Questions about basic breath meditation

General discussion of issues related to Theravada Meditation, e.g. meditation postures, developing a regular sitting practice, skillfully relating to difficulties and hindrances, etc.
heraclito27
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:13 pm

Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by heraclito27 »

The instruction is often something like: "...and we try to become aware of the sensation of the breath as it enters and leaves the nostrils.."
I have some questions.

-Do I have to focus in one nostril or in both at the same time?

-Do I have to focus in a small specific point not allowing any feeling of breath in any other point of the body? Or it is more like an open perspective from that point?

-What can I do in the moments I don't feel any sensation in the nostrils?

-Is it posible to focus totally in a point and see it perfectly constant, unchanging, without interruption, mind absorved without experiencing anything else than that?
Laurens
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:56 pm

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Laurens »

You should try to focus on both nostrils, I think focusing on one would be too much of a challenge.

Breathe naturally, don't control or manipulate your breath in any way. Breathe as you normally would, but simply focus your attention on the nostrils, pay attention to how it feels in that area, hot? cold? rough? smooth? Just be aware of how it feels around that area as you breathe normally, don't worry about controlling your breath in any way.

For me, I focus on my nostrils because that is the area in which I feel the breath more strongly. If you can't feel the breath so well in the nostrils, where do you feel it the strongest? In the throat? the chest? the abdomen? wherever you find it easiest to focus, you can fix your attention there.

Yes you can develop states of deep concentration, however don't think about this when you sit down to meditate. Thinking about achieving this will take your mind out of the present moment, all you should do is watch the breath in the moment. Don't think about what will happen in the next moment.

I hope that helps
Laurens
"If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?"

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Moggalana
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:31 am
Location: Germany

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Moggalana »

Ajahn Brahm wrote:Just ask yourself the question right now, "Am I breathing in or am I breathing out?" How do you know? There! That experience which tells you what the breath is doing, that is what you focus on in breath meditation. Let go of concern about where this experience is located; just focus on the experience itself.
Source
Let it come. Let it be. Let it go.
mkk
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:43 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by mkk »

Here you can find a sutta discussion of the ānāpānasati sutta - scroll down to M 118 and download the pdf. Locate the section 2.4 for information on the term parimukhaṁ which causes the confusion - after that you have to decide by yourself how to put in into practice :).

Metta,
Micha.
User avatar
catmoon
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:59 am

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by catmoon »

Ajahn Brahm wrote:Just ask yourself the question right now, "Am I breathing in or am I breathing out?" How do you know? There! That experience which tells you what the breath is doing, that is what you focus on in breath meditation. Let go of concern about where this experience is located; just focus on the experience itself.
Good grief, did he actually ask "How do you know?". The implications of that little question... are rather broad. So much so that I'm not even sure if I want to look at it or not. OK Ajahn Brahm just went up a notch or two on the Catmoon list of significant phenomenae. If he's gonna ponce about the planet asking questions like that, I'm gonna keep a closer eye on him. :spy:
Laurens
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:56 pm

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Laurens »

You may also find these useful, they are guided meditations, listening to them should give you a basic idea of what to do:

http://www.bswa.org/audio/podcast/Guide ... ns.rss.php

http://aruno.org/index.php?option=com_c ... Itemid=108
"If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?"

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Cittasanto »

mkk wrote:Here you can find a sutta discussion of the ānāpānasati sutta - scroll down to M 118 and download the pdf. Locate the section 2.4 for information on the term parimukhaṁ which causes the confusion - after that you have to decide by yourself how to put in into practice :).

