Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

A place to discuss casual topics amongst spiritual friends.
User avatar
zavk
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by zavk »

Hi friends,

I believe most of you had heard about this?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/ ... ckson-jive" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The producers of the show and the performers have insisted that it was not racist. So would many viewers, I believe. But even if it is conceded that this isn't a reflection of latent racism in Australia, it'd be hard to deny that this reveals a high degree of provincialism, if not sheer ignorance, in this country (and in humankind more generally.)

Some people have argued that Harry Conick Jr. was wrong to conflate America's history with Australian history. But the spectre of 'blackness' haunts Australia too. Moreover, if we follow this line of argument, are we then to assume that it is ok for all cultures without a black history (or any other 'colour') to lampoon those people of colour and be free from the obligation to consider the ethics of their actions?

The frontman of the group has been quoted:

"Anyone who knows us as a group, we are intelligent people, we are all from different racial backgrounds so I am really truly surprised." (http://www.theage.com.au/news/entertain ... 91299.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)

Intelligent? Why, I am surprised too.
With metta,
zavk
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Ed,

I've read quite a lot of comments about this, but I've not seen the performance.

In their defence, I think the blackening and the wigs had much more to do with trying to make it obvious they were being the Jackson Five. If it wasn't clear that it was (a white) Michael Jackson at the front, and 4 dark singers/dancers in the back, they could just as well have been impersonating a 90's boy band, for all anyone knew.

The daggy segment Red Faces on which they appeared on has always been the home of very cheap homemade skits, and they certainly used inexpensive home-style props in their act.

In the name of entertainment we see men dressed as women, women dressed as men, straight acting gay, gay acting straight... even black men acting as white women...

White Chicks (2004) - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381707/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Where is the line drawn, and on what basis?

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by Ben »

Thanks Ed
I was working last night so I didn't hear about this until this morning.
I've been apalled by what's being reported today. Not only the 'blackface' issue, but also the reporting of the details of the alleged murder of a young girl who was thrown from West Gate Bridge in the pre-trial hearing.
The blackface skit was insensitive at best. Its not like, we've had a history of harmony and racial equality with our indigineous peoples. But that's the sort of boganesque crap that we'll get if 'Hey Hey' is brought back from obscurity. Marieke Hardy wrote a great opinion piece here: http://www.theage.com.au/news/entertain ... 51254.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Kind regards

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 4529
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by Dan74 »

I haven't seen the skit in question, Ed, but I've noticed a spectre of neo-PC emerging in Australian media. Chaser was always under fire for something or other, recently John Saffran and now Hey hey. Well, for crying out loud, it's comedy!

It may be bad comedy (I've never been a fan of Hey hey). But comedy by nature is hit and miss. And by nature it has to make fun of taboos, cross lines, etc. A baffoon of old was even allowed to make fun of the king! There are traditions all over the world of this kind of a release. But now it seems that comedians need to be strapped into this procrustean bed of political correctness.

I was all for PC when they spoke of gender-neutral language, or eradicating terms that are demeaning or patronising. But surely allowance has to be made for comedy. Of course some lines do need to be drawn, but I think they are being drawn way too tightly at the moment.

_/|\_
_/|\_
User avatar
zavk
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by zavk »

retrofuturist wrote:In their defence, I think the blackening and the wigs had much more to do with trying to make it obvious they were being the Jackson Five. If it wasn't clear that it was (a white) Michael Jackson at the front, and 4 dark singers/dancers in the back, they could just as well have been impersonating a 90's boy band, for all anyone knew.
Hi Retro

Yes, it could perhaps be true that they didn't do it with ill intentions. In fact, I don't think they did. But because they are lampooning the Jackson Five and Michael Jackson, highlighting as they have their complexions, the shadowy issue of race--the spectre of 'blackness'--was already there from the very start, irregardless of whether they intended for it to be or not.

So even if it weren't their intention to be racist, it remains the case that there was an appalling degree of ignorance and lack of ethical consideration on their part--which, of course, from a Buddhist perspective is an affliction that we humankind irregardless of 'national boundaries' are born into.
Last edited by zavk on Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
With metta,
zavk
User avatar
zavk
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by zavk »

Hi Dan

Yes, I agree with you that PC-ness can sometimes be a poor excuse for curtailing free expression.

I should perhaps clarify that in posting this, I am not seeking to apportion praise or blame on anyone. I think this incident is a stark reminder of just how pervasive avijja or ignorance is. It also underscores the need for constant ethical reflection on what we choose to do.
With metta,
zavk
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,

This incident reminds me a little of this episode of South Park.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chef_Goes_Nanners" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And during the debate on whether the South Park flag should be changed...

Image
When the turn of Stan's team comes, Chef and the rest of the adults find out that it had not even noticed that the flag was racist, thinking that the issue at hand was capital punishment. Chef realises that, when the children looked at the flag, they only saw five people, with no regard to their colors, and is touched: he realises that, in believing the whole town racist while throwing the slur "cracker" around, he was being the racist one.
Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
Senex
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:37 am
Location: Canada

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by Senex »

South Park can get away with making fun of pretty much anything because they make fun of everything, they don't just hunt after one group.
Words exist because of meaning; once you've gotten the meaning, you can forget the words. Where can I find a man who has forgotten words so I can have a word with him?

