christopher::: wrote:With so many Westerners involved, it's a blight on all our societies.

christopher::: wrote:With so many Westerners involved, it's a blight on all our societies.
Prostitution in Thailand and Southeast Asia or How to keep millions of good women down
Justin Hall, 1994 paper
The twentieth century has seen the rise of the world marketplace. In this new world market, Thailand and the Philippines have recently stepped in to play the role of whorehouse to the world. This is facilitated by developing agents having disregarded the development of women's opportunities for economic independence, leaving prostitution as the highest paying job available to many of the women of Southeast Asia.While these countries have benefited from the tourist presence and the resulting foreign exchange, the women who actually put themselves out for their countries development process are to a large extent victims of threefold oppression on the basis of gender, class and the particular role of their homeland in the games of international political economy.
International Political Economics
"Ja, I like Bangkok very much. It's the last place in the world where you can still be a white man." -
a German Bar Owner
The idea of creating designated areas for sex tourism in Asia dates back at least as far as pre-Communist China, where "brothel trains, given the euphemism of 'comfort waggons' were a long accepted part of social life... . Once lusty Europeans could book a ticket to erotic pleasure on some of the specially chartered trains out of Shanghai." But it was to be the Japanese who set up the most comprehensive network of "comfort waggons" staffed by forced prostitutes, or "comfort women." Many women "lived as captives of the military beginning in 1932, when Japan invaded China, to the end of the war in 1945." Forced to have sex with Japanese soldiers, the women were drawn from the Asian countries conquered by Japan, and included "Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, Filipinos, as well as Dutch women captured in Indonesia, then a Dutch colony."
While the Japanese had fostered prostitution on a limited scale to serve their own needs, "the boom in Southeast Asia started with the U.S. presence in Vietnam. There were 20,000 prostitutes in Thailand in 1957; by 1964, after the United States established seven bases in the country, that number had skyrocketed to 400,000." It was this boom, and the resulting slack after the war that was taken up by tourism, that introduced prostitution as a large-scale business to the region.
This whole process was overseen by the governments of both countries. In 1967, Thailand agreed to provide "rest and recreation" services to American servicemen during the Vietnam War, which the soldiers themselves called, "I&I, ... intercourse and intoxication." How did the governments of these countries respond to becoming, in the words of Senator J. William Fulbright, "an American brothel"? One South Vietnamese government official responded, "The Americans need girls; we need dollars. Why should we refrain from the exchange? It's an inexhaustible source of U.S. dollars for the State." In fact, the Vietnam war was responsible for "[injecting] some $16 million into the Thai economy annually, money that tourism would have to replace after the war was over."
Whereas traditionally, the military forces of foreign powers have utilized women of Southeast Asia as prostitutes, or "comfort women," now the soldiers of the countries themselves have taken over. In a survey of Thai students, soldiers, store clerks and labourers, "[a]mong the respondents who have ever patronized prostitutes, the soldiers are the most likely to have visited a prostitute recently: 81% respond that they have visited a prostitute within the past six months." In addition, "[t]he median number of visits during the past six months ranges from two for the students to five for the soldiers..." A survey of military conscripts from the north of Thailand yielded that "73% of them lost their virginity with a prostitute and 97% regularly visit prostitutes."
christopher::: wrote:Locals have always played a part, of course, and as you say they are now the primary supporters...
christopher::: wrote:Hi Ben,
Indeed, acknowledging contributing historical and cultural factors in no way alters our responsibilities or excuses the choices individuals make, in regards to their behavior. It just helps us to understand how certain webs of samsara have come into being. Which can be useful, if one finds themselves in a position to somehow assist in a web's unraveling...
Paññāsikhara wrote:May the victims of these horrible crimes find peace through the protection of those who truly care for them.
May the perpetrators of these horrible crimes realize the pain they inflict, and change their ways for good.
May the Dharma provide both that protection and also the insight into cause and effect to achieve both these aims.
Registered users: barcsimalsi, Ben, Bing [Bot], Digity, diptych4, fivebells, Google [Bot], Helyron, Khalil Bodhi, Lazy_eye, Modus.Ponens, Mr Man, purple planet, rahul3bds, reflection