What happens after the death of a Buddha. I read that, sense Buddha is an Arahant, That the Aggrigates dissolve. Does this means that Buddha has ceased to exist?
And another question, In mahayana i see that people think that Buddha is still connected to the world and that he gives blessings and listens to our prayers. Is this not true to the Theravada Buddhists? Is Buddha gone from this world completely?
When Buddha Died
When Buddha Died
the Buddha said :
"Intention, monks, is karma, I say. Having willed, one acts through body, speech and mind."
"Intention, monks, is karma, I say. Having willed, one acts through body, speech and mind."
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27858
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: When Buddha Died
Greetings Hunter,
SN 22.85: Yamaka Sutta
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
SN 23.2: Satta Sutta
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But in direct answer to your question, I do not know of any Theravada Buddhist that acts as if the Buddha can "hear our prayers".
Metta,
Retro.
That question is answered in...Hunter wrote:What happens after the death of a Buddha. I read that, sense Buddha is an Arahant, That the Aggrigates dissolve. Does this means that Buddha has ceased to exist?
SN 22.85: Yamaka Sutta
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Even when the Buddha was alive, he was already gone from this world, hence the epithet Tathagata (thus-gone-one). For the Buddha there was no being - see...Hunter wrote:And another question, In mahayana i see that people think that Buddha is still connected to the world and that he gives blessings and listens to our prayers. Is this not true to the Theravada Buddhists? Is Buddha gone from this world completely?
SN 23.2: Satta Sutta
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But in direct answer to your question, I do not know of any Theravada Buddhist that acts as if the Buddha can "hear our prayers".
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: When Buddha Died
THANK YOU!
The Yamaka Sutta was fasinating and shows the greatness of the Tathagata!
The Yamaka Sutta was fasinating and shows the greatness of the Tathagata!
the Buddha said :
"Intention, monks, is karma, I say. Having willed, one acts through body, speech and mind."
"Intention, monks, is karma, I say. Having willed, one acts through body, speech and mind."
-
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:27 am
- Contact:
Re: When Buddha Died
You may also wish to check out the Aggivacchagotta sutta:Hunter wrote:What happens after the death of a Buddha. I read that, sense Buddha is an Arahant, That the Aggrigates dissolve. Does this means that Buddha has ceased to exist?
And another question, In mahayana i see that people think that Buddha is still connected to the world and that he gives blessings and listens to our prayers. Is this not true to the Theravada Buddhists? Is Buddha gone from this world completely?
...
"Even so, Vaccha, any physical form by which one describing the Tathagata would describe him: That the Tathagata has abandoned, its root destroyed, made like a palmyra stump, deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for future arising. Freed from the classification of form, Vaccha, the Tathagata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea. 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply.
"Any feeling... Any perception... Any mental fabrication...
"Any consciousness by which one describing the Tathagata would describe him: That the Tathagata has abandoned, its root destroyed, made like a palmyra stump, deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for future arising. Freed from the classification of consciousness, Vaccha, the Tathagata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea. 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply."
...
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And also: Vacchagotta Sutta:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To point is, the Tathagata cannot be found even whilst "alive", how much more so, after "death".
My recently moved Blog, containing some of my writings on the Buddha Dhamma, as well as a number of translations from classical Buddhist texts and modern authors, liturgy, etc.: Huifeng's Prajnacara Blog.
Re: When Buddha Died
Wow!Paññāsikhara wrote:
You may also wish to check out the Aggivacchagotta sutta:
...
"Even so, Vaccha, any physical form by which one describing the Tathagata would describe him: That the Tathagata has abandoned, its root destroyed, made like a palmyra stump, deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for future arising. Freed from the classification of form, Vaccha, the Tathagata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea. 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply.
"Any feeling... Any perception... Any mental fabrication...
"Any consciousness by which one describing the Tathagata would describe him: That the Tathagata has abandoned, its root destroyed, made like a palmyra stump, deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for future arising. Freed from the classification of consciousness, Vaccha, the Tathagata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea. 'Reappears' doesn't apply. 'Does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Both does & does not reappear' doesn't apply. 'Neither reappears nor does not reappear' doesn't apply."
...
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And also: Vacchagotta Sutta:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To point is, the Tathagata cannot be found even whilst "alive", how much more so, after "death".
This is all such deep stuff! This is why I like Buddhism and am happy to be a Buddhist. It tells me that i can end suffering and reach a state of Nibbana!
