Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Discussion of Samatha bhavana and Jhana bhavana.

Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Reductor » Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:15 am

I'm way out in the boon docks, without any support in practice. That said, I believe I have been experiencing Jhana. I'm interested in any thing people have to offer here, but mostly: do you think you've experienced Jhana, and by what standard are you basing that (written or teacher)? Since I have heard this is a controversial topic, I will understand if no one responds. But I'm hoping.

For me I measure success by what seems to be present, and the order that they are present (Ajaan Lee described Jhana a lot in his writing, which I have read). Since I am having some consistency in my practice, I get to analyze my experiences some. My first experiences involved the sense of the body becoming large and comfortable, with the breath almost like a backdrop for all my experiences/thoughts/etc. I was aware of these other things, but also the breath, always there. Now days I don't get the big body, nor the small body, sense anymore, but just a gradual awakening of the body as the mind also calms and latches onto the breath. A point comes where the breath and my attention do not separate, with the body feeling like a statue: present, relaxed, comfortable and seemingly immovable. I can move, but there seems almost no inclination in the mind to move, even when pain sets in (from sitting on a hard floor I do experience the onset of pain after a time; not sure how long into it). At that point I can rest with the breath as backdrop with very little effort. Mostly I just avoid adjusting the breath and this state will persist. If I focus in on the breath again then things start to change.

There's more, but maybe I should stop here. Mostly, does this sound like it's progressing how it should?

Please forgive me if this thread is inappropriate. Some experienced mediators to talk with (email or other) would be a great boon to me.

Thanks.
Michael

The thoughts I've expressed in the above post are carefully considered and offered in good faith.

And friendliness towards the world is happiness for him who is forbearing with living beings. -- Ud. 2:1
To his own ruin the fool gains knowledge, for it cleaves his head and destroys his innate goodness. -- Dhp 72

User avatar
Reductor
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:52 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Jechbi » Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:09 am

Hi there.

To answer your question, I don't know. But if I were you, I'd be very reluctant to rely on instructions from people on the Internet. And if you're experiencing pain (as you mentioned), then be careful, especially if you're alone.

Where did you learn the sitting practice technique that you are following?

A few words of caution: Try not to set yourself up with expectations. Don't worry too much about labeling what you experience. Let it be whatever it is. And one strange thing: sometimes progress isn't what you think it's supposed to be. Just my 2 cents, one human being to another. Best wishes.
Rain soddens what is kept wrapped up,
But never soddens what is open;
Uncover, then, what is concealed,
Lest it be soddened by the rain.
User avatar
Jechbi
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Ben » Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:14 am

Hi thereductor
I'm 'old school' and so I am disinclined to talk about my meditative experiences on a forum with people I do not know. I usually reserve any discussion with a mentor who I have known for 22+ years and with close confidants(some of whom are here). I understand that you are not in close proximity to a teacher who can guide you but I would urge you to take the time to find a teacher whom you could email your concerns and questions. The problem is, invariably, that certain experiences can be very easily misinterpreted as particular attainments, and the level of knowledge, particularly direct knowledge, of these attainments within the greater sangha, is not as common as one may perceive.
The Buddhist Society of Western Australia might be a good port-of-call for some email-mediated one-to-one advice.
metta

Ben
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.

Taṃ nadīhi vijānātha:
sobbhesu padaresu ca,
saṇantā yanti kusobbhā,
tuṇhīyanti mahodadhī.

Sutta Nipata 3.725


Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR
Buddhist Life Stories of Australia

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 16208
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Land of the sleeping gods

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Reductor » Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:33 am

Ben and Jechbi, thanks for the posts. I too am reluctant in getting instructions over the net. Even in person, I am not prone to relying on other peoples opinion/experience (this is in general life). It is just that a point has come where other perspectives might be useful. I am pretty confident that I have gotten the first and second (they have become recurring and consistent), but deeper samadhi is proving to be more variable for me, and that's where I most worry that I have jumped the rail. There remains the possibility that I have jumped the rail from the word go, and I'm interested in that possibility.

Ben, do you have an email address for that group you mentioned?