Zhuangzi, chapter 26
(B. Watson, The Complete Works of Chuang-tzu, 302)
User avatar
Jechbi
Posts: 1268
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:38 am
Contact:

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by Jechbi »

retrofuturist wrote:Where is the line drawn, and on what basis?
I would think historical context is an important consideration. This is not the same thing as men dressed as women, black men dressing as white women, etc. There are certain things that, due to their historical context, you just don't do. Like display a noose in the workplace. Or perform in blackface. It sends a chilling message of (at best) callous disregard for those who must still live with the reality of racial discrimination.
Rain soddens what is kept wrapped up,
But never soddens what is open;
Uncover, then, what is concealed,
Lest it be soddened by the rain.
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Jechbi,

Yes, but those are predominantly American cultural considerations associated with blackfacing.

By way of contrast, consider Britain's highly successful and long-running series...

The Black and White Minstrel Show (1958-1978)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_ ... strel_Show" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Which was obviously produced and broadcast in an era after the events of the "historical context" you refer to.

Something must have happened in the 30 years since the Black And White Minstrel Show... the question is, is it some kind of enlightenment regarding race, or is it rampant political correctness? Or is it a concern about rubbing it in the fact of an entertainer, raised in the South, who was inspired by black performers and therefore has an acute awareness of this "historical context".

I don't think there's a clear answer to that question either way, it's probably a bit of all three.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by Ben »

Political correctness?
Paul, I think the event that happened in the last 30 years was the introduction of anti-discrimination legislation and the resultant realisation within the community that some forms of behaviour are unconscionable and should be sanctioned.
Kind regards

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Ben,
Ben wrote:Political correctness?
Yes... that's one factor in this.

Baa, baa rainbow sheep
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... sheep.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
zavk
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by zavk »

retrofuturist wrote:Greetings,
retrofuturist wrote:
When the turn of Stan's team comes, Chef and the rest of the adults find out that it had not even noticed that the flag was racist, thinking that the issue at hand was capital punishment. Chef realises that, when the children looked at the flag, they only saw five people, with no regard to their colors, and is touched: he realises that, in believing the whole town racist while throwing the slur "cracker" around, he was being the racist one.
:rofl:

I have to watch this episode. Great insights here. This episode reminds us that racism, sexism and so forth are not self-evident but conditional and relational. Whether we think of ourselves as superior to others or others as inferior to us, what we are and how we behave is influenced by others and we in turn influence others. Chef had come to an important realisation about the underlying complacency and insularity that provides the basis for discriminatory behaviour.

--------------------------

If I may press my point further. Let me say plainly: I DO NOT think the act was intended to be racist. It was a silly oversight. I think we need to look beyond all these arguments about whether it is racist or not. What I take issue with is not the 'racism' of this incident, but the ensuing comments and responses to this incident. More precisely, I take issue with the unexamined premises of these arguments.

People have argued that Australia does not have the same black history as America, or the connotations of blackface minstrel shows do not apply in Australian contexts, or that Harry Connick Jr. (and others who complained) failed to get 'Australian humor', or that the global reaction is just overwrought political correctness. Now, I think these arguments have certain merits. They are not entirely unreasonable.

However, I think that they are unskillful because even as they attempt to demonstrate how racism is conditional, they fail to acknowledge the conditionality of their own positions:
  • 1.) They gloss over Australia's troubled history with its own 'blackness'--this is something that Australia still hasn't come to terms with.

    2.) They mistakenly think that it is possible to invoke the representations of the 'blackface' without the related connotations that come with it--it is not possible to neatly compartmentalize meaning by saying that 'Oh when I use these words or images only this meaning is involved and nothing else.'

    3.) In saying that it is just 'Australian humor', they posit a problematic homogenized 'Australianness' that overlooks the diversity of ethnicity and cultures that makes it impossible to take for granted what 'Australianness' is.

    4.) In saying that people around the world have overreacted, they mistakenly think that Australia can somehow step outside the relationality between nations and cultures in this globalised age.
These arguments do go some ways in demonstrating how the incident is not necessarily racist, but they are themselves rooted in complacency and insularity. They leave the underlying problems of complacency and insularity unacknowledged, unexamined and uncontested.

Fine, I accept that it is not an intentional act of racism. But even as we pursue these arguments about American black history, Australian humour, and so forth, we need to engage with them skilfully so that we do not merely mask--or worse, reinforce--the root problems that caused the debacle in the first place.

So this is what I take issue with: that people are speaking from positions of insularity and complacency to argue against charges of racism. This does not skillfully address the issue for as South Park reminds us, it is insularity and complacency that provides the condition for racism, (hetero)sexism, and all that in the first place.

OK, I shall stop my rant. Perhaps, one reason I'm upset by this incident is because I left my Southeast Asian hyper-materialistic country of origin to escape these attitudes of insularity and complacency that grip the society there. But I suppose these are the underlying conditions of samsara and they are everywhere. The only thing we can really do is cultivate self-reflexivity and work on these problems within ourselves. I have perhaps let myself get overly affected by the perceived lack of self-reflexivity in others. :soap: :cry:

A good time to practice some metta...... :meditate: :heart:
With metta,
zavk
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by Ben »

Its been discussed right now on Q&A on ABC1
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Global disbelief over 'blackface' skit on Australian TV

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Ben,

Let us know the gist of what they say!

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Post Reply