Thanks Paññāsikhara!
the Buddha said :
"Intention, monks, is karma, I say. Having willed, one acts through body, speech and mind."
"Intention, monks, is karma, I say. Having willed, one acts through body, speech and mind."
Re: When Buddha Died
Yes, to many the Buddha is like a god. In Thailand many pray to the Buddha asking for favours such as wealth, passing exams, health, happiness, etc. Some Buddha statues specialise in certain areas, eg. there is a special Buddha statue in Ayutthaya where people go to pray for success in Business.Hunter wrote:
And another question, In mahayana i see that people think that Buddha is still connected to the world and that he gives blessings and listens to our prayers. Is this not true to the Theravada Buddhists? Is Buddha gone from this world completely?
-----------------------
Bankei
Bankei
Re: When Buddha Died
Hello hunter, Bankei, all,
This might be of interest:
”Do Buddhists Pray?“
A panel discussion with Mark Unno, Rev. Shohaku Okumura, Sarah Harding and Bhante Madawala Seelawimala.
Sarah Harding is a Tibetan translator and lama in the Kagyü school of Vajrayana Buddhism and editor of Creation and Completion: Essential Points of Tantric Meditation (Wisdom).
Rev. Shohaku Okumura is director of the Soto Zen Buddhism International Center in San Francisco.
Mark Unno is ordained in the Shin Buddhist tradition and is an assistant professor of East Asian religions at the University of Oregon.
The Venerable Wadawala Seelawimala is a Theravadin monk from Sri Lanka and professor at the Institute for Buddhist Studies and the Graduate Theological Seminary in Berkeley
EXCERPT:
Buddhadharma:
Bhante Seelawimala, what is the Theravada tradition’s view of other power and self power, and of supplication and prayer generally?
Bhante Wadawala Seelawimala:
In Theravada Buddhism we don’t get into the discussion of self power or other power. We don’t use the notion of “power” in the same way to begin with. We believe our minds are weak in certain areas of our thinking. The ordinary mind is not working to its fullest capacity, but we can correct its drawbacks by proper mental exercises, by following the step-by-step guidance of the Buddha. Gradually, the mind starts to work properly and see things clearly. As a result we can overcome our suffering, frustration and fear.
Prayer is not a necessary part of the process of mental exercise as taught in the Theravada tradition. We discuss these matters in completely different terms than we have heard from Reverend Okumura and Professor Unno. The language is quite different.
Buddhadharma:
In Theravada, are there any deities or universal buddhas or other such principles?
Bhante Seelawimala:
That is not part of our language. We don’t regard the Buddha as universal spirit, or self as universal self, or personal self. We don’t discuss things in those terms. We don’t have any power beyond dhamma. Dhamma means things as they really are, the power of cause and effect, dhammata—real knowledge of how things are. That genuine knowledge—knowing what causes what—can be used to improve our condition.
For example, if we understand that we are ignorant of how things work, we see what causes the ignorance. That help came from the Buddha, to be sure. We appreciate the Buddha for that and we appreciate the dhamma, which is the knowledge given by the Buddha. We appreciate other people who use the knowledge and thereby improve their conditions. That is called sangha. We respect Buddha, dhamma and sangha as our model and our support system, but the actual work is done by ourselves.
We don’t have the notion of praying to someone or asking for help from someone.
http://www.thebuddhadharma.com/issues/2 ... _pray.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
metta
Chris
This might be of interest:
”Do Buddhists Pray?“
A panel discussion with Mark Unno, Rev. Shohaku Okumura, Sarah Harding and Bhante Madawala Seelawimala.
Sarah Harding is a Tibetan translator and lama in the Kagyü school of Vajrayana Buddhism and editor of Creation and Completion: Essential Points of Tantric Meditation (Wisdom).
Rev. Shohaku Okumura is director of the Soto Zen Buddhism International Center in San Francisco.
Mark Unno is ordained in the Shin Buddhist tradition and is an assistant professor of East Asian religions at the University of Oregon.
The Venerable Wadawala Seelawimala is a Theravadin monk from Sri Lanka and professor at the Institute for Buddhist Studies and the Graduate Theological Seminary in Berkeley
EXCERPT:
Buddhadharma:
Bhante Seelawimala, what is the Theravada tradition’s view of other power and self power, and of supplication and prayer generally?