Jechbi: I started with Lees method 2, but as time has progressed I have modified it a bit. The steps remain, but the exact 'expression' is a little different. I don't trace any sensations to the various limbs the way the method describes. Instead I feel that I'm able to 'open' the body to awareness, and then I do. From there it remains the same.
Michael

The thoughts I've expressed in the above post are carefully considered and offered in good faith.

And friendliness towards the world is happiness for him who is forbearing with living beings. -- Ud. 2:1
To his own ruin the fool gains knowledge, for it cleaves his head and destroys his innate goodness. -- Dhp 72

User avatar
Reductor
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:52 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Ben » Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:45 am

Hi thereductor
the Buddhist Society of Western Australia www.bswa.org.au maybe quite a good resource for you.
If I am correct, it is the wat where Ajahn Brahm resides and he has a strong focus on jhana.

Go down tothe end of this page for links to teachers: http://www.bswa.org.au/contacts.html
metta

Ben

BTW, to reiterate Jechbi's questions (just out of interest), what technique are you using?
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.

Taṃ nadīhi vijānātha:
sobbhesu padaresu ca,
saṇantā yanti kusobbhā,
tuṇhīyanti mahodadhī.

Sutta Nipata 3.725


Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR
Buddhist Life Stories of Australia

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 16208
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Land of the sleeping gods

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Sudarsha » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:36 pm

Hello, thereductor

I have only just joined but I'm going to leap in, anyway, and we can see what it might be worth.

You say you are in the boon docks which I take to refer to some location in Australia :thinking: , only because of the mention of Ajahn Brahmavamso's web site. I have been practising for something like 45 years and daily wonder if I have just begun: not because meditation itself is difficult or difficult to understand, but because everything is constantly changing and therefore constantly new. To me, the experiences you recount seem almost enviable. Just remember that we cannot step twice into the same river.

From my own perspective, meditation/practise/just sitting ... whatever we call what we do ... is like the half-full bit of the glass. It is the only place we can start. The rest, the half-empty bit, we need to fill with the words of the Buddha, with those words we understand based on our experience and developing wisdom which, as it matures, includes more and more penetration of and filling with the words of the Buddha. I'm very Theravada here, although I have read extensively in the Mahayana and Vajrayana; for me, only the words of the Pali canon make sense. That sense, of course, was aided by the writings of many Roshis, Rinpoches, Ajahns, Senseis and conversations with as many teachers as were available, on the Internet, in print or in the flesh!

The two suttas (easily available from http://www.accesstoinsight.org/), the anapanasati and satipatthana, explain step-by-step how the Buddha taught the process of meditation from start to jhana. In this regard, I think you will find that Ajahn Brahmavamso's web site as well as his Mindfulness, Bliss, and Beyond: A Meditator's Handbook and Bhante Gunaratana's Mindfulness in Plain English and Beyond Mindfulness are very helpful ... if you take them just slowly and easily, no fuss, no rush.

Another easily available essay is Ajahn Sona's The Mystery of the Breath Nimitta (see http://www.arrowriver.ca/dhamma/nimitta.html.

Now (and everyone should make sure to have a red flag and grain of salt handy), I'd like to share a personal insight :jawdrop: -- I think the words parimukhaṁ satiṁ upaṭṭhapetvā, found in both the anapanasati and satipatthana suttas, are especially important. "Parimukhaṁ" is often translated, way too literally in my not especially humble opinion, as around the mouth. It is, again, in my opinion, kind of like the expression "in the bag" which does not literally mean you have put something in a bag, but that you have understood or grasped or accomplished or just done something. "Parimukhaṁ" means in front. After all, we can only explain our understanding from the mouth (well, in the Buddha's time when writing was only for unimportant stuff like business transactions). Our understanding and wisdom, then, is parimukhaṁ around the mouth, up front: like "put your money where your mouth is"!!!

The two suttas in reference are about learning to set up our attention, awareness (sati) in front. Remember Bodhidharma staring at the wall? Remember the kasina references in the Vishuddhimagga? Well, in front is a focal point, where the sensory organs of the head, ears, eyes, nose and mouth converge ------ where you'd hold your hand if you were looking at a spot in your palm!


