Did I reach access concentration or what?
- jcsuperstar
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:15 am
- Location: alaska
- Contact:
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
does it matter? if you cant reach this point anymore than it certainly seems like it doesn't however you could use it as a reminder that there are better things out there still and motivate yourself to meditate more!
สัพเพ สัตตา สุขีตา โหนตุ
the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27858
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Greetings Bodom,
Metta,
Retro.
I think Thanissaro Bhikkhu has said something like that, but that may or may not be what you're thinking of.bodom wrote:Somewhere in the canon, and I cant for the life of me find it right now, there is a sutta in which the Buddha says "Only those who have not attained jhana speak against it, but for those that have attained jhana, they would never speak against it." It is along those lines if anyone knows what im talking about?
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Yeah he quoted it in one his study guides but for some reason doesn't give the source.retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Bodom,
I think Thanissaro Bhikkhu has said something like that, but that may or may not be what you're thinking of.bodom wrote:Somewhere in the canon, and I cant for the life of me find it right now, there is a sutta in which the Buddha says "Only those who have not attained jhana speak against it, but for those that have attained jhana, they would never speak against it." It is along those lines if anyone knows what im talking about?
Metta,
Retro.
Liberation is the inevitable fruit of the path and is bound to blossom forth when there is steady and persistent practice. The only requirements for reaching the final goal are two: to start and to continue. If these requirements are met there is no doubt the goal will be attained. This is the Dhamma, the undeviating law.
- BB
- BB
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Hi all
I think I remember reading it in the first half of the MN. If you have a copy, just go through the index entries for jhana and I'm sure you'll get it.
kind regards
Ben
I think I remember reading it in the first half of the MN. If you have a copy, just go through the index entries for jhana and I'm sure you'll get it.
kind regards
Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725
Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global Relief • UNHCR
e: [email protected]..
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725
Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global Relief • UNHCR
e: [email protected]..
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Thank you all. I think I can reach this state again if it is access concentration that I reached, I am just not putting enough effort. I forgot to mention that during that state I also experienced unconditional love for all beings.
I know that zen/ch'an means Jhana/Dhyana but I meant that Jhana in a sense of heightened mental state or altered state of consciousness is not practised in Mahayana Buddhism.
Metta to you all.
I know that zen/ch'an means Jhana/Dhyana but I meant that Jhana in a sense of heightened mental state or altered state of consciousness is not practised in Mahayana Buddhism.
Metta to you all.
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Which is a good thing; however, trying to get back what you had can be just another form of grasping. Simply do the practice and what happens happens - and what does not happen does not happen..smokey wrote:Thank you all. I think I can reach this state again if it is access concentration that I reached, I am just not putting enough effort. I forgot to mention that during that state I also experienced unconditional love for all beings.
Not quite true.but I meant that Jhana in a sense of heightened mental state or altered state of consciousness is not practised in Mahayana Buddhism.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
No not true. Those states are found in Mahayana Buddhism. From a Theravadin perspective they are found layered in extraneous material, but that is not the topic of this thread.tiltbillings wrote:Which is a good thing; however, trying to get back what you had can be just another form of grasping. Simply do the practice and what happens happens - and what does not happen does not happen..smokey wrote:Thank you all. I think I can reach this state again if it is access concentration that I reached, I am just not putting enough effort. I forgot to mention that during that state I also experienced unconditional love for all beings.
Not quite true.but I meant that Jhana in a sense of heightened mental state or altered state of consciousness is not practised in Mahayana Buddhism.
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
This is a very common problem with meditation. We have a meditation experience (which is possible because we're not grasping), we enjoy it, we want to have it again, so we try to reproduce it, getting frustrated that the experience we are having isn't the same as the experience we had that other time.tiltbillings wrote:trying to get back what you had can be just another form of grasping. Simply do the practice and what happens happens - and what does not happen does not happen..
Rather than trying to replicate those feelings Smokey, simply open up to your actual experience, see your experience clearly, this experience right now. And now.
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
The paradox of meditation is that the desire for certain mental states often acts as a hindrance preventing that state from arising. To get that experience again , you need to drop that desire.
I remember reading an a book long ago that a Chinese chan master who lived in the previous century, put some potatoes into a pot to prepare them for boiling. Then he went to meditate for what he thought was a short period. When he came out of meditation, and checked the pot, he found that it was dry and the potatoes had sprouted.
I remember reading an a book long ago that a Chinese chan master who lived in the previous century, put some potatoes into a pot to prepare them for boiling. Then he went to meditate for what he thought was a short period. When he came out of meditation, and checked the pot, he found that it was dry and the potatoes had sprouted.
