hi 4 words I can not find a dirrect translation for
Aha¤¤eveko
anatãto,
anatãtà'ti
tassa
any ideas
need definitions
- Cittasanto
- Posts: 6646
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin
- Contact:
need definitions
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
Re: need definitions
tassa is a third-person genitive pronoun.Manapa wrote:hi 4 words I can not find a dirrect translation for
Aha¤¤eveko
anatãto,
anatãtà'ti
tassa
any ideas
Where do you find the other three? I don't know what font you're using to display them, but they don't render properly for me. =/
- Cittasanto
- Posts: 6646
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin
- Contact:
Re: need definitions
hi Sean,seanpdx wrote:tassa is a third-person genitive pronoun.Manapa wrote:hi 4 words I can not find a dirrect translation for
Aha¤¤eveko
anatãto,
anatãtà'ti
tassa
any ideas
Where do you find the other three? I don't know what font you're using to display them, but they don't render properly for me. =/
that was a direct cut and paste job there but I have had a little play with the character map and think I have these correct!
anatīto
anatītā'ti
ahaññeveko
http://www.metta.lk/tipitaka/2Sutta-Pit ... ggo-p.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
these are from the five subjects for frequent recollection.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
Re: need definitions
Ahhh. Much better. Now they look like real words. =D The font used at metta.lk doesn't render properly for me either.Manapa wrote:hi Sean,seanpdx wrote:tassa is a third-person genitive pronoun.Manapa wrote:hi 4 words I can not find a dirrect translation for
Aha¤¤eveko
anatãto,
anatãtà'ti
tassa
any ideas
Where do you find the other three? I don't know what font you're using to display them, but they don't render properly for me. =/
that was a direct cut and paste job there but I have had a little play with the character map and think I have these correct!
anatīto
anatītā'ti
ahaññeveko
http://www.metta.lk/tipitaka/2Sutta-Pit ... ggo-p.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
these are from the five subjects for frequent recollection.
The first two would appear to be declensions of atīta, with a prefix of "an-". The "ti" after "anatītā" denotes a quotation.
I'm guessing ahaññeveko comes from the root hana(-ti,-na), but I'm too busy at the moment to look at it in context. =(
Re: need definitions
Jarā-dhammomhi jaraṃ anatīto.
I am subject to aging. Aging is unavoidable.
Byādhi-dhammomhi byādhiṃ anatīto.
I am subject to illness. Illness is unavoidable.
Maraṇa-dhammomhi maraṇaṃ anatīto.
I am subject to death. Death is unavoidable.
Sabbehi me piyehi manāpehi nānā-bhāvo vinā-bhāvo.
I will grow different, separate from all that is dear & appealing to me.
Kammassakomhi kamma-dāyādo kamma-yoni kamma-bandhu kamma-paṭisaraṇo.
I am the owner of my actions, heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and live dependent on my actions.
Yaṃ kammaṃ karissāmi kalyāṇaṃ vā pāpakaṃ vā tassa dāyādo bhavissāmi.
Whatever I do, for good or for evil, to that will I fall heir.
Evaṃ amhehi abhiṇhaṃ paccavekkhitabbaṃ.
We should often reflect on this.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... nting.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am subject to aging. Aging is unavoidable.
Byādhi-dhammomhi byādhiṃ anatīto.
I am subject to illness. Illness is unavoidable.
Maraṇa-dhammomhi maraṇaṃ anatīto.
I am subject to death. Death is unavoidable.
Sabbehi me piyehi manāpehi nānā-bhāvo vinā-bhāvo.
I will grow different, separate from all that is dear & appealing to me.
Kammassakomhi kamma-dāyādo kamma-yoni kamma-bandhu kamma-paṭisaraṇo.
I am the owner of my actions, heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and live dependent on my actions.
Yaṃ kammaṃ karissāmi kalyāṇaṃ vā pāpakaṃ vā tassa dāyādo bhavissāmi.
Whatever I do, for good or for evil, to that will I fall heir.
Evaṃ amhehi abhiṇhaṃ paccavekkhitabbaṃ.
We should often reflect on this.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... nting.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: need definitions
Hi,
Na kho ahaññeveko jarādhammo jaraṃ anatīto = Indeed, I'm not the only one subject to aging, (who has) not transgressed aging.
It seems to me that it's wrong guess. Ahaññeveko = ahaṃ + eva + eko (I only one). The whole passage goes like this:seanpdx wrote:I'm guessing ahaññeveko comes from the root hana(-ti,-na), but I'm too busy at the moment to look at it in context. =(
Na kho ahaññeveko jarādhammo jaraṃ anatīto = Indeed, I'm not the only one subject to aging, (who has) not transgressed aging.
Bhagavaṃmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā...
Re: need definitions
Ha! That's what I get for guessing. *grin*piotr wrote:Hi,
It seems to me that it's wrong guess. Ahaññeveko = ahaṃ + eva + eko (I only one). The whole passage goes like this:seanpdx wrote:I'm guessing ahaññeveko comes from the root hana(-ti,-na), but I'm too busy at the moment to look at it in context. =(
Na kho ahaññeveko jarādhammo jaraṃ anatīto = Indeed, I'm not the only one subject to aging, (who has) not transgressed aging.
- Cittasanto
- Posts: 6646
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin
- Contact:
Re: need definitions
piotr wrote:Hi,
It seems to me that it's wrong guess. Ahaññeveko = ahaṃ + eva + eko (I only one). The whole passage goes like this:seanpdx wrote:I'm guessing ahaññeveko comes from the root hana(-ti,-na), but I'm too busy at the moment to look at it in context. =(
Na kho ahaññeveko jarādhammo jaraṃ anatīto = Indeed, I'm not the only one subject to aging, (who has) not transgressed aging.
Thanks all!
those words were doing my head in! although I have never seen a deffinition for tassa so wasn't sure of the precise definition, if it had more than one meaning etc.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
- Cittasanto
- Posts: 6646
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin
- Contact:
Re: need definitions
Hi Cooran,
it is the sutta found here,
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
this will definitely teach me to not try & translate again, although, I will be modest and say I am not doing to bad a job, so far, mainly due to the file I got the pali for the main sutta from. I am afraid it is the smaller quotes I am really having difficulty with
it is the sutta found here,
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
this will definitely teach me to not try & translate again, although, I will be modest and say I am not doing to bad a job, so far, mainly due to the file I got the pali for the main sutta from. I am afraid it is the smaller quotes I am really having difficulty with
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill