Sections

Tell us how you think the forum can be improved. We will listen.
Locked
User avatar
Assaji
Posts: 2106
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:24 pm

Sections

Post by Assaji »

Hi,

I find the sections of the forum peculiar.

There's a 'Classical Mahavihara Theravada' (as if Mahavihara still exists). At best it represents the modern scholarly-traditionalist approach, apparently with Burmese emphasis on Abhidhamma.

As I understand, anything that does not fit a Procrustean bed of scholarly-traditionalist approach, goes to "Modern Theravada". It's strange since even in Asian Theravada there's a lot besides the Commentaries and Burmese scholarly approach.

The main thing, actual practice is squeezed into "Theravadin meditation techniques", as if practice is about quick fix 'techniques', and not about way of life.

And the Dhamma itself is placed on the very bottom, with two largely irrelevant subsections.

In general, I think that the built-in sectarian division of the forum, inherited from E-Sangha, does not make for a good discussion.

I would suggest the non-sectarian sections:
- General questions (with Announcements and Lounge);
- Issues of practice (perhaps with Virtue, Concentration and Wisdom subsections);
- Suttas;
- Key concepts and models (kamma, paticca-samuppada, etc.);
- Pali language (with discussion of Pali terms);
- Theravadins of all the countries (with Introductions, Centers and Personalities subsections);
- Books, articles and (study) materials;
- Users' Forum (with Suggestion Box).

Metta, Dmytro
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Sections

Post by Ben »

Thanks Dmytro
We're having a look at your suggestion and someone will get back to you.
Cheers

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Jechbi
Posts: 1268
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:38 am
Contact:

Re: Sections

Post by Jechbi »

Dmytro wrote:- Issues of practice (perhaps with Virtue, Concentration and Wisdom subsections)
This in particular seems like an excellent suggestion. It's a natural division of topics of practice. It also would serve as a reminder that practice is, as you say, a way of life.

Just my 2 cents.

:)
Rain soddens what is kept wrapped up,
But never soddens what is open;
Uncover, then, what is concealed,
Lest it be soddened by the rain.
User avatar
christopher:::
Posts: 1327
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:56 am

Re: Sections

Post by christopher::: »

Just to throw 2 cents in... I think if you create too many subforums early on it could limit community interactions. Think of a dhamma center, they usually have one big hall where lots of different things happen at different times. Each conversation within a forum is like a little circle, a discussion room of its own.

I think a sense of community sometimes gets lost when too many boxes are set up and everything is divided up, compartmentalized. Having broad general forums allows for greater range in a discussion.

Over time a few more forums might be helpful, as you see the need arising from overcrowding or confusion, imo.

Oh, one other suggestion, how about a "General Dharma Talk" subarea in the General Dhamma section? They have that over at Drolma's site, for General discussion of dharma, not specific to particular traditions. A topic such as retro started for comparison of Theravada and Zen might fit better over there then in the Modern Theravada section.

Maybe, maybe not....

end of 2 cents, or was it 3 cents?

:geek:
"As Buddhists, we should aim to develop relationships that are not predominated by grasping and clinging. Our relationships should be characterised by the brahmaviharas of metta (loving kindness), mudita (sympathetic joy), karuna (compassion), and upekkha (equanimity)."
~post by Ben, Jul 02, 2009
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sections

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,

A quick note to let you know we've created a Pali forum now in response to this request, and are still thinking about the other comments.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sections

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,

We've also now reallocated and redefined a few forums to reflect some of the suggestions above.

That's probably it for this round of changes although we don't envisage any wholesale changes in the near future.

We did however need to make clear that it's clear that Modern Theravada in this context doesn't exclusively refer to new interpretations of scriptures and the works of modern bhikkhus etc.... it refers to the full gamut of Theravadin thought as we would see in the world around us today in the 21st century... ranging from the conservative to the heterodox.

If there are any further ideas, please pop them into a separate Suggestion Box thread.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Locked