Metta,
Micha.
here are my observations on the word
Parimukhaṁ although a word in its own right, meaning ‘in front of,’ could potentially be a combination of ‘Pari’ + ‘mukha’, ‘Pari’ being a prefix denoting ‘all round; altogether; completely,’ and ‘mukha’ meaning ‘mouth; face; entrance; opening,’ so the pāḷi phrase parimukhaṁ satiṁ upaṭṭhapetvā could be translated as sets forth mindfulness all round the mouth, or entrance [of air], but it should be mentioned that this is assuming one of three possibilities 1. The ṁ at the end is an accidental editing addition; 2. The Buddha being skilled in poetry used the word meaning both ‘all around the mouth’ and ‘in front of;’ 3. There is confusion as to which translation is correct as the ṁ is potentially part of the combined word as well as part of the singular word.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
heraclito27
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:13 pm

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by heraclito27 »

Hi Moggalana and all, thanks for your answers.

I think my problem is that breath is to complex and changing to find a point to focus.

When the session start I see the breath low detail. I can identify "that is the breath". It seems more stable and simple, as if I can grab it.
But in reality I'm not watching the breath so much, I'm watching the concepts.
Concepts seems to give an illusion of stability that is secure and feels good.

But when (I think) I get a little more concentration breath looks very complex and changing. I can't say "that is the breath". What part of this experience is the breath? nostrils seems big surface, the air passing is a set of irregular vibrations, temperature changes, movement. Sometimes is difficult to identify if it is in or out breath. Sometimes breath desappear. Sometimes breath use all the space available.
Where do I have to focus in this stream changing data?

Then I think "I'm not meditating well", or "It's imposible to meditate because there is not such thing as and stable and uniform point where to focus on".

But the text that Moggalana suggest gives me different practical perspective. Maybe I was giving to much emphasis to the word "focus".
mkk
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:43 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by mkk »

As pointed out in the article i have linked there are even more possebilities for understanding the term parimukhaṁ:

Ānāpānasati, Piya Tan 2003, p 123:
The Sanskrit has a different reading, pratimukha. This has many meanings, among which are "reflection" and "presence". Both of these would be appropriate in meditative context. But the word usually, as here, occurs in close conjunction with upaṭṭhāna, which means "presence". I think it is likely that here we have another example of that common feature of Pali or Sanskrit, a conjunction of synonyms for emphasis: literally, "one makes present a presence of presence of mind," or more happily, "one establishes presence of mindfulness."
Wörterbuch Pāli-Deutsch (Klaus Mylius):
parimukhaṁ: Adv gegenwärtig (present) , vor; ~satiṁ upaṭṭhapeti sich vor Augen führen, sich vergegenwärtigen

And PTS:
Parimukha
Parimukha (adj.) [pari+mukha] facing, in front; only as nt. adv. ˚ŋ in front, before, in phrase parimukhaŋ satiŋ upaṭṭhapeti "set up his memory in front" (i. e. of the object of thought), to set one's mindfulness alert Vin i.24; D ii.291; M i.56, 421; S i.170; A iii.92; It 80; Ps i.176 (expld); Pug 68; DA i.210. Also in phrase ˚ŋ kārāpeti (of hair) Vin ii.134 "to cut off (?) the hair in front" (i. e. on the breast) Vin. Texts iii.138, where is quoted Bdhgh's expln "ure loma -- saŋharaṇaŋ."
My experience is:
"Focusing" on a spot - where ever it might be - leads to confusion (in the beginning these feelings are nice).
Just observing that breathing in and out takes place in that moment and "knowing it" in that moment is (for me) a better way to practice this.

Metta,
Micha.
Laurens
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:56 pm

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Laurens »

Some reccomend "following" the breath, rather than fixing your attention on one spot. Buddhadāsa Bhikkhu, for example in his book 'Mindfulness with Breathing' suggests the following:
We first develop and train sati (mindfulness) by using a technique called "following," or "chasing." We imagine the in-breath starting from the tip of the nose and ending at the navel. We imagine the out-breath starting at the navel and ending at the tip of the nose. In between those two points is the space through which the breath runs in and out. We contemplate with sati the properties of this movement in and out, from the tip of the nose to the navel and back again. Back and forth.Do not allow for any gaps or lapses.This is the first lesson: contemplate the breath with sati.
There are so many different interpretations of the Ānāpānasati Sutta, most of which claim to be the 'true method' as taught by the Buddha himself. I think it is best to follow the technique which you find works for you personally. No one really knows which of the many methods (if any) is the actual technique laid down by the Buddha.