Bhante Wadawala Seelawimala:
In Theravada Buddhism we don’t get into the discussion of self power or other power. We don’t use the notion of “power” in the same way to begin with. We believe our minds are weak in certain areas of our thinking. The ordinary mind is not working to its fullest capacity, but we can correct its drawbacks by proper mental exercises, by following the step-by-step guidance of the Buddha. Gradually, the mind starts to work properly and see things clearly. As a result we can overcome our suffering, frustration and fear.
Prayer is not a necessary part of the process of mental exercise as taught in the Theravada tradition. We discuss these matters in completely different terms than we have heard from Reverend Okumura and Professor Unno. The language is quite different.
Buddhadharma:
In Theravada, are there any deities or universal buddhas or other such principles?
Bhante Seelawimala:
That is not part of our language. We don’t regard the Buddha as universal spirit, or self as universal self, or personal self. We don’t discuss things in those terms. We don’t have any power beyond dhamma. Dhamma means things as they really are, the power of cause and effect, dhammata—real knowledge of how things are. That genuine knowledge—knowing what causes what—can be used to improve our condition.
For example, if we understand that we are ignorant of how things work, we see what causes the ignorance. That help came from the Buddha, to be sure. We appreciate the Buddha for that and we appreciate the dhamma, which is the knowledge given by the Buddha. We appreciate other people who use the knowledge and thereby improve their conditions. That is called sangha. We respect Buddha, dhamma and sangha as our model and our support system, but the actual work is done by ourselves.
We don’t have the notion of praying to someone or asking for help from someone.
http://www.thebuddhadharma.com/issues/2 ... _pray.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: When Buddha Died
Hi Cooran,
The book review that Bankei posted a link to here: http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f= ... 004#p48004" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is worth reading. If one hangs out with Thai people for a while it's pretty clear that there is a difference between the principles espoused by the Venerable in your quote and many of the practices "on the ground" in SE Asia.
Of course, one could argue that "all that stuff isn't actually Buddhism". Nevertheless, it exists.
Metta
Mike
The book review that Bankei posted a link to here: http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f= ... 004#p48004" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is worth reading. If one hangs out with Thai people for a while it's pretty clear that there is a difference between the principles espoused by the Venerable in your quote and many of the practices "on the ground" in SE Asia.
Of course, one could argue that "all that stuff isn't actually Buddhism". Nevertheless, it exists.
Metta
Mike
Re: When Buddha Died
In Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta containing "Fourteen uUnanswerable Questions", Buddha is asked these questions: "Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'After death a Tathagata exists: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'After death a Tathagata does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'After death a Tathagata does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: When Buddha Died
Hi Mikemikenz66 wrote:Hi Cooran,
The book review that Bankei posted a link to here: http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f= ... 004#p48004" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is worth reading. If one hangs out with Thai people for a while it's pretty clear that there is a difference between the principles espoused by the Venerable in your quote and many of the practices "on the ground" in SE Asia.
Of course, one could argue that "all that stuff isn't actually Buddhism". Nevertheless, it exists.
Metta
Mike
There is a lot of scholarly literature on the 2 Buddhisms - ie the ideal which is only found in the books and an extreme minority of practitioners, and the actual which is the Buddhism practiced by most. Its a fascinating topic, maybe one for another thread - are the majority of Buddhists really Buddhists?
-----------------------
Bankei
Bankei
Re: When Buddha Died
Or are the minority really Buddhists?Bankei wrote:Its a fascinating topic, maybe one for another thread - are the majority of Buddhists really Buddhists?
Metta
Mike
Re: When Buddha Died
Which could possibly lead on to a discussion of how the present time is the time of the Decline of the Sasana and how the Dhamma will be weakened and undermined?
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: When Buddha Died
It is not just the present time - but the distant past too. The decline started shortly after the Buddha's death. Maybe the 'ideal' was never practiced at all.cooran wrote:Which could possibly lead on to a discussion of how the present time is the time of the Decline of the Sasana and how the Dhamma will be weakened and undermined?
Bankei
-----------------------
Bankei
Bankei
- Cittasanto
- Posts: 6646
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin
- Contact:
Re: When Buddha Died
Then there wouldn't of been a Buddha!Bankei wrote:It is not just the present time - but the distant past too. The decline started shortly after the Buddha's death. Maybe the 'ideal' was never practiced at all.cooran wrote:Which could possibly lead on to a discussion of how the present time is the time of the Decline of the Sasana and how the Dhamma will be weakened and undermined?
Bankei
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill