foolishness, and the endless pursuit of sensual pleasures. It may be perfectly lawful and not immoral pleasures, but it is not a wholesome livelihood.

The ideal livelihood would be one that encourages wholesome kamma such as giving charity, observing morality, learning, or the development of wisdom.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
steinghan
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:27 am

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by steinghan »

Thank you both, for replying. I have red through that other thread mentioned. As far as canonical text goes, I found only the same sutra already posted here together, together with a related, very freely translated commentary. Apart from some references to dhammapada and a sutra - both at most only indirectly related to the topic of "professions involve earning one's living by a wrong form of livelihood" -, the said thread only contains personal opinions and interpretations.

Can I take it that the one and only sutta known to readers of this thread and naming the professions in question is AN 5.177 ?
anando
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:41 pm

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by anando »

Hi,
the only profession that is allowed ist the one of a teacher.

anando
Ananda26
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:41 pm

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by Ananda26 »

steinghan wrote:Hi All

I've recently got my curiousity triggered with respect to exactly which professions involve earning one's living by a wrong form of livelihood, so wonder if those more learned in the Pali canon than I, can help with these questions:

Is there anywhere in the Theravada canon, where the professions in breach of right livelihood (samma ajiva) are explicitly mentioned? In lieu of that, which suttas or other canonical sources are the most accurate with respect to such professions?
"Monks, a lay follower should not engage in five types of business. Which five? Business in weapons, business in beings(such as selling animals), business in meat, business in intoxicants, and business in poison.

"These are the five types of business that a lay follower should not engage in."
User avatar
TheNoBSBuddhist
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:06 pm
Location: Loch Lomond, via the High AND Low road....

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by TheNoBSBuddhist »

anando wrote:Hi,
the only profession that is allowed ist the one of a teacher.

anando
I find that extremely difficult to both digest and agree with....

Where is the source of your comment, please?
:namaste:

You will not be punished FOR your 'emotions'; you will be punished BY your 'emotions'.



Image

Pay attention, simplify, and (Meditation instruction in a nutshell) "Mind - the Gap."
‘Absit invidia verbo’ - may ill-will be absent from the word. And mindful of that, if I don't respond, this may be why....
User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 17169
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by DNS »

anando wrote: the only profession that is allowed ist the one of a teacher.
No. A person who works for a garbage removal company driving a truck to pick up your garbage by the curb is not teaching anyone anything, yet it is wholesome work and not one of the wrong livelihoods (and of course numerous other examples like this too).
User avatar
seeker242
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:01 am

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by seeker242 »

steinghan wrote:Thank you both, for replying. I have red through that other thread mentioned. As far as canonical text goes, I found only the same sutra already posted here together, together with a related, very freely translated commentary. Apart from some references to dhammapada and a sutra - both at most only indirectly related to the topic of "professions involve earning one's living by a wrong form of livelihood" -, the said thread only contains personal opinions and interpretations.

Can I take it that the one and only sutta known to readers of this thread and naming the professions in question is AN 5.177 ?
That is the only one I've ever seen. However, one has to use some common sense I think. For example, if your livelihood intrinsically requires you to break any of the precepts, you could easily say it's "wrong livelihood", even if it's not one of the specific 5 professions above.
culaavuso
Posts: 1363
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by culaavuso »

steinghan wrote: Can I take it that the one and only sutta known to readers of this thread and naming the professions in question is AN 5.177 ?
There are also discussions of livelihood in SN 42.2 and SN 42.3 which discuss occupations other than those listed in AN 5.177.
User avatar
TheNoBSBuddhist
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:06 pm
Location: Loch Lomond, via the High AND Low road....

Re: Wrong livelihood - which professions?

Post by TheNoBSBuddhist »

culaavuso wrote:
steinghan wrote: Can I take it that the one and only sutta known to readers of this thread and naming the professions in question is AN 5.177 ?
There are also discussions of livelihood in SN 42.2 and SN 42.3 which discuss occupations other than those listed in AN 5.177.
The two links listed, actually refer more to 'Wrong Views' held by those making presumptions about favourable rebirths after they cease to exist in the professions they follow.... It's not to say that those professions are wrong, necessarily.
:namaste:

You will not be punished FOR your 'emotions'; you will be punished BY your 'emotions'.



Image

Pay attention, simplify, and (Meditation instruction in a nutshell) "Mind - the Gap."
‘Absit invidia verbo’ - may ill-will be absent from the word. And mindful of that, if I don't respond, this may be why....
Post Reply