Some meditators say that we can’t hear sounds in jhāna, not even the first one. They speak by conviction of their own experience, and I agree. It’s true we can’t hear sounds in the Visuddhimagga type of jhāna. However, some among them claim that they are going by the Suttas, citing the Kaṇṭaka Sutta (AN10.72), which says, “Sound is a thorn (i.e., bother, source of discomfort) to the first jhāna.” (paṭhamassa jhānassa saddo kaṇṭako)
But does this statement support that view? If sound is a thorn to the first jhāna, it means one can hear sound in that state, doesn’t it? If not, sound wouldn’t be a thorn at all. Would something be a thorn to you if you can’t perceive it?
Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
From my experience and from reading that very same sutta, sound is not present in first Jhāna.
To maybe understand the sutta better, lets see the Pāḷi:
- vitakkavicārā is not present in 2nd Jhāna
- pīti is not present in the 3rd Jhāna
- assāsapassāso is not present in the 4th Jhāna
If we switch "thorn" (kaṇṭakā) by "is not present" for the 2nd, 3rd & 4th Jhānas in this sutta, this seems to fit with all the other suttas. This indicates that if we do the same with the 1st Jhāna, we are left with "saddo is not present in 1st Jhāna".
To maybe understand the sutta better, lets see the Pāḷi:
We know from many other suttas that:dasayime, bhikkhave, kaṇṭakā. katame dasa? pavivekārāmassa saṅgaṇikārāmatā kaṇṭako, asubhanimittānuyogaṃ anuyuttassa subhanimittānuyogo kaṇṭako, indriyesu guttadvārassa visūkadassanaṃ kaṇṭako, brahmacariyassa mātugāmūpacāro kaṇṭako, paṭhamassa jhānassa saddo kaṇṭako, dutiyassa jhānassa vitakkavicārā kaṇṭakā, tatiyassa jhānassa pīti kaṇṭako, catutthassa jhānassa assāsapassāso kaṇṭako, saññāvedayitanirodhasamāpattiyā saññā ca vedanā ca kaṇṭako rāgo kaṇṭako doso kaṇṭako moho kaṇṭako.
- vitakkavicārā is not present in 2nd Jhāna
- pīti is not present in the 3rd Jhāna
- assāsapassāso is not present in the 4th Jhāna
If we switch "thorn" (kaṇṭakā) by "is not present" for the 2nd, 3rd & 4th Jhānas in this sutta, this seems to fit with all the other suttas. This indicates that if we do the same with the 1st Jhāna, we are left with "saddo is not present in 1st Jhāna".
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
I think the bottom of the problem is
1) The vsm's 1st jhana includes ekaggata whereas the suttas' first jhana doesn't, and the suttas should be relied on more
2) many people who follow blindly the vsm refuse to acknowledge the fact above mentioned
so I would say that yes one can hear sounds in the suttas' first jhana, and not in the vsm's first jhana
1) The vsm's 1st jhana includes ekaggata whereas the suttas' first jhana doesn't, and the suttas should be relied on more
2) many people who follow blindly the vsm refuse to acknowledge the fact above mentioned
so I would say that yes one can hear sounds in the suttas' first jhana, and not in the vsm's first jhana
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli
http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
is there any logical semantic reason to do that?Unrul3r wrote: If we switch "thorn" (kaṇṭakā) by "is not present"
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli
http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
No, the point I'm trying to make there, is coherence with other suttas. I'm using these words to make the coherence clear.Sekha wrote:is there any logical semantic reason to do that?Unrul3r wrote: If we switch "thorn" (kaṇṭakā) by "is not present"
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
I don't think the meaning of this word needs to be altered for this sutta to be consistent with other suttas, except those where abhidhamma lines have been incorporated (a few ones in MN) and where ekaggata has been added as a first jhana factor.Unrul3r wrote:No, the point I'm trying to make there, is coherence with other suttas. I'm using these words to make the coherence clear.Sekha wrote:is there any logical semantic reason to do that?Unrul3r wrote: If we switch "thorn" (kaṇṭakā) by "is not present"
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli
http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
Huh?Unrul3r wrote:From my experience and from reading that very same sutta, sound is not present in first Jhāna.
...
If we switch "thorn" (kaṇṭakā) by "is not present" for the 2nd, 3rd & 4th Jhānas in this sutta, this seems to fit with all the other suttas.
So, we are to 'adjust' to suttas to fit into our experience? Oh dear!
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
Look guys, you are free to think whatever you want. I just made 2 points one was in regards to my experience, another was in regards to coherence with the many other suttas. You can discard both if you wish, I just tried to help.
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
I don't doubt your experience at all. In fact, I understand it very well.Unrul3r wrote:Look guys, you are free to think whatever you want. I just made 2 points one was in regards to my experience, another was in regards to coherence with the many other suttas. You can discard both if you wish, I just tried to help.
The question to ask is whether the experience is Vism jhana or Sutta jhana.
