Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

General discussion of issues related to Theravada Meditation, e.g. meditation postures, developing a regular sitting practice, skillfully relating to difficulties and hindrances, etc.
User avatar
Wind
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:10 pm

Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Wind »

I wonder why the Buddha did not give any instruction on what to do with the eyes during sitting meditation. Most assume the eyes are shut but some even practice with eyes open. It seems to be an important factor to consider. I wonder if the Buddha shuts his eyes or not when he does sitting meditation. Any clues?
User avatar
Goofaholix
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:49 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Goofaholix »

Wind wrote:I wonder why the Buddha did not give any instruction on what to do with the eyes during sitting meditation. Most assume the eyes are shut but some even practice with eyes open. It seems to be an important factor to consider. I wonder if the Buddha shuts his eyes or not when he does sitting meditation. Any clues?
Probably because meditation was a well known practice in the culture of the day so people already had an understanding of the posture to assume.

But I guess if it were really important he would have explicitly said so it's probably not.
Pronouns (no self / not self)
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.”
― Ajahn Chah
User avatar
Wind
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Wind »

Goofaholix wrote:
Wind wrote:I wonder why the Buddha did not give any instruction on what to do with the eyes during sitting meditation. Most assume the eyes are shut but some even practice with eyes open. It seems to be an important factor to consider. I wonder if the Buddha shuts his eyes or not when he does sitting meditation. Any clues?
Probably because meditation was a well known practice in the culture of the day so people already had an understanding of the posture to assume.

But I guess if it were really important he would have explicitly said so it's probably not.
I thought it wasn't important either until I tried both ways, and it makes a huge difference. So I want to know what the Buddha did. :cry:
User avatar
Goofaholix
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:49 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Goofaholix »

Wind wrote:I thought it wasn't important either until I tried both ways, and it makes a huge difference. So I want to know what the Buddha did. :cry:
I don't know if it was ever recorded.

Most commonly it's eyes closed. Eyes open is usually only encouraged when necessary to prevent sleepiness however you need to be sitting somewhere that doesn't have any visual distraction, which is why those traditions who encourage eyes open encourage sitting facing the wall.
Pronouns (no self / not self)
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.”
― Ajahn Chah
User avatar
Wind
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Wind »

Goofaholix wrote:
Wind wrote:I thought it wasn't important either until I tried both ways, and it makes a huge difference. So I want to know what the Buddha did. :cry:
I don't know if it was ever recorded.

Most commonly it's eyes closed. Eyes open is usually only encouraged when necessary to prevent sleepiness however you need to be sitting somewhere that doesn't have any visual distraction, which is why those traditions who encourage eyes open encourage sitting facing the wall.
Excellent point. Do you know if the non-Buddhist meditators in India during the time of the Buddha practice with eyes closed too?
User avatar
jcsuperstar
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:15 am
Location: alaska
Contact:

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by jcsuperstar »

Mahayana from my instructions and from readings tend to do it eyes open
Theravada eyes closed

either one is fine really.
สัพเพ สัตตา สุขีตา โหนตุ

the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
Thai_Theravada
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:39 am

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Thai_Theravada »

...
Last edited by Thai_Theravada on Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Spiny Norman
Posts: 10154
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
Location: Andromeda looks nice

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Spiny Norman »

Wind wrote:I wonder why the Buddha did not give any instruction on what to do with the eyes during sitting meditation. Most assume the eyes are shut but some even practice with eyes open. It seems to be an important factor to consider. I wonder if the Buddha shuts his eyes or not when he does sitting meditation. Any clues?
Perhaps there is a clue in images of the Buddha? I think there are advantages and disadvantages to both methods actually. Which do you find most effective?

P
Buddha save me from new-agers!
User avatar
Wind
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Wind »

porpoise wrote:
Wind wrote:I wonder why the Buddha did not give any instruction on what to do with the eyes during sitting meditation. Most assume the eyes are shut but some even practice with eyes open. It seems to be an important factor to consider. I wonder if the Buddha shuts his eyes or not when he does sitting meditation. Any clues?
Perhaps there is a clue in images of the Buddha? I think there are advantages and disadvantages to both methods actually. Which do you find most effective?

P
When I meditate with eyes closed, I can focus on my breathing better but my mind tend to wonder more or if I'm a little tired, sometimes I feel I'm drifting into dream land. When I meditate with my eyes open, I find my mind is more focus and more awake and wander less but it is harder to focus on breathing when I'm distracted sometimes by my blinking. Over all I think eyes-closed is better.

And it is because a lot of pictures depict the Buddha with eyes slightly open that I am trying it eyes open but it has been harder to do. I'm not sure if those images of the Buddha are accurate so that's why I started this thread to find out.
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4644
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

Wind wrote:I wonder why the Buddha did not give any instruction on what to do with the eyes during sitting meditation.
Probably for the same reason as he didn't specify exactly how one should sit. The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta just says, “pallaṅkaṃ ābhujitvā” = having sat cross-legged. What suits one person doesn't suit another. To get hung up on such details misses the point.

If you're sleepy, then open your eyes. If you're restless, then shut them — or do whatever works for you.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
Wind
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Wind »

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:
Wind wrote:I wonder why the Buddha did not give any instruction on what to do with the eyes during sitting meditation.
Probably for the same reason as he didn't specify exactly how one should sit. The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta just says, “pallaṅkaṃ ābhujitvā” = having sat cross-legged. What suits one person doesn't suit another. To get hung up on such details misses the point.

If you're sleepy, then open your eyes. If you're restless, then shut them — or do whatever works for you.
Thanks again Venerable. You are right. I will do what works for me. :smile:
PeterB
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:35 pm

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by PeterB »

jcsuperstar wrote:Mahayana from my instructions and from readings tend to do it eyes open
Theravada eyes closed

either one is fine really.
As a generalisation this is largely true in my experience.

When I learned Vipassana I was taught to close my eyes.
When I learned Vipasnya I was taught to half close them and look at the ground about four feet ahead.

Both ways are fine.
User avatar
catmoon
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:59 am

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by catmoon »

If it was critically important to enlightenment that one meditate eyes open, then surely the sutras would have mentioned it. Right?
User avatar
jcsuperstar
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:15 am
Location: alaska
Contact:

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by jcsuperstar »

basically the reasons i've seen to back both are thus;

eyes closed means less distractions
eyes opened means a safeguard against drowsiness

what are you having problems with? the answer to that question should tell you whether or not to open your eyes, nothing else.
สัพเพ สัตตา สุขีตา โหนตุ

the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
User avatar
Monkey Mind
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:56 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA

Re: Why were there no instruction on the eyes in meditation?

Post by Monkey Mind »

In her audio book "How to Meditate", Pema Chodron stated that 'Southern" Buddhists (Theravada) meditate with their eyes closed to minimize distractions. Tibetan Buddhists meditate with their eyes open, though more distracting, to symbolize their openness to the world. (Don't shoot the messenger, just repeating what I heard.)

This cleared up a lot for me. I always wondered why at some meditation workshops I was told to keep my eyes closed, and at others eyes open (soft gaze directed at a spot on the floor 18 centimeters in front of me.)

I have a similar story about mudras.
"As I am, so are others;
as others are, so am I."
Having thus identified self and others,
harm no one nor have them harmed.

Sutta Nipāta 3.710
Post Reply