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Hi smokey,
As to the experienced state itself sounds like an absorption into the fire kasina to me. They can happen spontaneously when the conditions are right.
As to trying to get back to an experience I disagree with what was said. This is not grasping. On the contrary, the Visuddhimagga teaches to become a master one has to practice exactly that: to become able to enter any absorption one wants at any time.
Were you aware that this state was there while it was there or did you realise this was not your usual experience afterwards?smokey wrote:When I first became interested in Buddhism four years ago, I downloaded a free e-book about ch'an meditation. I have done everything according to book while meditating(e.g. the posture, breathing etc.). I had no expectations. And in about five to ten minutes of meditation I started to feel bliss and joy in area of my heart and head accompanied with equanimity and tranquility . I barely put any effort in meditation. Since then I never experienced anything alike. I do not remember what my concentration was alike during that state of mind, I just remembered what I felt. Did I experience access concentration or what was that?
As to the experienced state itself sounds like an absorption into the fire kasina to me. They can happen spontaneously when the conditions are right.
As to trying to get back to an experience I disagree with what was said. This is not grasping. On the contrary, the Visuddhimagga teaches to become a master one has to practice exactly that: to become able to enter any absorption one wants at any time.
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Of course it is. He has no idea how it happened. If he was deliberately doing a particular practice, then it might make some sense, but what he described was one of those spontaneous things that can happen , and even if it was the result a very particular practice, one can way too easily get lost in trying to get the experience back rather than doing the practice, being open to what happens. "I want that experience again" is - no matter how you cut it - grasping.Freawaru wrote:
As to trying to get back to an experience I disagree with what was said. This is not grasping.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
That is not necessarily a sign of anything desirablepilgrim wrote:The paradox of meditation is that the desire for certain mental states often acts as a hindrance preventing that state from arising. To get that experience again , you need to drop that desire.
I remember reading an a book long ago that a Chinese chan master who lived in the previous century, put some potatoes into a pot to prepare them for boiling. Then he went to meditate for what he thought was a short period. When he came out of meditation, and checked the pot, he found that it was dry and the potatoes had sprouted.
We are not Yogis.
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Hi tilt,
On the other hand you are of course right that too much "wanting" is not helpful in reaching any state or developing sampajanna in the first place. A certain relaxation and "letting go" and "opening up" is required. I just disagree that the terms "grasping" and "clinging" have anything to do with this kind of "wanting".
I think "grasping" in the sense of Dhamma refers to what leads to clinging. Clinging refers to the loss of sampajanna. Neither has to do with wanting to enter a specific state of experience.tiltbillings wrote:Of course it is. He has no idea how it happened. If he was deliberately doing a particular practice, then it might make some sense, but what he described was one of those spontaneous things that can happen , and even if it was the result a very particular practice, one can way too easily get lost in trying to get the experience back rather than doing the practice, being open to what happens. "I want that experience again" is - no matter how you cut it - grasping.Freawaru wrote:
As to trying to get back to an experience I disagree with what was said. This is not grasping.
On the other hand you are of course right that too much "wanting" is not helpful in reaching any state or developing sampajanna in the first place. A certain relaxation and "letting go" and "opening up" is required. I just disagree that the terms "grasping" and "clinging" have anything to do with this kind of "wanting".
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Huh? It depends. Having a nifty, spontaneous experience and wanting to have repeat it again is not something any teacher I have worked with, Zen, Tibetan or Theravadin would recommend.Freawaru wrote:
I think "grasping" in the sense of Dhamma refers to what leads to clinging. Clinging refers to the loss of sampajanna. Neither has to do with wanting to enter a specific state of experience.
That is fine, but you have not shown it to be otherwise.A certain relaxation and "letting go" and "opening up" is required. I just disagree that the terms "grasping" and "clinging" have anything to do with this kind of "wanting".
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Did I reach access concentration or what?
Yeah, maybe he's just a heavy sleeper.PeterB wrote:That is not necessarily a sign of anything desirablepilgrim wrote:The paradox of meditation is that the desire for certain mental states often acts as a hindrance preventing that state from arising. To get that experience again , you need to drop that desire.
I remember reading an a book long ago that a Chinese chan master who lived in the previous century, put some potatoes into a pot to prepare them for boiling. Then he went to meditate for what he thought was a short period. When he came out of meditation, and checked the pot, he found that it was dry and the potatoes had sprouted.
We are not Yogis.