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
The lack of clarity is well clarified in Tapussa Sutta, in which we find details of how the Ascetic Gotama progressed through the jhānas. It's among the suttas that the Vism's understanding can't fit in.Unrul3r wrote:To maybe understand the sutta better, lets see the Pāḷi:
dasayime, bhikkhave, kaṇṭakā. katame dasa? pavivekārāmassa saṅgaṇikārāmatā kaṇṭako, asubhanimittānuyogaṃ anuyuttassa subhanimittānuyogo kaṇṭako, indriyesu guttadvārassa visūkadassanaṃ kaṇṭako, brahmacariyassa mātugāmūpacāro kaṇṭako, paṭhamassa jhānassa saddo kaṇṭako, dutiyassa jhānassa vitakkavicārā kaṇṭakā, tatiyassa jhānassa pīti kaṇṭako, catutthassa jhānassa assāsapassāso kaṇṭako, saññāvedayitanirodhasamāpattiyā saññā ca vedanā ca kaṇṭako rāgo kaṇṭako doso kaṇṭako moho kaṇṭako.
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
Suttas say thay 5 senses are absent only in the arupa-spheres. So, as it seems, sound can be heard in 1-4 jhanas.
"Friend, what can be known with the purified intellect-consciousness divorced from the five [sense] faculties?"
"Friend, with the purified intellect-consciousness divorced from the five faculties the dimension of the infinitude of space can be known [as] 'infinite space.' The dimension of the infinitude of consciousness can be known [as] 'infinite consciousness.' The dimension of nothingness can be known [as] 'There is nothing.'
MN 43
8. "It may be that, with the entire transcending of perceptions of corporeality,[13] with the disappearance of perceptions of sense-response,'[14] with non-attention to perceptions of variety,[15] thinking: 'Space is infinite,' some monk enters upon and abides in the sphere of infinite space;
[14] - Perceptions of sense-response (lit. resistance, patigha-sañña) are perceptions arisen through the impact of the physical sense bases (eye, etc.) and their objects.
MN 8
"Friend, what can be known with the purified intellect-consciousness divorced from the five [sense] faculties?"
"Friend, with the purified intellect-consciousness divorced from the five faculties the dimension of the infinitude of space can be known [as] 'infinite space.' The dimension of the infinitude of consciousness can be known [as] 'infinite consciousness.' The dimension of nothingness can be known [as] 'There is nothing.'
MN 43
8. "It may be that, with the entire transcending of perceptions of corporeality,[13] with the disappearance of perceptions of sense-response,'[14] with non-attention to perceptions of variety,[15] thinking: 'Space is infinite,' some monk enters upon and abides in the sphere of infinite space;
[14] - Perceptions of sense-response (lit. resistance, patigha-sañña) are perceptions arisen through the impact of the physical sense bases (eye, etc.) and their objects.
MN 8
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
Indeed. But not true for the VisM jhana, I must add.Zom wrote:Suttas say thay 5 senses are absent only in the arupa-spheres. So, as it seems, sound can be heard in 1-4 jhanas.
When we make a distinction between the two, much disagreement about this issue can be settled. Much, but not all. For those who insist that their experience of a state cut-off from the 5 senses is the Sutta jhana, it'll never be settled.
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
Perhaps you should read what AN 9.37 has to say. It's not difficult to plot each of the predicates described by Ven Ananda to the female wanderer against their occurences in the suttas.
Where does MN 43 say "only"? Granted, you won't be the first to use this argument, given the Sautrantika resort recorded in the Kosa. I have demonstrated previously that this commits a very basic logical fallacy.
Time to confront a finding from Textual Critism. We owe it to the naughty Sarvastivadins for their Abhidharmic definition of namarupa that Vsm-bashers do not even realise informs tbeir reading of the suttas. Thank goodness BB has forsaken his MN experiment of Tavatimsa speak and reverted to the plain Indian sense of rupa.
Where does MN 43 say "only"? Granted, you won't be the first to use this argument, given the Sautrantika resort recorded in the Kosa. I have demonstrated previously that this commits a very basic logical fallacy.
Time to confront a finding from Textual Critism. We owe it to the naughty Sarvastivadins for their Abhidharmic definition of namarupa that Vsm-bashers do not even realise informs tbeir reading of the suttas. Thank goodness BB has forsaken his MN experiment of Tavatimsa speak and reverted to the plain Indian sense of rupa.
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
I wouldn't jump to conclusions this quickly. Your conclusion seems too far fetched for me. Interpreting the meaning of a text that relates not so trivially to something about which one has probably no experience at all, is pretty risky.Zom wrote:Suttas say thay 5 senses are absent only in the arupa-spheres. So, as it seems, sound can be heard in 1-4 jhanas.
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli
http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Can We Hear Sound in Jhāna?
Cessation of perception and feelings occurs in 9th Jhana.
Isn't sound consider as perception and feeling?
Isn't sound consider as perception and feeling?
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”