

On the other hand who is to judge that a debate or a discussion is not directly related to our practice in the moment? Are you in a position to say this or that discussion has no value for my practice?christopher::: wrote:Do any of you feel that sometimes we can get lost in interesting topics which have little to do with our day-to-day practice of the dhamma? If so, why is that? If not, what is the value of arguing and debating topics not directly related to our practice in this moment?
tiltbillings wrote:On the other hand who is to judge that a debate or a discussion is not directly related to our practice in the moment? Are you in a position to say this or that discussion has no value for my practice?
But asking a question can be a way of making a statement and implying a criticism.christopher::: wrote:tiltbillings wrote:On the other hand who is to judge that a debate or a discussion is not directly related to our practice in the moment? Are you in a position to say this or that discussion has no value for my practice?
LOL, no tilt. That's why I phrased the OP as a question, rather than a statement.
tiltbillings wrote:But asking a question can be a way of making a statement and implying a criticism.

Do any of you feel that sometimes we can get lost in interesting topics which have little to do with our day-to-day practice of the dhamma?

BlackBird wrote:Do any of you feel that sometimes we can get lost in interesting topics which have little to do with our day-to-day practice of the dhamma?
Topics of conversation are only the tip of the iceburg. How many of us can say we spend all our waking moments engaged in one skillful activity or another? I can only speak for myself when I say that since the beginning of my life through to this very moment, the majority of my actions have been rooted in greed, hatred and delusion.
A friend told me an interesting story the other day about a man who ran a community garden here in Dunedin, offering free fruit and vege to anyone who wanted it. He was also on the unemployment benefit, and had no intention of finding a job. He justified his unwillingness to get off the benefit by his giving through the community garden, which he funded from his dole money. Now my friend had a problem with this, she said it was abusing the system, that if he really wanted to help people he'd get a job and go and do it, after all she argued: "the unemployment benefit is supposed to be a safety net, a bridge to help you get a new job."
My response was that, sure - It was an abuse of the system, it wasn't how the politicians had intended her taxpayer money to be spent, but to look at the whole picture. There are tens of thousands of people on the unemployment benefit in NZ. Some people are 2nd and 3rd generation dole-bludgers, some spend most of their dole money on booze while their kids go without food to eat in the morning. Here's a man who was using his dole to give people fresh fruit and veges... So what's the priority here? Do we go after fruit-n-vege man, or do we go after the "Jake Heke's" of the world?
You could liken our occasional frivolous conversations here to the fruit-n-vege man, sure it's not always skillful or productive, but for me there's far more sinister manifestations of defilement coming into play in my daily life. Plant analogy? Pulling the plant up by it's roots, as opposed to picking off a leaf.
metta
Jack
christopher::: wrote:Do any of you feel that sometimes we can get lost in interesting topics which have little to do with our day-to-day practice of the dhamma? If so, why is that? If not, what is the value of arguing and debating topics not directly related to our practice in this moment?

Wind wrote:How long does the unemployment benefits last in NZ? It doesn't last forever does it?
Kim O'Hara wrote:Don't let the fact that you're not meditating when you're hanging out here stop you from hanging out with dhamma friends and helping newcomers.
Be honest: would you really be meditating right now if you weren't visiting DW right now? And this is surely better for you than sitting in front of the TV or going down to the pub.![]()
catmoon wrote:When I started out on the net, I would go hammer and tongs at any statement that seemed wrong to me. It was all about finding incorrectness and destroying it. Not only I, but some of our moderators used to play this game! There were some exciting battles.
But as Dharma takes hold, the battles lose their appeal as you start to see the harm they do. Intellectual jousting starts to seem irrelevant, too.
rowyourboat wrote:ok then, take one thing away from each thread that you participate it and use it in your daily practice. bear it in your mind and mindfulness and use it to change yourself as a person.
yes agreed, we are not axe murderers, but is this just dhamma entertainment? More consumption, no real change?

christopher::: wrote:Do any of you feel that sometimes we can get lost in interesting topics which have little to do with our day-to-day practice of the dhamma? If so, why is that? If not, what is the value of arguing and debating topics not directly related to our practice in this moment?
Return to Theravāda for the modern world
Registered users: Alobha, Bing [Bot], binocular, Bub, BubbaBuddhist, diptych4, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], hornets, rahul3bds, Zenainder, Zimesky