Well, that's my take on it. Learning to have the mindfulness right there, in front (which, really, is in your conscious awareness) is what the suttas are about [in my opinion, don't forget that my opinion is just and only that, opinion]. You start with following the breathing and when the "nimitta" appears, when you notice you have settled, when mind and body, breath and discursive thinking have become calm and tranquil, then it is easier to shift, to let your awareness shift to that obvious place "in front". Settled there, it matures, ripens, lets go, recognizes impermanence, dukkha and the impossibility of a separately existing "self".

Then compassion, equanimity and letting-go arise.

:soap: Well! I kind of overdid it. The Buddha said that to teach, one should, among other things, give a gradual discourse and I think I have botched that, big time. But, thereductor, take it little by little. You are where you are and I think, from what you describe, you are on the right track. Just gradually let the half-empty part of the glass fill with the words of the Buddha. Again and again he said he taught dhamma and discipline. Meditation is discipline (in our layman's existence) and dhamma is the fulfillment of that. Very :yingyang: - and I apologize for playing with too many emoticons.
Last edited by Sudarsha on Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sudarsha
parimukhaṁ satiṁ upaṭṭhapetvā
User avatar
Sudarsha
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, CANADA

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Ben » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:48 pm

Nice post, Sudarsha!
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.

Taṃ nadīhi vijānātha:
sobbhesu padaresu ca,
saṇantā yanti kusobbhā,
tuṇhīyanti mahodadhī.

Sutta Nipata 3.725


Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR
Buddhist Life Stories of Australia

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 16208
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Land of the sleeping gods

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby jcsuperstar » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:08 pm

from what i've read no one who has experienced real jhana needs to ask if theyve experienced jhana, it's a life altering event (when you hear of first time experiences they seem alot like those kensho moments in zen that people also claim change lives)
and from what i've experienced this is true.
สัพเพ สัตตา สุขีตา โหนตุ

the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
User avatar
jcsuperstar
 
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:15 am
Location: alaska

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby alan » Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:13 am

It's bundoc. A Tagolog word. I lived in the Philippines for awhile. It means the jungle, the woods, the mountain realms, depending on how it is used. As for Jhana, it is highly unlikely you have been there.
alan
 
Posts: 2554
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:14 am
Location: Miramar beach, Fl.

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Reductor » Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:52 am

alan wrote:It's bundoc. A Tagolog word. I lived in the Philippines for awhile. It means the jungle, the woods, the mountain realms, depending on how it is used. As for Jhana, it is highly unlikely you have been there.


I asked for a little more in way of response than a pat "not happening." Any reason you think it is highly unlikely?
Last edited by Reductor on Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Michael

The thoughts I've expressed in the above post are carefully considered and offered in good faith.

And friendliness towards the world is happiness for him who is forbearing with living beings. -- Ud. 2:1
To his own ruin the fool gains knowledge, for it cleaves his head and destroys his innate goodness. -- Dhp 72

User avatar
Reductor
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:52 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Reductor » Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:25 am

Sudarsha:

Hey, I'm Canadian too! North Alta. all the way.

Thanks for the article by Sona. Someday I'm gonna meet the guy, but when I have the nickles and the proper ok from the wife. Birken is about 14 hours south of here, over the rockies and across the arid lands. But some day soon. When I have more skill in my new occupation, I hope to move close by there.

As for the word of the Buddha making up the empty part. I am thinking more and more that this is true. My previous years of 'practice' were filled with a intellect only Buddhism, which didn't make me a better person. It is like trying to pour water into a non-existent glass. But now I prefer to meditate and use the words only so far as directing my meditation effort: which is why I am not likely to post much outside of this mediation forum.

When I read about this 'around the mouth' stuff in Bodhi's translation (in the notes) I kinda laughed. After a time I took it to mean 'put your attention ahead of you, like it were something tangible'. So I simply took the approach of watching the complete breath, but not letting my mind move in and out with it (a slight distinction, but seems to matter). So far so good. Although the 'truth of the stream' is something I have to keep relearning. Usually I have consistent results, and seem to have my skill, up to whatever point, mastered, then I can no longer do it. A slight change in emphasis occurs with that confidence (cockiness?), and suddenly I am not watching as I should, but instead am expecting; a couple days later and I get my head out of my ass and things go better.


