SN 47.10 Bhikkhunivasako Sutta.
Sorry - I could not find a full & reliable online text.
Brizzy wrote:Is jhana synonymous for satipatthana?
Brizzy wrote:Is jhana synonymous for satipatthana?
SN 47.10 Bhikkhunivasako Sutta.
![]()
Sorry - I could not find a full & reliable online text.
"There was the case where Sariputta — quite secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful qualities — entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born of seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. Whatever qualities there are in the first jhana — directed thought, evaluation, rapture, pleasure, singleness of mind, contact, feeling, perception, intention, consciousness,2 desire, decision, persistence, mindfulness, equanimity, & attention — he ferreted them out one after another. Known to him they arose, known to him they remained, known to him they subsided
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
Virgo wrote:Brizzy wrote:Is jhana synonymous for satipatthana?
Nope.
Kevin
Manapa wrote:No, there are some suttas which refer to this, Satipattana practice can and does lead onto the jhanas but sati and jhana are two seperat things [distinguished apart, but related], if you go onto access to insight and look at the wings to awakening there are some suttas pointed out in the end section look for Jhana in the index.

There is nothing in the quote that says "perfected sati."Brizzy wrote:
I suppose synonymous is not exact. I think that what I am trying to ask is, if people consider that the culmination or aim of satipatthana is jhana - perfected sati.
tiltbillings wrote:There is nothing in the quote that says "perfected sati."Brizzy wrote:
I suppose synonymous is not exact. I think that what I am trying to ask is, if people consider that the culmination or aim of satipatthana is jhana - perfected sati.

Brizzy wrote:
Is purity of sati near enough?
Brizzy wrote:Manapa wrote:No, there are some suttas which refer to this, Satipattana practice can and does lead onto the jhanas but sati and jhana are two seperat things [distinguished apart, but related], if you go onto access to insight and look at the wings to awakening there are some suttas pointed out in the end section look for Jhana in the index.
I suppose synonymous is not exact. I think that what I am trying to ask is, if people consider that the culmination or aim of satipatthana is jhana - perfected sati.
Brizzy wrote:Manapa wrote:No, there are some suttas which refer to this, Satipattana practice can and does lead onto the jhanas but sati and jhana are two seperat things [distinguished apart, but related], if you go onto access to insight and look at the wings to awakening there are some suttas pointed out in the end section look for Jhana in the index.
I suppose synonymous is not exact. I think that what I am trying to ask is, if people consider that the culmination or aim of satipatthana is jhana - perfected sati.
tiltbillings wrote:Brizzy wrote:
Is purity of sati near enough?
Be kind enough to supply the Pali of the text in question.
"Then again the monk, with the abandoning of pleasure & stress — as with the earlier disappearance of elation & distress — enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither-pleasure-nor-pain.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
‘‘Puna caparaṃ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu sukhassa ca pahānā dukkhassa ca pahānā pubbeva somanassadomanassānaṃ atthaṅgamā adukkhamasukhaṃ upekkhāsatipārisuddhiṃ catutthaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati.
Manapa wrote:Hi Brizzy & Alex,
Purity and perfected are not the same and would give slightly different connotations.
purity would give an implication of how sati is when in accompanying this Jhana, whereas perfected would imply that sati is not a seperate quality, and sammasati as a fold would not exist because it would be a part of sammasamadhi
as it is taught seperately, and within contexts outside of samadhi and Jhana the quote isn't providing reference to perfected, which I believe tilt was looking for.
just my take.
And then we would not have those pesky vipassana traditions coming out of Burma.jcsuperstar wrote:if jhana and sati were synonymous wouldn't we just have a 7fold path?
Alex123 wrote:tiltbillings wrote:Brizzy wrote:
Is purity of sati near enough?
Be kind enough to supply the Pali of the text in question.
example of 4th Jhana"Then again the monk, with the abandoning of pleasure & stress — as with the earlier disappearance of elation & distress — enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither-pleasure-nor-pain.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
‘‘Puna caparaṃ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu sukhassa ca pahānā dukkhassa ca pahānā pubbeva somanassadomanassānaṃ atthaṅgamā adukkhamasukhaṃ upekkhāsatipārisuddhiṃ catutthaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati.
Thanks
![]()
Purity of sati (satipārisuddhiṃ) happens in 4th Jhana.
He said ignoring other comments made about this issue which raises the question: And your point is?Brizzy wrote:Purity of sati (satipārisuddhiṃ) happens in 4th Jhana.
Manapa wrote:Hi Brizzy & Alex,
Purity and perfected are not the same and would give slightly different connotations.
purity would give an implication of how sati is when in accompanying this Jhana, whereas perfected would imply that sati is not a seperate quality, and sammasati as a fold would not exist because it would be a part of sammasamadhi
as it is taught seperately, and within contexts outside of samadhi and Jhana the quote isn't providing reference to perfected, which I believe tilt was looking for.
just my take.

Registered users: Bhikkhu_Samahita, Bing [Bot], BuddhaSoup, cooran, Exabot [Bot], Feathers, fivebells, Google [Bot], JohnWB, Magoo, Majestic-12 [Bot], mettafuture, reflection, retrofuturist, thaijeppe, upekha