Things that helped me were to follow the technique taught by a particular teacher that you admire, this is useful, because if you admire the teacher it can inspire faith that their meditation technique will work in taking you beyond the five hinderances.

Also before you dismiss a particular method its important to know that the chances are, rather than the method being the problem, it is probably more likely to be your approach to that method. If, for example you have little faith in the technique, you think that it won't work, then the chances are it really won't! If you stick at a particular method zealously and faithfully, after a while it will achieve results.

Another thing that helped me immensely was to view the breath as a delicate creature, if you hold on to it too tightly you will hurt it and if you are too loose with your grip it will slip away. I bring this to mind at the start of my meditation, just so that I treat my meditation object in the right way. To me (maybe I am wrong) it seems that you are holding the breath too tightly.

Try not to make things too complicated in your mind. Don't think about it, just breathe! You really have two things in meditation; paying attention to the breath, and bringing your attention back to the breath (once you've noticed that its wondered off somewhere).
"If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?"

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19943
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by mikenz66 »

Hi heralclito27,
heraclito27 wrote: I have some questions...
You have some good answers there. Be aware that one reason why instructions from different teachers may sound contradictory is that they are giving instructions with different aims. It is possible to use the breath to become very absorbed, and it is also possible to use it in a more "insight" sort of way.

See, for example: http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1311#p18145" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

My advice, like Laurens, is to pick instructions from one teacher and follow those for a while.

Metta
Mike
User avatar
Collective
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:12 am

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Collective »

People talk about 'picking' a teacher like they are falling out of trees.

The reality for some is that they ain't any around for many miles

Frustrating!
Laurens
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:56 pm

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Laurens »

Collective wrote:People talk about 'picking' a teacher like they are falling out of trees.

The reality for some is that they ain't any around for many miles

Frustrating!
There isn't a teacher near me either. This quote was enough for me to stick to one particular method of mediation:
In this monastery we concentrate our attention on the tip of the nose and develop awareness of the in- and out-breaths with the mantra Bud-dho.

- Ajahn Chah
I have a huge amount of respect for Ajahn Chah, so this gives me faith in the technique that he taught. It might not seem like much, but using the method of a teacher that you particularly respect, whether they be 100 miles away or in the next village, living or dead, having their 'seal of approval' as it were, for me at least inspires more confidence and faith in the technique.
"If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?"

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Moggalana
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:31 am
Location: Germany

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Moggalana »

In the end, it's not so much a question of which object you choose, but how you relate to it. Basically, you can use almost anything as an object for your meditation. It depends on what you are trying to do. If you are aiming at samādhi, you choose an object, place your awareness upon it, and gradually let go of anything else. Ajahn Brahm describes this process pretty accurately in the link I posted above and in more detail in his book Mindfulness, Bliss, and Beyond.
Let it come. Let it be. Let it go.
Laurens
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:56 pm

Re: Questions about basic breath meditation

Post by Laurens »

Moggalana wrote:In the end, it's not so much a question of which object you choose, but how you relate to it. Basically, you can use almost anything as an object for your meditation. It depends on what you are trying to do. If you are aiming at samādhi, you choose an object, place your awareness upon it, and gradually let go of anything else. Ajahn Brahm describes this process pretty accurately in the link I posted above and in more detail in his book Mindfulness, Bliss, and Beyond.
Indeed and there is a wealth of info available for those who want to follow his technique. You can read his book, listen to his guided meditations online, and listen to his Dhamma talks. It would be a good choice for someone wanting thourough instruction, who is far away from a teacher.
"If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?"

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Post Reply