Well, that's my take on it. Learning to have the mindfulness right there, in front (which, really, is in your conscious awareness) is what the suttas are about [in my opinion, don't forget that my opinion is just and only that, opinion]. You start with following the breathing and when the "nimitta" appears, when you notice you have settled, when mind and body, breath and discursive thinking have become calm and tranquil, then it is easier to shift, to let your awareness shift to that obvious place "in front". Settled there, it matures, ripens, lets go, recognizes impermanence, dukkha and the impossibility of a separately existing "self".

This is well put, friend. Very much how I am experiencing this.

All in all, thanks.

One last mention: Ben asked what method I was using, and here it is: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai ... ml#method2
I no longer follow it exactly as written. Mostly I don't spread awareness through the limbs one at a time as he suggests. It helps when things are going rough, but I have found that when my breath is clear and consistent it is not hard to become aware of the body sensations just by intending to be aware of them.
Michael

The thoughts I've expressed in the above post are carefully considered and offered in good faith.

And friendliness towards the world is happiness for him who is forbearing with living beings. -- Ud. 2:1
To his own ruin the fool gains knowledge, for it cleaves his head and destroys his innate goodness. -- Dhp 72

User avatar
Reductor
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:52 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Ben » Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:21 am

Hi thereductor

Thanks for the link to the meditation instructions by Ajahn Lee. That helps me and others to get a better understanding of what you are doing.
But now I prefer to meditate and use the words only so far as directing my meditation effort

That is fantastic.
I am not likely to post much outside of this mediation forum.

You are more than welcome to post outside the meditation forum. In fact, given your attitude regarding the primacy of practice, your point of view may actually be very valuable for others to hear.
When I read about this 'around the mouth' stuff in Bodhi's translation (in the notes) I kinda laughed.

Please keep in mind that Venerable Bodhi is very highly regarded as a translator and teacher. I'm sure his notes explains why he translated the particular instruction the way he did. Also, making the area around the mouth/nostrils as the platform for developing the awareness of respiration is a long-established technique. It might be different but not necessarily inferior!
metta

Ben
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.

Taṃ nadīhi vijānātha:
sobbhesu padaresu ca,
saṇantā yanti kusobbhā,
tuṇhīyanti mahodadhī.

Sutta Nipata 3.725


Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR
Buddhist Life Stories of Australia

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 16208
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Land of the sleeping gods

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Reductor » Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:10 am

Ben wrote:
When I read about this 'around the mouth' stuff in Bodhi's translation (in the notes) I kinda laughed.

Please keep in mind that Venerable Bodhi is very highly regarded as a translator and teacher. I'm sure his notes explains why he translated the particular instruction the way he did. Also, making the area around the mouth/nostrils as the platform for developing the awareness of respiration is a long-established technique. It might be different but not necessarily inferior!
metta

Ben


Sorry for sounding dismissive in that last part. Bodhi is a pillar and I don't argue with him when it comes to translation; I depend on his translations and owe him a huge debt.

I have found the note, and he didn't state 'around the mouth'. That was my own faulty memory. He indicated that "mindfulness is set up at the nostrils or upper lip, wherever the impact of the breath is felt most distinctly" MN, note 140. I laughed a bit when I read it because I had not been using that method, yet seemed to have had success anyway. It was then that I started wondering how important this method really was. I have made a point of using it at times since, but find that my awareness tends to constrict a lot and I lose sense of the body. I'm not really sure why, so I tend toward a more general awareness of the breath.

There again, mileage may vary.
Michael

The thoughts I've expressed in the above post are carefully considered and offered in good faith.

And friendliness towards the world is happiness for him who is forbearing with living beings. -- Ud. 2:1
To his own ruin the fool gains knowledge, for it cleaves his head and destroys his innate goodness. -- Dhp 72

User avatar
Reductor
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:52 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Ben » Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:28 am

The technique Ven Bodhi describes is very close to the method I use when i am practicing anapana.
Having said that, I only usually practice anapana when on a silent retreat, and only for 3.5 days of a ten-day course - or first third of a longer retreat.
The benefit of this form of samatha is that one can develop and maintain highly focused one-pointed concentration on an infintesimally small area. Its hard, really hard, but its worth it.
Because the focus of the vipassana retreats is vipassana, the aim with the first 3.5 days of anapana is to develop kanaka (moment-to-moment) samadhi before one moves onto vedananupassana. But, if one can develop jhana - all the better. My personal attitude is that before a retreat, I re-read the section on anapana-sati in the visuddhimagga and extend 110 percent during the first third of my retreat. One's progress in anapana conditions one's development of insight during insight practice.
Do you have a copy of the visuddhimagga? I highly recommend procuring a copy.
metta
Ben
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.

