Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Explore the ancient language of the Tipitaka and Theravāda commentaries
User avatar
Sekha
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:32 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Sekha »

Can anyone help explaining why these words are found at the beginning of some suttas and not others?
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli

http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Mawkish1983
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:46 am
Location: Essex, UK

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Mawkish1983 »

My understanding is that those suttas were remembered by Ven. Ananda at the First Buddhist Council. It was sort of his 'thing'.
User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 17190
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by DNS »

Evaṃ me sutaṃ (Thus, have I heard), Ven. Ananda's thing, as Mawkish said, for remembering the teachings, keeping the tradition oral until the Tipitaka was written down.

I found this article:

http://www.andrew-may.com/zendynamics/thus.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Some pertinent parts:
Almost all suttas in the Pali Canon open with the words Evam me sutam ("Thus [was] heard by me"), usually rendered "Thus have I heard". These words are invariably followed by Ekam samayam ("at one time" or "on one occasion"), after which comes either Bhagava ("the Lord") or the name of a leading disciple, and a statement of where he stayed or what he did. In fact these words "Thus have I heard" are so well known as an introduction to Pali suttas that Wisdom Publications gave this title to my translation of the Digha Nikaya which they brought out in 1987.
Now, in the new translation of the Udana by Peter Masefield, we find for each sutta the curious opening locution "So was there heard by me on one occasion when the Lord (was staying, etc.)".
One of these, which is not perhaps quite decisive, is that in the Itivuttaka the solitary Pali sutta text which does not have this formula, is replaced by a more elaborate formulation. Here, each small sutta opens with the words Vuttam hetam bhagavata vuttam-arahata ti me sutam, which Woodward renders: "This was said by the Exalted One, said by the Arahant; so have I heard". This formula is followed by the direct words of the Buddha with no mention of "on one occasion".
User avatar
Sekha
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:32 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Sekha »

well thank you,

but still the question remains...
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli

http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bankei
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Bankei »

Does any one know, are there any later works, ie non-canonical, that begin with these words, evam me suttam....?
-----------------------
Bankei
User avatar
Sekha
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:32 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Sekha »

I would be surprised. It wouldn't make any sense.
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli

http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Cittasanto »

Dukkhanirodha wrote:well thank you,

but still the question remains...
does it?
the words are there to indicate that the sutta was recited initially at the first council by Ananda. if it doesn't say Evaṃ me sutaṃ it wasn't credited to Ananda rather someone else, who may be un-named, or named as in the case of Venerable Upāli who uses tena samayena.

It is certainly not impossible that some of the suttas were recited by another, later to be credited to Ananda or another, or that some are a later addition, or anthology type text, but the words are there to indicate Ananda.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
User avatar
Sekha
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:32 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Sekha »

yes, I know about Ananda.

So you are suggesting Ananda did not account for all the suttas of the sutta pitaka? I thought so. Because of the story of his 8th condition to become the Buddha's attendant, by which he has heard all the suttas uttered by the Buddha for the remaining time of his life.

In that case, it would be an explanation

thank you
:namaste:
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli

http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Cittasanto »

how many conditions?
I thought there were less?

there is another option which isn't in the range [edit - should say, my knowledge of ] of this sub-forum so appologies

the phrase may indicate the finalisation at the council approved by the sangha as what was said and formally recited for the first time by Ananda, as I believe there is reference to some monks disagreeing with the choice of phrases . . . . maybe one of our Venerable friends may shed light on this? I do believe it was one of their posts which mentioned something like that anyway.
Last edited by Cittasanto on Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
User avatar
Sekha
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:32 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Sekha »

for Ananda's conditions you may look up here: http://www.buddhistelibrary.org/buddhis ... 12lbud.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

thank you for contributing. Hoping one Bhante will come to rescue us from ignorance :popcorn:
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli

http://www.buddha-vacana.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Cittasanto »

chears,

if I see a post by the venerable I have in mind, I'll PM him
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
Paññāsikhara
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:27 am
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by Paññāsikhara »

Dukkhanirodha wrote:Can anyone help explaining why these words are found at the beginning of some suttas and not others?
If you give a brief outline of which texts have "evam me sutam" at the start, and which do not, that may give you a clue.

The issue of how Ananda heard these is also there:
1. Ananda recites at the convocation, saying "thus it was heard by me", meaning that he heard it when the Buddha said that teaching.
2. Ananda recites at the convocation, saying "thus it was heard by me", meaning that somebody told him that the Buddha gave such a teaching.

Even the 8th condition may imply that all those teachings given before Ananda became attendant would either not have been heard, or at most, are type #2 above. Those teachings given whilst attendant, but not present, would also be #2. Only those where he was present would be #1.

Viz "the case of Venerable Upāli who uses tena samayena" is vis-a-vis "ekam samaye", not vis-a-vis "evam me sutam" I think.

Now, for the "ekam samaye", there are differences of opinion:
1. "Thus it was heard by me at one time. The Buddha was staying at ..., with ...", etc.
2. "Thus it was heard by me. At one time, the Buddha was staying at ..., with ...", etc.

Now, #1 is possibly more like type #2 above, when it is heard later after the fact.

Don't know whether or not that answers the question, but maybe some food for thought. ...
My recently moved Blog, containing some of my writings on the Buddha Dhamma, as well as a number of translations from classical Buddhist texts and modern authors, liturgy, etc.: Huifeng's Prajnacara Blog.
mythree
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:24 am
Location: Ratmalana

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by mythree »

"Evam Me sutam" Means thus have i heard according to my pali knowledge...as its said by Ven.Ananda @ the 1st Buddhist Council. in sanskrit Evam Me Sutam = Evam Maya Shratum ... you can see it in some mahayana sutras begins like that.but i think as most of the mahayana sutras are written down after the Asoka period they add up the Evam Maya shratum part to show that this particular sutra was also preached at the 1st council.
Sabbe Saththa Bhavanthu SukhiThaththa...!
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by tiltbillings »

Bankei wrote:Does any one know, are there any later works, ie non-canonical, that begin with these words, evam me suttam....?
The 14th cent CE text called the Anagatavamsa is a rare example.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bud/bits/bits102.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
yuttadhammo
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:03 pm
Location: Sri Lanka
Contact:

Re: Evaṃ me sutaṃ

Post by yuttadhammo »

Ananda: evaṃ me sutaṃ = lit. "thus by me [it has been] heard"
Khujjuttara: vuttañhetaṃ bhagavatā, vuttamarahatāti me sutaṃ = "this too was spoken by the Blessed One; spoken by the Arahant thus (iti) by me [it has been] heard."
Upali: tena samayena = "during that time"
According to the commentarial tradition, the suttas or discourses of the Itivuttaka were collected by the woman lay-disciple Khujjuttara from sermons given by the Buddha while he was staying at Kosambi. Khujjuttara was a servant of Samavati, the consort of King Udena. She had become a stream-enterer after meeting the Buddha and subsequently converted the women of the palace headed by Samavati to the teaching. She used to go regularly to listen to the Buddha and then later repeated what she had heard to the other women. The collection of these sayings became the Itivuttaka. It is said that the emphatic statements at the beginning and end of each of the suttas, reproduced here only in the first and last, were made by Khujjuttara to stress that they were the Buddha's words and not her own.

Whether or not this story is true, the Itivuttaka is the only book in the Pali Canon that introduces and concludes its suttas in this fashion, and it is from the opening statement that the title is derived: "This was said (vuttam) by the Lord ... so (iti) I heard" -- hence Itivuttaka, "The So-was-said" or "Sayings."

http://www.vipassana.com/canon/khuddaka ... .php#intro" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply