what is stealing?

A place to discuss casual topics amongst spiritual friends.
Post Reply
villkorkarma
Posts: 506
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:43 pm

what is stealing?

Post by villkorkarma »

Let us say that one says I own all the food in the hole world.
and I steal some food from the sherwood is that real stealing?
one suffer because one hasnt existed long : )
villkorkarma
Posts: 506
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:43 pm

Re: what is stealing?

Post by villkorkarma »

It is me that judge my self. I take the stuff from the store and pays a person.
What is it that makes that not stealing? Is it that give something to a person that works there,
so becourse of tha thought "all things is own by someone so i must give them something back so i give them this money but I just have 50 oh no 50 is stealing 51 is not stealing" is the laws so correct in nature of law?
one suffer because one hasnt existed long : )
User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 4541
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: what is stealing?

Post by Dan74 »

intention and honesty.

sounds like you are trying to convince yourself.

_/|\_
_/|\_
User avatar
Annapurna
Posts: 2639
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:04 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: what is stealing?

Post by Annapurna »

villkorkarma wrote:Let us say that one says I own all the food in the hole world.
and I steal some food from the sherwood is that real stealing?
Your 'work hypothesis' that somebody owns all the food in the world is unrealistic.

Let's work with something more real.
I take the stuff from the store and pays a person.
What is it that makes that not stealing?
That the owner consents to your taking it, after you pay.

If an owner doesn't want to take your money, and you still take his property, then you steal.
PeterB
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:35 pm

Re: what is stealing?

Post by PeterB »

The Pali of the second precept runs like this;
Adinnadana veramani sikkhapadam samadyami. (spelling ? )

Adinnadana means, to take the not given . Which is often interpreted as the not freely given.
So the whole thing is rendered, " I undertake the rule of training to refrain from taking what is not freely given ".
This is usually applied to material goods, money etc. But some commentators would include other peoples time and so on.
It is not a matter of moral relativism. In other words the kamma-vipaka from stealing from the rich is no different from that incurred by stealing from the poor. The vipaka arises from the intention of taking that which is not freely given.
Post Reply