Taṃ nadīhi vijānātha:
sobbhesu padaresu ca,
saṇantā yanti kusobbhā,
tuṇhīyanti mahodadhī.

Sutta Nipata 3.725


Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR
Buddhist Life Stories of Australia

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 16208
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Land of the sleeping gods

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby catmoon » Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:36 pm

Jahna is an exceedingly intense experience.

If you have ever accidentally stuck your finger onto a live electrical service wire you will have some idea.

That's just the first jahna. After that, things get calmer.

There are signs that precede jahna. The first is that hair will stand on end, perhaps on the head neck or forearms.

There are several more stages, then the torrent hits. Imagine yourself standing in a dry riverbed, with a twenty foot high wall of water coming at you.

Imagine it strikes you but you are not swept away. Instead it flows THROUGH you.

This is something like the first jahna.

Or, maybe I'm totally deluded.
User avatar
catmoon
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:59 am

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Sudarsha » Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:51 pm

Hello, again, thereductor

My tuppence, for what it might be worth, isn't generally along the lines of thought expressed by others here. Yes, if the first time you tried to meditate you fell into jhana, I suppose it would be quite surprising. But let us not neglect to remember that this is exactly what the Buddha himself described/remembered had happened to him as a child.

Two things seem to come into play: first, most of us are lay persons, householders, regular folks. We have rent and mortgages to pay, cars to maintain, children to feed, spouses to enjoy, jobs to do ... in short, we have many hindrances to our practice. Second, however, is the life of the monastic, very, very little to worry about, a great deal of unhindered time for practise.

However, with persistent practise, we learn to let go of the everyday distractions, hindrances and our meditation deepens. This is hardly something new to anyone, I suppose. I have been told point-blank by two revered monastics in the Theravada tradition that jhana is simply not possible. Unfortunately, I did not have the presence of mind to inquire if they thought the Buddha only taught the Seven-Fold Path. Nor the presence of mind to ask why the Buddha would teach samma samadhi if it was not possible!

We so often cannot see the great hindrance of doubt. We are so often only willing to follow our faith in the Buddha just so far.

However, one of my teachers, Ajahn Punna Dhammo (http://www.arrowriver.ca) often teaches from the Cula-suññata Sutta: The Lesser Discourse on Emptiness (http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.121.than.html). Here is, I think, one of the "keys" to the how to of jhana: let go.

And this is exactly what the Buddha did at that festival, as a child. He just let go. Remembering this as an adult, determined to find the solution to the conundrum of suffering, he sat and let go.

As my own practice continues to mature and as I am somewhat less burdened by ordinary hindrances owing to having retired, I find that it is easier to let go, to "sink" (not necessarily a very good word) deeper and deeper into focus/concentration. When we look at the Buddha's description and analysis of samma samadhi, we see that he is describing a process of recognition and letting go.

Simple as that?

Hardly. But I think doable. For the majority of practitioners, both insight/wisdom/understanding/recognition and clarity of practise develop hand in hand, the one encouraging and enabling the other. Thus, and not meant as criticism, I suspect that catmoon's description of sticking a finger into a light socket, as far as meditation experiences go, is somewhat rare. However, if we are able to participate in an extended retreat where, day-by-day we pick up nearer to where we left off the previous day (unlikely in our normal householder lives), then we are much more likely to experience deep conditions of clarity of awareness with little or nearly no hindrances to jhana.

Some interesting reading and listening you may find of value: Ayya Khema's Who is my Self ; Bhante Gunaratana has, on his web site, an MP3 of a jhana retreat which can be helpful; Bhante Vimalaramsi has an excellent text on meditation available to download from his web site as well as many recorded talks; a teacher I have recently encountered, Bhante Sujato (http://santipada.googlepages.com/), has some very insightful and I found very helpful writings and recordings. I especially liked A Swift Pair of Messengers.

But doing a "home" retreat is extremely difficult, requiring much discipline and, very sadly, retreats lead by accomplished teachers do not come cheap. This is simply an unhappy fact of our way of life. I think one can only practise and study, get to know one's abilities and strengths while being aware of weaknesses and things that have to have attention.

Then, I think, growth and even jhana, come by themselves.
Sudarsha
parimukhaṁ satiṁ upaṭṭhapetvā
User avatar
Sudarsha
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, CANADA

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby mikenz66 » Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:19 pm

Hi thereductor,

There is much good advice above.

I don't have a Jhana-oriented practise, but any meditation approach can lead to various blissful and calm states. I find the advice in MN111 Anupada Sutta: One After Another http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html to be useful whatever is arising:
"There was the case where Sariputta — quite secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful qualities — entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born of seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. Whatever qualities there are in the first jhana — directed thought, evaluation, rapture, pleasure, singleness of mind, contact, feeling, perception, intention, consciousness,2 desire, decision, persistence, mindfulness, equanimity, & attention — he ferreted them out one after another. Known to him they arose, known to him they remained, known to him they subsided. He discerned, 'So this is how these qualities, not having been, come into play. Having been, they vanish.' He remained unattracted & unrepelled with regard to those qualities, independent, detached, released, dissociated, with an awareness rid of barriers. He discerned that 'There is a further escape,' and pursuing it there really was for him.

[Similar for all the jhanas and immaterial attainments.]
I've found keeping that in mind useful: No matter what is being experienced it is not to be clung to - there is a "further escape".

My opinion is that I don't see any downside in underestimating my attainments (I don't see what difference it would make to my practise). On the other hand, overestimating could be a serious problem.

Metta
Mike
User avatar
mikenz66
 
Posts: 10526
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Rui Sousa » Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:24 pm

Hello thereductor,

Very good posts above, and very good advice. I will just add a thought.

My focus in practice, at the moment, is trying to understand what I experience. It used to be concentration and tranquility of mind, but now I feel that concentration is a tool to use in the path, not a goal in itself, and it is equally important as other aspects of the Noble Eightfold Path.

looking at it as a part of the Noble Eightfol Path, to wonder if it is Jhana or no Jhana, lie or no lie, slander or not slander, renunciation or not renunciation, awareness or not awareness, Right livelihood or wrong livelihood, or whatever other aspect of the path is just a doubt.

Maybe this doubt about Jhanas is an hindrance in your efforts to develop the Jhanas. ;)
With Metta
User avatar
Rui Sousa
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:01 pm
Location: Sintra, Portugal

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby Sudarsha » Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:38 pm

To paraphrase Browning: a person's reach should exceed his/her grasp, or what's jhana for?

Thanks, mikenz66, for the reference to MN111 Anupada Sutta: One After Another. At University, a friend quipped that God was like a dancer with 7 veils. Six had fallen away, but one remained, which is what made God so interesting. It's probably wicked on many levels, but that's also what makes meditation so captivating, the more we let go, the farther we reach, the farther we see we can and should reach. Finally we penetrate that last veil and, well, all is revealed!

The more we can keep consistent with daily practise, the more we can treat ourselves to a day of nothing but meditation, the more we welcome that far-reaching into our daily lives.

Worrying whether or not we or someone else has reached jhana is just another impediment to let go.

Many thanks, thereductor, for this very inspiring and revealing subject.
Sudarsha
parimukhaṁ satiṁ upaṭṭhapetvā
User avatar
Sudarsha
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, CANADA

Re: Jhana: yes, no, neither, could be? Hmm?

Postby AdvaitaJ » Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:52 am

Hello thereductor,

I also don't have access to a teacher and am relying on books, podcasts, and this forum. If you haven't already, I highly recommend a book by Shaila Catherine titled Focused and Fearless... I also liked Ajahn Brahm's Mindfulness, Bliss, and Beyond, but have found Catherine's book to be much more tightly focused on jhana practice without some of the ambiguities of Ajahn Brahm's more generalized work.

It is quite the intriguing paradox to have a goal that requires you to genuinely put aside striving for it in order to achieve it.

Regards: AdvaitaJ
The birds have vanished down the sky. Now the last cloud drains away.
We sit together, the mountain and me, until only the mountain remains.
Li Bai
User avatar
AdvaitaJ
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:17 am
Location: Michigan, USA

Next

Return to Samatha Meditation and Jhana

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests